What was the research looking at?
The research was looking at investigating the differences shown in attachments between infants and their primary caregivers (parents/ guardians etc.).
How was the experiment carried out? Who was involved?
The experiment involved using a toddler, the child’s guardian and a stranger to see the child’s reaction to the different situations using the following stages:
Results from experiment:
Three different attachment styles were discovered by Ainsworth: secure, insecure, avoidant and insecure ambivalent. The attachment style that the child developed was dependant on how the child and mother interacted in the early stages of the child’s life:
Conclusion:
It was concluded from these results that the classification of the child depends on the treatment from the guardian/ parent:
Secure attachment: It is likely that if the child has secure attachment the primary care was responsive and sensitive to the child’s needs.
Insecure ambivalent attachment: If the child has insecure ambivalent attachment the guardian/ parent was most probably inconsistent in attending to the child’s needs; sometimes the child was attended to and sometimes ignored.
Avoidant attachment: A child with avoidant attachment behaviour would usually be a product of unresponsive care so the child becomes wise to the fact that communication is futile as there will be no response to meet their needs.
Evaluation:
Mary Ainsworth’s ‘strange situation’ classification was deemed to have good reliability, becoming the accepted worldwide methodology for measuring attachment; and proved to have good consistency when a study in Germany showed that 78% of the children tested aged 1 years then again at 6 years were placed under the same classification.
However, the classification has been questioned about the fact that the classification only identifies the attachment to the mother, whereas the