Preview

Theocracy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
305 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theocracy
The Dangers of a Theocracy

A theocracy is a form of government where a priest rules in the name of God.

In a real theocracy, God is the head of the state. In a pure theocracy, the leader is believed to

have a personal connection God like a prophet. The government claims to rule on behalf of

God and divine approval of government institutions and laws. This is dangerous because you

live in a place where laws are handled by people who say they are prophets of the religion.

When one person is in full power it is not good. The leader ends up like a dictator who

controls what you do and what you believe in and this causes the leader to become too

powerful. They can make up any rule or law they want and say that God wants it that way

and others will follow. It ends up not even being about God anymore and more about them.

They one in power lies to get more control and sometimes they take money.When people

started getting accused of witchcraft, there was not much they could do because everyone

was on the side of the accuser. A lot of people died from this and people started to accuse

others just so a finger would not be pointed at them. The leader gets so powerful that no one

else up getting a say. On dangerous thing in a theocracy is that the people involved in it

believe that the person in charge is in there best interest when really they only care about

them self. When the leader or 'prophet' tell them to do something because God said to they

will obey and do so. A theocracy is not a good form of government in my opinion because

only one person gets a voice.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Places a high degree of authority in the leaders. It implies the rule of one position over a church or many churches.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    justify and legitimize their ruling. Divine right implied that God, not the individuals, gave the…

    • 1826 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secularism: The idea that ethical and moral standards should be formulated and adhered to for life on Earth, not to accommodate the prescriptions of a deity and promises of a comfortable afterlife. A secular state is the opposite of a theocracy.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is known that a state without government is a state in chaos and confusion. What the best possible form of government should be has been debated by political philosophers over time. To vigorously ensure the well-being of a state, the government of that state should be absolute or one in which all power is vested in a single ruler. A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because God establishes kings, decisions would be made quicker, and there would be less conflict between differing parties.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Bible explains the role of government, and also was built by our founding fathers on biblical principles. Laws should be based on God’s laws. The Bible urges us to pray, petition, and thanksgiving be made for all those in authority. In a biblical worldview the government should promote an environment that provides the work of God. He created humanity, which includes the government, and everyone should know Him. A government based on God would allow this and encourage this.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theocracy is a method of government in which a divine being is formally recognized as the public Head of state and community officials are viewed as divinely guided. In a theocratic civilization, God himself is thought of as the head of state. Conscious of how a theocracy can destroy a society, Miller intends to imply – through his portrayal of John Proctor and Reverend Hale – the thematic idea that theocracy is essentially blind and corrupt. One indication of Miller’s intent, in this respect, is his formation of John…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A theocracy is a type of government in which God or a deity is the ruler, and whose practices, laws and teachings are led by a priest, or a minister. The most recent leader, Warren Jeffs, was a self proclaimed prophet who claimed that God was here to minister to the people through him. Communism is a type of government where everybody is treated as equals and every one earns the same amount of money. Goods and money are controlled in the FLDS society and only a particular group of people (the founding families) had luxuries. A patriarchal society is one where men take control and importance over women. The women in the FLDS culture are brought up to have the mindset that they are put on this earth to please men only. So, I would consider the FLDS culture to have similar or a…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Curcible

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theocracy is a government that is lead by god. The churches and its leaders give the word of god. There is no such thing as a grey area to the people of Salem. You are either doing right by God or working with the Devil. Dansforth states in Act three, “…a person must be with this court or he must be courted against it” (Miller 55). A consequence that put the fear into the hearts of everyone is death. That if anyone of them would be found guilty of witchcraft they would hang. A country that still practices theocracy is Iran. Since Iran is a Muslim dominate country the Koran is what they go by, much like the puritan society in Arthur Millers “The Crucible,” lives by the Bible.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics 316

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The beliefs that the big guy in the sky should help regulate the way one acts and shows respect and honor amongst one another is a violation to our freedoms. If the government step in and tried to regulate the way we handle situations it would be wrong because setting a law and punishing one for not following the rules would turn into a hierarchy. It would also make everyone the same and no one would have a belief or right about his own ways. More than likely it would be unlawful for the government to take control over ones beliefs or virtues.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas More, Niccolo Machiavelli, and John Calvin are three theorists who share and justify their views on the relationship between the state and religion. More, the Catholic, Machiavelli, a critic of the Catholic Church, and Calvin, the Protestant, all believe that religion is a very important element of the state. However, More and Calvin also believe that religion can constrain rulers as well as support them, which ultimately leads to their conclusion that the arbitrary use of power by the state should have a limit. In the book Utopia, Thomas More describes what he believes an ideal society’s characteristics are by creating a fictional state, a Utopia. He builds the new world on paper. One of the more significant points in More’s piece is that religion is a…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout our social milieu, human beings strive to create peace, regardless of the incapability to do so. However, dominance supersedes the ability to eliminate conflict. It is through autocracy where individuals attempt to oppose the leadership, resulting in a multiple of beliefs and varied ideas, causing conflict. Theocracy was formed in Salem “to prevent any kind of disunity” consequently resulting in rebellion, creating two sides of conflict. Due to the common desire to express free will, antagonism was evident.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monotheism is the belief in one god. If a mass group of people believe in something singular, it’s more likely for all of them to have similar morality and ethic beliefs. This can make the entire society lean together toward to better morals. Monotheistic believers believe that the one god they believe in is to judge them so they all stay in place.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crucible Quotes

    • 3908 Words
    • 16 Pages

    This is, as Miller points out, the purpose of their theocratic society, but also gives reasons for what happened when people didn’t…

    • 3908 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays