Preview

Theories of Materialism and Idealism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories of Materialism and Idealism
Assimogiorgos

Billy Assimogiorgos

SOCS 2570: Perspectives on Human Nature & Political Thought

Prof: Edward G. Winslow

TA: Marc Weinstein (Thurs 10:30-12:30)

Due: Wednesday, March 19, 2014.

Whitehead vs. Marx: Theories of Materialism and Idealism

Materialism and idealism are two theories that greatly differ but are essentially straightforward to grasp in terms of contrasting and comparing the two. Karl Marx, a nineteenth century German philosopher and socialist saw materialism as a theory in regards to all reality being based on matter. Materialism is based on more of a scientific and factual approach. For example, the idea of a table was developed by humans because of their experience with other tables, not from consciousness. Idealism, is a theory that refers to the mind or the spirit of God being the origin of all material things on Earth. Using the table example, a materialist would argue that social being determines consciousness, whereas an idealist would argue that consciousness determines being. Materialism regards all phenomena even that of the mind, is due to a material agency. Idealism regards ideas as the only reality. The majority of people do not live a life free of materialism. To do so people must be happy with a life free of indulging their bodies and minds with things that pleasure the senses. Very few people are without materialism, which would mean that money and other physical possessions mean very little to them and it is essential that they have to choice to be able to freely choose this without being pushed on by certain societal forces. The most popular form of idealism is the idea that individuals can do anything that set their minds to. For example, one can overcome poverty if they put their mind to it and try really hard. Poverty is not a social phenomenon caused by societal limitations or illness in the family, rather a personal choice. In this paper I will be discussing Karl Marx 's history materialism theory, Alfred North



References: Schilpp, Paul Arthur, editor: _The Philosophy of Alfred North White,_ "The Library of Living Philosophers," (LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Company, 1951) _Process and Reality_ (New York: The Macmillan Company 1929. New York: The Free Press, 1978.) Marx, Karl: _Das Kapital_. (Capital Volume III, 1894) Whitehead, Alfred North: _Nature Alive_ (Lecture 1 & 2) Whitehead, Alfred North, _Modes of Thought,_ (Lectures VII and VIII) Whitehead, Alfred North, _Adventurs of Ideas._ (Chap. II) A.H. Johnson, _Whitehead 's Theory of Reality,_ Boston: The Beacon Press, 1952, p.116

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    sosc1140 essay 2

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First of all, using historical materialism approach to understand to capitalist society helps people find that there is a contradiction in capitalism. historical materialism is a historical approach to understand society that looks at the way people produce things and exchange things (Frederick 292). The ways they produce things…

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx argues in The German Ideology that material allows for more culture. Material is the road to true humanity. These materials are not only those things that we possess, such as cars, clothes, and houses, but also material that we gain through life experience itself. Winter defines her life by material. For her, money is…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Materialism by definition is the thought “brain events cause mental events and some mental events cause brain events” in a measurable and quantifiable fashion. Thomas Hobbes famously stated in his book Leviathan that “I can explain all…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages

    Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patrick stokes, lecturer in Philosophy at Deakin University also writes an article on a similar…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory of the Cave

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the parable, Plato describes a group of prisoners chained in a dark cave. One of the prisoners is released and was forced to climb upward out of the cave into the distant light. Plato then concludes that the prison is the world we see in our eyes; the fire is the sun; and the climb upward is the journey of the mind towards knowledge (Philosophy: Q&T, p.9).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Materialist Theory

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view that I have selected and decided to analysed, explained and defend is the materialist theory. The main reason for my choice of this view over the idealist one is that, in my opinion, empiricism shows us humans and provide hard evidence which I will detailed in this opinion piece that matter does exists and we are surrounded by it on a day to day basis. The great Philosopher John Locke express his opinion which I clearly agree with that our minds have no ideas and concepts when we are born, as such we develop and gain knowledge over time from experiences. Without experiencing sensation or reflection we generally would not be able to differentiate the differences between physical properties such as shapes, size, texture or colour. For…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates as Eros

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Truly, love takes on many different forms. Love, for many centuries, has been given many different names. It also serves different functions. To distinguish a specific type of love, one of them is called eros. How love as eros can be defined is based upon the utilization of a specific writer’s perspective. Numerous published written works may account for the definition of eros. In this Essay, Plato’s perception of love as eros will be described. Furthermore, how and why Socrates, of “The Apology” by Plato, embodies Plato’s definition of eros will be shown. This embodiment will be based off Plato’s eros as poor being, eros as an intermediary between God and men, and eros as resemblance of the “god of Plenty”, eros’ father (Needleman 15 – 17).…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reductive Materialism

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reductive materialism is a 'sub theory ' or a version of Physicalism. It suggests that sensations of the mind correlate exactly to physical 'movements ' of the brain. In other words, every thought or experience which occurs in your mind, can be found as activity in your brain. This does not mean however, that the mind and the brain are the same thing, just that they are both different experiences of the same thing. For example, a neuroscientist may be able to study your brain activity as you experience it in your mind. A problem with this theory when applied, is that two different people having the same thought, will have the identical brain activity. But the thoughts of one person are subjective to their personal experiences and the context which they attribute to that thought. This makes it very difficult to prove that there are set physical movements in the brain for every separate thought, as thoughts or experiences in the mind can differ ever so slightly. Reductive materialists have rebutted this critique, by stating that there are two different distinctions of thoughts, and they label these as the 'type ' and the 'token '. The 'type ', refers to the thing which is shared by the two people, for example, they 're both feeling pain. The 'token ', refers to the particularity of the type, so the subtle difference between the pain each person is experiencing. Therefore, the events in the brain will be of the same type, but of a different token, (one person may have C-fibres firing in their brain, while the other has B-fibres firing).…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Here’s something that might sound crazy, but is nonetheless taken seriously by many philosophers: Not only do humans and other animals have minds, but even plants and bacteria have minds. Further, even so-called inanimate objects like grains of sand, droplets of water, and even individual atoms each have their own minds. Maybe the mind of a grain of sand is simpler than the mind of a human being, but it is a mind nonetheless. Everything has its own mind. This is panpsychism.…

    • 5741 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume and Self Existance

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cited: Kolack, Daniel, and Garrett Thompson. The Longman Standard History of Philosophy. New York: Pearson…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Timaeus

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Popkin, Richard H. Columbia History of Western Philosophy, The. NY: Columbia UP, 2005. (ISBN 0231101295) (B72.C593 1999), pp.32-52…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The productive forces tend to develop throughout history. (The productive forces are the means available for transforming nature to satisfy human wants. Raw materials, tools, labor power, technological knowledge about how to produce goods with various inputs, are all examples of productive forces.) 2. The nature of the productive relations of a given society is explained by the level of development of its productive forces (to a far greater extent then the reverse). (The productive relations are relations involving people and control of productive forces. Examples: The capitalist hires workers. The boss owns the factory. The serfs born on a feudal manor are required by enforced custom to remain there and work sometimes for the benefit of the lord of the manor. As Marx states in the 1859 “Preface to the Critique of Political Economy,” “The sum total of these relations of production [in a given society] constitutes the economic structure of society.” The explanatory relation involved here is functional explanation. Example: An anthropologist might claim that the fact that the practice of rain dance rituals fosters or is functional for social cohesion explains the presence of rain dance rituals in a given society. To complete a functional explanation, the anthropologist needs to cite a causal mechanism the leads from being functional to being established in society. The anthropologist might observe that a social elite that desires social cohesion might see that rain dance rituals would foster social cohesion and act deliberately to install the practice. An auxiliary cause might be that what promotes social cohesion tends to make ordinary people happy and ordinary people, seeing (perhaps dimly) that rain dance rituals are linked to their happiness in this way, support the continuance of the practice. Here there are two cases to consider. In a stable…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Books are arranged on the shelves according to the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), which groups the fields of knowledge into 10 main classes, namely:…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays