Preview

“There Is Nothing Supernatural About a Near Death Experience”.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“There Is Nothing Supernatural About a Near Death Experience”.
25/02/2011

Adolescence

Learning Outcomes
• By the end of the lecture, and with additional reading, students should: - be able to articulate the two system hypothesis - be aware of the evidence in support of differential rates of maturation in the socio-emotional and cognitive control systems - be aware of the theoretical implications of differential rates of maturation in the socio-emotional and cognitive control systems

PY0004 Chris Pawson http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QNO9xDADB 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbsQKd9ELf4&f eature=related

Studying Adolescence
• Study of adolescent thinking dominated by Piagetian theory until the 1980s • Accepted by most textbooks but not empirically testable • Search for framework of understanding for 25 years • Conventional models of adolescent thinking do not adequately account for adolescent behaviour

A puzzle to ponder….
• Research clearly shows that, by age 16, individuals show adult levels of performance on tasks of basic information processing and logical reasoning • But in real world situations adolescents show poorer judgment than adults

APA Perspectives on Abortion and Juvenile Culpability
Hodgson vs Minnesota (APA Amicus brief to court) By age 14 most adolescents have developed adult-like intellectual and social capabilities including specific abilities outlined in the law as necessary for understanding treatment alternatives, considering risks and benefits, and giving legally competent consent

Roper vs Simmons (APA Amicus brief to court)
Given that 16- and 17-year olds as a group are less mature developmentally than adults, imposing capital punishment on such adolescents does not serve the judicially recognised purposes of the sanction

1

25/02/2011

A Bad Press for the APA
• Scalia on Psychologists The APA which claims in this case that scientific evidence show persons under 18 lack the ability to take moral responsibility for their decsisions, has previously taken precisely the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard A Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Young Killers' By Richard Serrano
    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page

    Richard A Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Young Killers' By Richard Serrano

    Teens are not always aware of the consequences to their actions and they take risks. The general argument made by Richard A. Serrano in his work, Young killers serving life without parole may get chance at freedom, is that juveniles who commit heinous crimes are not fully aware of their actions. More specifically, Serrano argues that juveniles are not fully matured and juveniles should not be charged as adults. The author asserts, “Adolescents, because of their immaturity, should not be deemed as culpable as adults…”(Serrano). In this passage, Serrano is suggesting that immaturity leads teens to act inappropriate for their age because they have not yet become adults. Serrano also states, “But they also are not innocent children whose crimes…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Greg Ousley Case
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Greg Ousley Case

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Case Study
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study
    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    Simmons was written by Justice Kennedy, and was joined by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Souter. Their opinion was guided by the courts then recent decision in Atkins v. Virginia on capital punishment of the mentally retarded, as well as their decision from 1989 in the case of Stanford v. Kentucky on capital punishment of juveniles age 16 and older. Justice Kennedy explained that a national consensus had formed in opposition to sentencing offenders to death who were under eighteen years old at the time of their offense (Counsel of Record, 2005). This claim was supported by observations that eighteen states did not allow capital punishment for juveniles, and twelve states had banished capital punishment entirely. Also noted was the fact that not a single state had lowered its age of execution below age eighteen since the 1989 decision of Stanford v. Kentucky, and five other states had actually raised their age of execution to at least age eighteen. Finally, in states that still allowed for juvenile execution, its practice was extremely unusual (Counsel of Record, 2005). Justice Kennedy elaborated on the consensus against using the death penalty for minors by noting that it grew much slower than the consensus found in Atkins v. Virginia. He explained that the rate was not as important as the consistency of the direction of change (Counsel of Record, 2005). All of this established an understanding that standards had evolved…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Simmons V. Juveniles Summary
    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Simmons V. Juveniles Summary

    The majority advances their argument by listing some of the mental differences between adults and juveniles such as: “susceptibility to immature behavior”, lack of control over their environment and the peers that come with it, the ability to undergo a character change. These factors were enough for the Court to find the age group a suspect class and hold that they have diminished culpability, at least to an extent that the death penalty becomes an excessive…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal
    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PSY328 final proposal

    Semple, J. & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice Anthony Kenned Case Analysis
    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Justice Anthony Kenned Case Analysis

    In this case, Roper v. Simmons, Kennedy has once again shown himself to be one of the most powerful legal activists of our times, ready to impose his own sense of morality and law upon the rest of society. In his majority opinion, Justice Kennedy cited “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” and the court find the death penalty for juveniles to be cruel and unusual punishment, and thus unconstitutional. Moreover, Justice Kennedy turned to psychology as the platform for his argument. He stated that adolescents under age of 18 lack maturity and have “a underdeveloped sense of responsibility. Secondly, he stated that juveniles are ““more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure.” Finally, he argued that “the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult. The personality traits of juveniles are more transitory, less fixed.” With the backing of American Psychological Association’s reasoning and Supreme Court’s majority opinion, the Roper decision will go down as one more milestones in the U.S. Supreme Court’s project of judicial activism and taking moral values into…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In The Article 'What The Brain Says About Maturity'
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In The Article 'What The Brain Says About Maturity'

    “This is why 16-year-olds are just as competent as adults when it comes to granting informed medical consent, but still immature in ways that diminish their criminal responsibility, as the Supreme Court has noted in several recent cases. ”(236) The author backs up his statement with the last sentence I said by using…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Sixteen Year Olds Be Tried In Adult Court Essay
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Should Sixteen Year Olds Be Tried In Adult Court Essay

    The judicial system was created to protect and hold stability in society which is why two systems were put in place, the juvenile system and the adult system. However, recently the boundaries for these two systems are growing weaker as serious juvenile offenders are getting tried in adult court. Juveniles are not authorized to drink alcohol, sign a document, gamble at a casino or vote till they are an adult. Regardless to the crime they have committed, a juvenile is a juvenile and an adult is an adult, therefore sixteen year olds should not be tried in adult court. Sixteen year olds being tried in adult court is wrong because they are able to effectively reform, their brains are not sufficiently developed and they are vulnerable to adult prisons.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kids Are Kids Until They Commit Crimes Analysis
    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kids Are Kids Until They Commit Crimes Analysis

    Over the past years Juveniles have been fighting in court for being tried as adults. Many people agree or disagree on that decision, are they Juveniles, Children, or they adults? Writers like Adam Liptak, Marjie Lundstrom, Greg Krikorian, and Paul Thompson have maelstrom the ways of the mind of teenagers or consider their committed crimes to be adjured. The things that go through a teen’s brain are starting and unbearable to hear or imagine. Between the ages of 12 through 17, minors have been committing crimes that make their way down to death row. They look at juveniles on how unreliable and inconsistent they are on making bad decisions. But often minors bring unparticular brutally attracting impulsive claims on their behalf’s on their crimes.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice System Facts
    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juvenile Justice System Facts

    Reaves, Jessica. “Should the Law Treat Kids and Adults Differently?” TIME, 17 May 01, http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,110232,00.html. Accessed 21 Feb 17.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Teenage Brain Development Not Considered in Court
    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Teenage Brain Development Not Considered in Court

    Teenagers accused of violent crimes should not be tried as adults in a court of the law. Teenagers brains are not fully developed, from the ages 13-18 a projected number of, “one percent of gray matter is lost every year in teenagers,” and these are the teens being tried as adults in court (Spinks). A growth of gray matter is an important development stage in teens. The gray matter grows mostly when the brain is stimulated through accelerated learning, social interactions and in athletics. In a teenagers brain, the stimulation occurs in the prefrontal cortex, which is located behind the forehead. If teenagers are not given the opportunity to plead their case in court, it can lead to other developmental issues. These issues can stunt other brain growths in teenagers. Thus, the growth of the frontal cortex is a study in teenage brain development. The frontal cortex becomes enhanced during young adult years, which can conclude to an undeveloped brain in teens. The adult punishments brought upon teenagers is discriminatory because of the slower brain development in teenagers. Many neuroscientists have concluded that, teenagers have a, “very immature brain structure” (Spinks). Adults have mature frontal lobes, as opposed to teenagers with non-developed and immature frontal lobes. Although the brain maturity in teens is an issue, adults continue to be biased regarding teenage crimes. Adults must consider brain development in teenagers when any teen is being accused of a crime.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juvenile Justice

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Essay: Juveniles charged as adults
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Essay: Juveniles charged as adults

    One should find it extremely hard to prosecute children as adults because it does not in most cases help them to learn from their wrong doing, young people often leave prison more bitter and dangerous than when they went in. Moreover, recent brain studies show weak impulse control in young people under age 18, prompting some states to reconsider their tough punishments (Katel, P.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Youth Offenders
    • 2430 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Youth Offenders

    It is estimated that thousands of children have been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for crimes committed at an age when they are not considered responsible enough to live away from their parents, drive, make decisions related to their education or medical treatment, vote, leave school or sign a contract. In Addition, children under the age 18 cannot legally purchase or consume alcohol, serve on juries or be drafted, because they are presumed not to have the capacity to handle adult responsibilities (Labelle, Phillips, Horton, 2006).…

    • 2430 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics