Preview

They Say I Say

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
They Say I Say
According to the article, in (Nadell, Langan, & Comodromos, 2011), “Talk about Editing”, by, David Shipley, pg. 292-294, talks about Op-Ed essays that are edited. I like the fact, that once it is edited it will not be published unless, it is approved by the writer. One way to respond to an author’s work when editing, is letting them know that a certain area of the essay not sounding right or is confusing. I agree that it is a good idea to have the writers work edited before it is sent out, because you may make some mistakes that were missed. When I am writing a letter or email at work, sometimes I like to have someone look at it prior to sending it out. This also helps me to understand my writing and what I need to improve.

In reading, “They say/I say”, by, Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2010), pg. 55-67, it talks about three different ways to respond. The complexity, subtlety, and originality of your response are more likely to stand out and be noticed if readers have a sense of where you stand relative to any ideas you’ve sited (pg. 57). The templates that are provided will make it easier to start the discussions when needing to respond to another writer 's work. I think writers that work together, to edit’s each other’s work, would help each other gain knowledge and enhance their writing skills. When editing a person’s essay they are editing the work, and it is nothing personal towards the writer.

References:

Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2010). “They Say/ I Say” (2nd edition ed.). Chapter 4, (pg. 55-67)

Nadell, J., Langan, J.,& Comodromos, E. A. (2011). “Talk About Editing”. In The Longman Writer (pg. 292-294).



References: Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2010). “They Say/ I Say” (2nd edition ed.). Chapter 4, (pg. 55-67) Nadell, J., Langan, J.,& Comodromos, E. A. (2011). “Talk About Editing”. In The Longman Writer (pg. 292-294). Pearson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nancy Sommers studies the problem of revision between students writers and more experienced writers. Those writers who are students focus more on the revision as fixing small errors and textual repetition, when more experienced writers focus on revision more generally, not only on the repetition of the words, but also on the repetition of the concept and ideas. This allows to the writers to do not get stack on superficial errors and let their ideas flow on the paper and to get across to the audience.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Burro Genius

    • 13815 Words
    • 56 Pages

    Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: Norton, 2007.…

    • 13815 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BA 2196 F14 Syllabus

    • 4163 Words
    • 23 Pages

     Effective tools to ‘edit’ your own writing: ways to write clearly, concisely, and correctly…

    • 4163 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Panopticism's Difficulty

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages

    English Dept. of Quinnipiac University. “Part Seven: Editing Grammar.” The College Writers Reference. 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River: New Jersey, 2008. 335-350.…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say, I Say

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the book They Say, I Say by Birkenstein and Graff, the first chapter discusses the process of making a more engaging essay and also how to discuss what you think about the subject or how you feel about what author has said in the essay. One of the processes that chapter one focuses on is the "They say, I say" process which basically is a way of discussing opposing views and debating with an argument that can be applied from the writing, it is having an engaging discussion in which one person is talking about what the other might say in order to counter the argument by using that point to make their point on why they are correct (Birkenstein, Graff 8). Throughout the first chapter we are introduced to many authors such as George Orwell,…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zinczenko, David. “Don’t Blame the Eater.” They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd ed. Ed. Gerald…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Work is written in Standard Edited English with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolff V. Mcdonnell

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Clemens , B. (2002). Invitation to corrections: with built-in study guide. (p.471,). Pearson Custom Publishing. Retrieved from http://wow.coursesmart.com…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OL125 journal rubric

    • 425 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Journals are private and between you and the instructor only. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply what you learn each…

    • 425 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being the star athlete that you are, you kindly agree and step into the goal box. Not even two minutes into the game, three forwards on the opposing team sprint towards you at tremendous speeds. They strategically pass the ball to one another until they fire the ball at the goal. Thanks to your lightning speed, you are able to tip the ball over the net and secure the save for your team. Just like being a goalie is your team’s last line of defense, editing is your paper’s. The editing process is crucial for your paper’s success and can help you catch some of your grammar mistakes that could interfere with the reader’s…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Style (10 pts.)The writer chooses words carefully for rhetorical effect. In addition, the writer demonstrates careful revision through mature diction, use of the present tense, sentence variation, thoughtful phrasing, avoidance of the passive voice, and the appropriate use of transitions. (See attached for minimum guidelines.)…

    • 1279 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If I were a legislature and wanted to propose laws that would abolish the mandatory minimum sentencing, I would focus on evidence that suggests these statutes are the root cause for overcrowding and financial burdens to government budgets (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Because every state in the union has been affected by mandatory minimum sentencing, I would also capitalize on the trends of other states releasing prisoners’ early and abolishing similar sentencing laws (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the revision phase of the writing process, writers examine the content of their writing. Writers review their text for clarity and craft and consider changes that would improve the piece. The first five traits are essential for effective revision of the content: Ideas, Organization, Voice, Word Choice, and Sentence Fluency. Based on their own critical review and feedback, writers may keep elements of the writing as well as make revisions as they add, delete, move, or change…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 7: Discuss the AICPA list of effective writing characteristics. Which are editing skills and which are composing skills?…

    • 470 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In doing so, Sommers supports her argument that the current revision process taught in schools, as part of a general, linear writing process, is failing to prepare students to be critical thinkers and to use their critical thinking skills to identify bigger issues in their writing and become good writers (Sommers 327). She argues that the reason for this failure is the perpetual view of writing as a comparison to oratory (Sommers 323). Hence, students focus too much on the actual words and not enough on what they want to do with the words; they worry about following the rules rather than getting their ideas across on paper (Sommers 326-327). Similarly, she argues that students believe the purpose of revision is to identify the technical mistakes within their papers; this perspective is distinct from experienced writers who view revision as a time to rethink their missions and the best ways to execute them in writing (Sommers 328). Sommers’ use of students’ perspectives on revision as compared to experienced writers’ perspectives is a clear example of how students are learning a fallacy in the classroom regarding their writing. They are learning that writing is founded on rules and teachers’ expectations rather than on their own opinions and…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics