Preview

Tiberius Gracchus

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tiberius Gracchus
Tiberius Gracchus
University of Phoenix

Tiberius Gracchus
Tiberius Gracchus was a Roman statesman, whose concern for the common people led to his political downfall and death (msn.encarta). He attempted to enact a law that would limit the amount of land a person could own. Several senators were opposed to this law because they would have the most to lose. On one side, the senate viewed his actions an attempt to repair an unstable and weakening social system. It was viewed on the other side as nothing more than a power move on the Aristocrats ideas of the period. One must consider the conditions of Rome during this time. For the duration of the Punic Wars, the Roman Empire underwent several transformations, in which the Senate became the absolute power. The senate consisted of 300 senators who owned land and controlled elections and legislation. The senate was divided into two parties, the Optimaltes (“aristocrats”) and the Populares (“democrats”). The Optimates worked through the senate and traditional areas (wealthy people), while the Populares worked through the turbinate and popular assemblies (common people). When Tiberius retuned to Rome, after saving a Roman army, he became a champion for the common people. The recent conquest of Rome had launched many opportunities to new found wealth, but the sudden change opened more doors of corruption and wrongdoing. Tiberius saw an opportunity to achieve his own power, but also in stabilizing the inequality through modifying laws to benefit the common people.
He was elected tribune of the people in 133 B.C., and obtained legislation providing for a more equal distribution of public lands between the smaller farmers. Tiberius introduced the land bill, Lex Agraria, which proposed to allocate land to landless citizens. Why would a member of a rich and politically powerful family want to fight for the poor? What would Tiberius have to gain by doing so? What was the outcome of this land bill? Tiberius was in office



References: Cross, Suzanne. (2009). JULIUS CAESAR: THE LAST DICTATOR. Available from http://web.mac.com/heraklia/Caesar/index.html. Knox, E.L. (n.d) The Roman Revolution. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://history.boisestate.edu/westciv/romanrev/10.shtml Unknown. (n.d). Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus. Retrieved July 17, 2009, from http://www.gracchus.esmartweb.com/paper.htm "Tiberius Gracchus," Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2009 http://encarta.msn.com

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tiberius is famously known for his attempts to pass a law called agrarian and his consequence was death at the hands of…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 31 BC, Tiberius brutally suppressed a rebellion led by the commander of the Praetorian Guard, Lucius Aelius Sejanus. Tiberius had the commander’s…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tiberius Army Influence

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is conveyed when Tiberius reduced his role when he retired to Capri – therefore determining that the princeps did not have to be based in Rome to rule-, assigning much of his power over to the Praetorian Guard Prefect Sejanus, who, Tacitus records Tiberius could speak “freely and unguardedly” with Sejanus regarding him as “the partner in my labours.” Ibid justifies what Tacitus is saying by “Tiberius believed him disinterested and listened trustingly to his advice, however disastrous”. Tiberius’ role is severely reduced during his time in Capri, as Sejanus was responsible for all communication between the Senate and the Princeps, much of which he intercepted as a means of corrupting the emperor so he could become Princeps, this is identified by Tacitus who suggests that “the ambitious Sejanus had his eyes on the Principate.” However Sejanus’ plans were discovered, the Praetorian Guard had grown more powerful in the absence of Tiberius from Rome, comprehends how influentially powerful the army has become in such a short amount of…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Owners of latifundias operated at lower costs than did owners of smaller holdings. These owners often resulted to mortgaging their lands to aristocrats due to the fact that they could not compete with the latifundias. Thus, causing unemployment and famines for this class. These peasants moved to cities, where they became “mobs”. Wealthy patricians often hired people into personal armies. Civil wars i.e. Caesar and Pompey, often broke out between high ranking officials, thus leading to political instability. During the first and second century CE of Rome, there were social tensions due to the unequal land distribution. As a way to mend the unequal land distribution issue, reformers attempted to redistribute the land, i.e. Gracchi Brothers, Tiberius and Gaius. Unfortunately these men did not succeed due to the fact that most members of the wealthy and ruling classes disagreed with the ideas of the brothers and found their way around their redistribution method. In fact, this action caused them to pay a high price – their lives. For fear that the brothers would have a greater effect on Roman affairs, their enemies had them assassinated. Wang Mang, just as the Gracchi Brothers had attempted with Rome, tried to reform the distribution of land in China.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Gracchus brothers Tiberius, Gaius were members of the plebeians. They wanted to do many things to help out Rome. The brothers made land reforms to help the landless poor. This system involved recruiting the urban and rural poor people. Tiberius and Gaius took land from the rich and gave it to the small farmers so they would have some land to feed off of and be able to make money.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tiberius Gracchus had several motivations to reform. The first one was that the Tiberius’s energy and ambition on political because Tiberius wanted to recover public land for poor people, this assumption was based on some writing was posted on house-walls, porticoes, and monuments. The second motivation could be coming from Tiberius wanted to avenge his humiliation, since Tiberius rejected the 137 surrender terms, this behavior assumed that Tiberius wanted to against the senate on purpose in public; however, at the same time Tiberius was supported by the prominent senior senators as well, they provided huge power on Tiberius's reform. The third motivation could be that Tiberius wanted to safeguard the interests of the military. Since most Rome's…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He proposed the law in hopes that it would aid the many troubles of Rome at the time. He wanted to assist the poor and ease tensions and instability in the urban regions. However, his actions to safeguard this law were unconstitutional and unprecedented. He looked past the law in order to get his own way without much thought of others. These selfish notions are what led to his death and downfall. Even with all of this in consideration, his rivals’ approach to hinder his reelection were even more lawless than Tiberius’ actions in attempts to preserve the agrarian law. Despite the fact that the Romans were aggressive, their actions of attacking and killing Tiberius and his supporters were unjustifiable. There are other ways to stop Tiberius’s reelection. It is possible that voters would decide against reelecting him, which could have prevented his…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a good for the Romans because some people don’t have the money to rebuild their property so the can sell it to Crassus. Also when Crassus sells the land he rebuilt people who want to by it can. 5. What did the person do that was detrimental for the people of Rome? (Be sure to explain why each thing he did was bad for the Romans)…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps Tiberius had seen a way to solve all this and to strengthen the security of Rome's army with his land reform. With this, he became popular and gained a large clientelae. He had also set some precedents by bypassing the Senate and proposing the land bill directly to the Assembly rather than showing the Senate first. He had tried for tribune for a second year. Both these precedents had shown the tribunes what they do with their power, and how to use it properly (or…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is because the actions of Tiberius Gracchus did seem revolutionary to many. For example when he disregarded the authority of the Senate by bringing his land-bill that states that no one is allowed to hold 500 iugera of land and that the children could occupy half the amount straight to the Popular Assembly without going through the Senate (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 9). His actions were based on his knowledge that there will be no fair hearing as most of the senators owned large properties and will be the ones with the biggest loss if the land bill was passed (Scullard 1982 : 26). Other than that, when Tiberius Gracchus passed the law on redistribution of land, the wealthy who are blinded by greed strongly opposed the law and accused Tiberius Gracchus of attempting revolution (Plutarch Gracc. Ex. 9). The event where Tiberius Gracchus decided to run as tribune for the second year without election made it further seem that he was suggesting dictatorship (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 15). Evidence of his political motives can also be seen after the death of King Attalus III of Pergamum. On the will of King Attalus III, it is stated that the Roman people were to inherit the throne of the King. Once again, without regard of the senate’s authority over financial and foreign affairs, Tiberius Gracchus immediately suggested a bill that this inheritance should be used to…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The importance of the Gracchi brothers (Tiberius and Gaius) in Roman history cannot be overestimated. Most scholars would say that the actions of the Gracchi brothers was one of the most important events in Roman history.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays