Preview

Time to Kill

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Time to Kill
Writing Report

Similarity one
12 Angry Men and a Time to Kill

The play, 12 Angry Men, and the film, A Time to Kill, have a similar theme. In 12 Angry Men, a Latino is accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict would mean a death sentence. In A Time to Kill, a black man took the law into his own hands, killing two alleged rapists and the sentence for this man, if found guilty meant death in a gas chamber. The play and film both involve prejudice against two commonly accused minorities in America. All jurors were white and with the combination of racism it made it seem like injustice was certain. For example, Jake Brigance, the lawyer for Carl Lee filed for a change of venue. The reason for this was that he knew the jury would be comprised of white jurors, where his client was of African American decent. He knew that a white jury would be racially prejudicial towards an African American defendant. At this time in America, such an assertion would not have been unfounded.
Similarly, in 12 Angry Men racial prejudice towards the Latino boy was also apparent. At one point of time it seemed like the Latino boy would be executed, because nearly everyone would have found him guilty. It was stated that “So far eleven jurors are predisposed to convict him of the murder charges, only one juror, Mr. Davis believed his innocence.” If the jury system was not based on unanimous consent, then the Latino boy would have died. This is simply due to racial prejudice and it is purely unjust. In a court of law, the jury is the fact finder and not a social commentator. Similarly, most of the jurors in A Time to Kill were inclined to convict Carl Lee, because the film showed several scenes where the jury was discussing the case and a show of hands in regards to a guilty verdict was requested and most lifted their hand. This is very similar to 12 Angry Men where the race determines innocence or guilt. Justice in both cases was nearly decided on the color of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. If the jury of Jefferson’s trial was made up of both whites and blacks, how would it…

    • 710 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article is a good bias source especially because it is about these two men who have both different races. All of which explains why neither side in the Martin/Zimmerman saga is defending the basic fairness of our judicial system. Both agree that America’s courts are biased. They just disagree about whom they’re biased against. “We live in a world where there isn’t equal justice. This case never, never would have been brought if the races were reversed,” said one TV pundit the day after the verdict. Al Sharpton? No, Ann Coulter, arguing that America’s judicial system is massively skewed against whites. “If Floridians are of a mind to let off a little steam, they might usefully burn down the Sanford courthouse and salt the earth. The justice system revealed by this squalid trial is worth rioting over,” added a well-known columnist. Cornel West? No, National Review’s Mark Steyn, arguing that the trial was absurdly slanted against Zimmerman.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he case of Tom Robinson in the novel “To Kill A Mockingbird” and the report of Emmett Till are very similar, and in some cases quite different. Some similarities are the prejudice people in the south, both court cases where there were all white, male jurors and judges, and the side with blacks on it always lost, even though they should’ve won. Some differences are the time period, the case of Emmett Till took place 20 years after the Tom Robinson case, in Robinson’s case, he was the defendant, and in Till’s, he was the prosecutor, Robinson’s case was a one time thing, where Till’s was revisited in 2004.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The jury for the Emmett Till murder trial was made up of all white males and they acquitted Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam of all charges. The jury knew that they were going to rule the men not guilty so they remained in their conference room for a longer period of time to make it look believable. The black people involved in this trial were outraged because they did not get the fair trial that they deserved. This was the last straw for most blacks…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: Nine young black boys riding in an open train car were involved in a fight. When the fight ceased, two white women claimed the black boys raped them. Once the boys got off the train in Scottsboro, Alabama, police picked them up and placed them in jail. The men appeared in court, frightened, and unrepresented. The defendants were charged with a capital offence and therefore had the right for counsel to be appointed to them by the court. However, the court decided to call on the lawyers from the surrounding area. Of course no lawyer came to their defense. The day before the case, on April 6, a lawyer took their case. Because he was not able to prepare an adequate defense 8 of the 9 defendants were convicted and sentenced to death.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jena 6

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On September 2006 in Jena, Louisiana a black student asked for permission from a school teacher to sit under the shade of a tree but only white students sat under that tree I was called the white tree. School officials told the black students that they could sit wherever they wanted to sit and they did. The next day three nooses, in the school colors, were seen hanging from the white tree. The school principal found out that three white students were responsible for hanging the three nooses. The principal recommended that the three white students be expelled but the white superintendent over ruled the principal and gave the three students a three day suspension. The superintendent did not expel the students because he believed that the nooses were only a youthful stunt. When black students found out about the nooses they decided to organize a sit in under the tree to protest the lenient treatment given to the noose hanging white students. Racial tensions remained elevated throughout the fall but on Monday, December 4, 2006, a white student who allegedly had been racially taunting black students in support of the students who hung the nooses got into a fight with the black students. Allegedly the white student was taken to the hospital for treatment for being beat but he was later released and attended a social function later that day. As a result of the incident six black students were arrested and charged with attempted second degree murder. All six of the black students were expelled from school and were charged with 140,000 dollars or less bail. On the morning of the trial the District Attorney reduced the charged with attempted second degree murder to second degree aggravated battery and conspiracy. The prosecutor was allowed to argue with the jury that the tennis shoes worn by Bell could be considered a dangerous weapon. When the pool of potential jurors was summoned fifty white people appeared. The jury…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    O.J. Simpson was convicted of murdering his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. There are three crucial factors with the evidence against him. First, the L.A.P.D. has been proven corrupt and racially biased. Second, the evidence, including blood samples, and the glove from the scene of the crime. Third, the juries from during the trial were all mainly African American, so they began to have a race issue. Everyone has their own implication of how the verdict should continue if the evidence fits, he is guilty if the evidence does not fit he will be found not guilty!…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scottsboro Trial Report

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    I was a juror at a Scottsboro trial today. As I sat down I had noticed that the jurors around me were almost all white which seemed almost peculiar. Once the court case began, I had heard the side of the lovely Victoria Price and Ruby Bates. Everything that they claimed seemed possible and is most likely what happened to those two poor ladies. Looking at those African-Americans defending themselves filled me with even more anger and hate towards their kind. Why would they do such a thing towards innocent white women and then continue to spit out lies? The boys seemed to have no valid defense and factual evidence to support their case and should be ashamed of themselves for trying to spread lies to the people watching. Victoria, however, had…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Robinson’s case in To Kill A Mockingbird resembles many Civil Rights Cases, specifically in the case of Powell vs. Alabama. In Powell vs. Alabama, several young white men…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without question, the O.J. Simpson trial revealed that the race conversation was not over. The O.J. Simpson trial represented the frustration that black Americans felt towards the criminal justice system. When the black community celebrated O.J. Simpson’s acquittal, they were celebrating a victory against a system that persecuted black men…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Twelve Angry Men tells a story of a tainted jury nearly sending a nineteen year old from the slums of Chicago to death row with reasons based solely on bias. Two of the narrow-minded jurors include Juror Three; a sadist, and Juror Ten; a bigot. The entirety of the play is Juror Eight attempting to give a man a fair trial while others would rather send him to death, than discussing the fact he might be innocent. Rose, through Juror Eight, forces the jurors to ask themselves why they are so convinced he is guilty and why they have such biased toward him, and one juror responds “I just think he’s guilty. I thought it was…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice of Tom Robinson

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable... Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.” (Martin Luther King,Jr.) This famous quote from Martin Luther King, JR. talks about the step towards justice that every human should receive, no matter what the color of their skin is. But, you can ask yourself: what is justice? There are many different definitions for justice and it has become used so loosely in today’s world. Justice is often used interchangeably with the word “fairness.” In any type of situation whether it be in the classroom, at work, or in the courtroom, we want to be treated fairly and not judged by the color of our skin. Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, religion, and fairness, as well as the administration of the law, the right of all people to equal protection before the law of their civil rights, without discrimination on the basis of race, gender, color, ethnicity, religion, disability, age or other characteristics. In the case of Tom Robinson in How to Kill a Mockingbird he did not receive justice.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One form of racial injustice in court was portrayed in To Kill a Mockingbird. Tom Robinson, a colored man, was convicted of raping and beating a white woman without any evidence besides some lousy witnesses. As said by Atticus in the book, “But this is a truth that applies to the human race and to no particular race of men. There is not a person in this courtroom who has never told a lie, who has never done an immoral thing…” (Harper Lee 47). Without a doubt this is totally correct. We…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays