To kill a mockingbird analysis

In present day many movies have been adapted into books but this isn't something new. During history, many ways of entertainment have been created. From the earliest days of cinema,in nineteenth-century Europe, adaptations from such diverse resources has been an ubiquitous practice of film-making. This is called a film adaptation which is defined as the transfer of a written work in whole or part to a feature film. I've watched several movies related with books so by experience I've notice that even though some movies may be based in book stories they present some differences among. To start with: Have you ever realized how a book and a movie be compared? Books and movies are both written. When watching a movie you can see and hear the details, where as when reading a book you are able to imagine them, and create the picture in your head. Novels and feature films both tell stories about characters. Adaptations will always include saving time situations in which some events in the book are not showed to make the film short. There are so many saving time examples shown in the movie. One of them is how you never see Scout's teacher in the movie so the fact of how Miss Caroline treats Scout for already knowing how to read. Also her way of teaching with the Dewey Decimal System isn't shown. The event where Jem and Scout reads to Mrs. Dubois while she recovers is left out. Another case in which something is left out is when Calpurnia worries about the kids not being in the house so she goes to the court to notice Atticus about it before noticing they were sneaking into the colored balcony. When Jem and Scout go to Calpurnia's black church with her isn't shown. Some of the things that happen in the book are not even mentioned in the movie. For example, supposely in the movie Boo Radley never speaks but actually he said to Scout "Will you take me home?". Neither Mrs. Dubose nor Mr. Underwood are mentioned. Dill and Scout carry on a romance but this doesn't happen