To What Extent Is Truth Different in Mathematics, the Arts and Ethics?
To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics?
As the great Socrates ones said, that by admiting that you dont know anything, so you can learn something that is how I discover the things that I want to know. The only way of knowing things is the way of becoming conscious of our unknowing, so we can learn. Awareness of the unknowing is the beginning of knowledge. Thus, we can always look for the truth, but the best is if never said that we found it. We may just think of the truth. We may think of what is the truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics, but let’s never be sure. That is the only way how we are going to become bigger and better people.
The truth in mathematics is that we think every part of it is proved. Every formula is derived and every one of sums is solved before we solved them. We suppose that the only thing we can question is the origin of math’s and if that has solid and secure, but is it? The association amid common sense and mathematics at their collective ground rules is looked after the recurrent question in the philosophy of mathematics. On one hand mathematical truths seem to have a believable obviousness, but on the other hand the source of their "straightforwardness" relics indistinguishable. This is a philosophical mystery.
Regardless of the fact that mathematics seems as the clearest and most affirmative sort of knowledge we own, there are tribulations. We want to know the character of mathematics. We want to know the significance of the propositions. Many philosophers had different ideas of mathematics, such as Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle and latter Kant and Descartes. Pythagoras made influential contributions to mathematics and he is best known for the Pythagorean Theorem, named after him. It was his idea that mathematics is a protected foundation for philosophical thinking over and above for considerable thesis and ethics. He says that the ideology of mathematics is the ideology of all things.
As the great Socrates ones said, that by admiting that you dont know anything, so you can learn something that is how I discover the things that I want to know. The only way of knowing things is the way of becoming conscious of our unknowing, so we can learn. Awareness of the unknowing is the beginning of knowledge. Thus, we can always look for the truth, but the best is if never said that we found it. We may just think of the truth. We may think of what is the truth different in mathematics, the arts and ethics, but let’s never be sure. That is the only way how we are going to become bigger and better people.
The truth in mathematics is that we think every part of it is proved. Every formula is derived and every one of sums is solved before we solved them. We suppose that the only thing we can question is the origin of math’s and if that has solid and secure, but is it? The association amid common sense and mathematics at their collective ground rules is looked after the recurrent question in the philosophy of mathematics. On one hand mathematical truths seem to have a believable obviousness, but on the other hand the source of their "straightforwardness" relics indistinguishable. This is a philosophical mystery.
Regardless of the fact that mathematics seems as the clearest and most affirmative sort of knowledge we own, there are tribulations. We want to know the character of mathematics. We want to know the significance of the propositions. Many philosophers had different ideas of mathematics, such as Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle and latter Kant and Descartes. Pythagoras made influential contributions to mathematics and he is best known for the Pythagorean Theorem, named after him. It was his idea that mathematics is a protected foundation for philosophical thinking over and above for considerable thesis and ethics. He says that the ideology of mathematics is the ideology of all things.