Preview

To What Extent Was Metternich Responsible for Change in Germany in 1815

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Metternich Responsible for Change in Germany in 1815
‘To what extent was Metternich responsible for the lack of change in Germany between 1815-1848’
Metternich was the chancellor of Austria and therefore had a substantial amount of power, this enabled him to make radical decisions regarding Germany, whether it included unifying it or not.
On one hand Metternich had a major influence with the lack of change in Germany. This was largely to do with the fact that he continuously over exaggerated the importance of the student movements. An example of this is that in 1819 a member of an extreme student group murdered Kotzebue, a reactionary writer and a secret agent of the Russian Tsar. This murder prompted Metternich to take action. This resulted in ‘The Carlsbad decrees’, these provided inspectors for universities, student societies were disbanded, press censorship introduced to and a commission set up to investigate revolutionary movements. Consequently these actions stunted the student movement towards unification because Metternich prioritized the communication via universities and newspapers to be stopped. A main idea for liberalisation is freedom of the press, Metternich continuously utilised censorship of the press which was another reason for halting unification.

Communication via news papers and universities was not the only way in which liberal and national ideas were spreading. Another way was by the meeting of south German states. Metternich saw this as a major threat to the ‘status quo’ and therefore made it more difficult for liberal ideas to gain ground by persuading all the states to restrict the subjects which their assemblies could discuss. This stunted unification because it made the liberalist and nationalist ideas hard to spread.

Another way in which Metternich was responsible for the lack of change in Germany was that he attacked the nationalist ideas himself; Unification of religion was a main focus for nationalists, yet in Germany the north was protestant, and the south and west were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the political status quo through more than just the policy of moderate reform, I would argue. Certainly the policy of moderate reform helped placate and divide socialists and liberals, the groups demanding social and constitutional change, to an extent. However, it is clear that the inflexible constitution itself that kept the ultimate power always in the Kaiser’s hands succeeded in maintaining the political status quo to a much further extent. The nationalism and patriotism upholding the Kaiser’s constitutional powers were very significant, as the vast majority of the German population and the breadth of the political nation valued the Kaiser, so he did not face any serious challenges in this period. This nationalism and patriotism was particularly felt by the traditional elites, who the constitution favoured, and pressed for nationalist foreign policy to unite against threats to the status quo, which did soak up a lot of the tensions of the period. It should also be noted despite this attempt to present a united front against threats to the status quo, parties looking after sectional interests meant that a disunity of the parties in the Reichstag did little for the cause of significant political modernisation, unable to work together to make any coherent challenges.…

    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismark Attack Paper

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the King of Prussia asked Bismark to be his Prime Minister, he wanted Bismark to unite all Germans under one power, and one crown. He had a parliament that wouldn’t pay their military and needed a way to get all Germans from the Saxons, Bavarians and Hessians to unite and become a stronger country.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the years 1900-1914 there was arguably a significant move towards democracy within Germany. There were general desire for political and social reform and many wished for constitutional change. However, come 1914 Germany still remained nearly as autocratic as it had been back in 1900. Over this period it can clearly be shown through 3 key areas: the Constitution, German policy and events, that, regardless of attempted moves towards democracy, Germany truly was an entrenched autocracy in this period.…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the First World War broke out in 1914 the political divisions that had existed before narrowed as the German people became united in the defence of their country. The Kaiser’s declaration that he ‘knew no political parties, only Germans’, is evidence and a reflection of the national sense of patriotism that was felt throughout the Germany at the outbreak of war. The division between the right and the left ceased to exist with the SPD voting for war credits as did the clear division by the poor and the rich with men from the countryside as well as the towns joining together to fight. However, as the war progressed, the resentment towards the war began to grow; this was due to the fact that Germany had experienced huge losses and also because of the economic crisis that they were facing. Therefore, because of this, the First World War increased the political divisions in Germany.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gustav Stresemann led Germany through a very difficult period in their history. He had to contend with economic hardships, political turbulence and much more. In this essay, I will examine his tenure as Chancellor, and the ways in which he was able to achieve stability.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the impact of World War One took its toll on Europe countries like Russia, Italy and Germany were in dire need of a change. Germany was most impacted by the war and was left in a state where everyday citizens were homeless, jobless, and starving. Looking for someone save Germany, Germans were in a desperate need for change and turned to group of radicals that were rising in power at a rapid rate known as the Nazis. Looking for someone to “save Germany” the Nazi’s unconventional but radical beliefs gave many Germans a strong sense of hope. “One of the reasons the Nazi ideology was so successful in eliciting support for the party and consensus behind its program was that its structure was built central concepts that, in the…

    • 3069 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both, Metternich and Bismarck sought to bring unity and stability to their nations, but in different ways. While Metternich was hard at work using his diplomatic skills trying to prevent German unification during the first half of the nineteenth century, Bismarck on the other hand was known as the Iron Chancellor, in the later nineteenth century set on to unite Germany through his many wars.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was longing for a united nation with a stable economy. The Nazi party, lead by Adolf Hitler, came to power. "And then there is another fundamental error: they have never got it clear in their own minds that there is a difference or how great a difference there is between the conception 'national' and the word 'dynastic' or 'monarchistic.' They do not understand that today it is more than ever necessary in our thoughts as Nationalists to avoid anything which might perhaps cause the individual to think that the National Idea was identical with petty everyday political views. They ought day by day to din into the ears of the masses: 'We want to bury all the petty differences and to bring out into…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He realized the political and geographical chaos within Germany after the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815. This was greatly due to the high number of local battles and internal wars within the un-unified Germany. The existence of these struggles was mainly because, through the congress’s “balance of power”, European powers were limited to reduce the possibility of the uprising of continental strength which might oppose a threat to Europe. Bismarck, being and opportunistic politician did not like the situation of anarchy and took in hand the responsibility to unify Germany, and by mass election of the people he up rose in between the mid 19th century. This characteristic trait and behaviour made him an untrustworthy figure in the eyes of his political allies, why? Simply, they worried that such an opportunistic symbol such as Bismarck would un-doubtfully take advantage of a vulnerable situation, like he did in Germany, and introduce a setback, which in turn may misdirect Germany threat to neighbouring areas, leading to continental feud, thus damaging local trade through mercantilism, political alliances such as that between Austria and Prussia, and future democratic recessions such as those in the north German Confederation of the year 1876. Otto Von Bismarck was now the Machiavellian politician who kept the European powers on high alert through the process of signing treaties and…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gustave Stresemann had a lot of influence over Germany in the period between 1923 and 1929. Before Stresemann took charge in 1923 the Weimar Republic had many problems. In 1922 the government declared that they could no longer pay reparations to France due to severe economic problems. The French angrily responded to this by sending in 60,000 French and Belgian troops to invade the Ruhr. They took most of Germany’s raw materials, the government called for the workers to carry out passive resistance. The workers in Germany refused to collaborate with the French. Consequently industrial production ground to a halt. Many in Germany blamed the government for the invasion of the Ruhr as it was the government who signed the treaty in which the treaty stated that they had to pay large reparations to France After the invasion of the Ruhr, industrial production decreased dramatically causing industries and factories to shut down. This meant that unemployment rose rapidly and poverty in Germany rose too. The government decided to print more money to give to the people. As more and more were printed prices rose higher and higher, this meant that more money had to be printed to meet the increasing prices. As a result money became worthless. This was the second problem the Weimar Republic faced; hyperinflation. Although the wages rose the prices always seemed to rise faster this meant that many people’s income was too low to live on. Most people suffered from the hyperinflation, and were extremely fed up with how the government had printed more money. It wasn’t just the fact that all their life savings could now only buy them a loaf of bread but it was also that it was degrading and it was humiliating: the German mark and economy had become worthless. Before Stresemann the Weimar Republic was facing unpopularity amongst most people, without Stresemann the Weimar Republic might not have seen 1924.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons why the revolutionaries were not as successful as Bismarck was because of the difference in religion, culture and on the ways Germany should be ruled. First of all, the north and the south of Germany had different religions: the north was Protestants and the south Catholics. This clash between religions made the unification of Germany more…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Bismarck was the shining leader of the shining Germany during the years 1862-1890. At the time Germany was a new country where Bismarck was in charge for many things that happened inside and outside the country. He was responsible for unifying the country by using different policies. Bismarck was a conservative, which meant that he didn’t prefer changes and he felt like god made the system. As a leader Bismarck made clear that the goals of the state were more important then any other concern. In spite of this the diplomacies he used were usually planned short-term wisely, which could cause a problem for long-term settings. His most important goals were going to war with other countries, keeping peace in Europe, and of course his smart politics had a major impact in the growth of German industry.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree to a certain extent with the statement as although it initially seems that the First World War narrowed the existing political divisions within Germany in this period, as the war proceeded, the resentment greatened, in part due to huge losses and the economic crisis that prevailed over the country. Therefore because of this the political divisions increased, and by the end of the war the polarisation (division) of German politics was clear. This widen polarisation was also strengthened as left wing and right wing became more extreme- causing a wider gap within the political system.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany Before 1848

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The political, economical, and social order of the Germanic states in the nineteenth century was in a state of chaos and disarray. Politically, the states had the desire of becoming unified and had the possibility to do so if it had not been for fear and neglect to follow through. Economically, the states were in a time of hardships with poor growth development in the fields and were also going through the time of the Industrial Revolution with changes to their everyday lives. Socially, the Germanic states were divided into a feudal system that was determined by birth status and wealth. The middle class, made up of scholars and students, and aristocracy had shared the same fear of the commoners’ revolt due to the political failure in attempt to unify the Germanic states, and had wanted to maintain their rights as well as becoming unified without giving the lower class any more power. The economic structure was poor and resulted with unemployment and higher food prices, which enabled the peasants to be outraged in anger towards the government for lack of action to make the necessary changes causing them to revolt in hopes of more stability financially while also desiring a unification of the German states.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociologists

    • 27031 Words
    • 109 Pages

    • –––, 1918/1994. “Parliament and Government in Germany Under a New Political Order” in Max Weber: Political Writings.…

    • 27031 Words
    • 109 Pages
    Good Essays