Preview

Tort Law: Stella Liebeck Report

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Law: Stella Liebeck Report
Hot coffee spill worth cool award McDonald 's may fork over $2.9 million
Denver Post Copyright 1994 Friday, August 19, 1994 The Associated Press

ALBUQUERQUE - A woman, who was scalded when her McDonald 's coffee spilled won a jury award of $2.9 million - or about two days ' coffee sales for the fast-food chain. Lawyers for Stella Liebeck, 81, who suffered thirddegree burns in the 1992 incident, contended that McDonald 's coffee was too hot. A state district court jury imposed $2.7 million in punitive damages and $160,000 in compensatory damages Wednesday. Ken Wagner, one of Liebeck 's attorneys, said that he had asked the jury for punitive damages equal to two days ' worth of McDonald 's coffee sales, which he estimated at $1.34 million a day. Testimony indicated McDonald 's coffee is served at 180 to 190 degrees, based on advice from a coffee consultant who has said it tastes best that hot, Wagner said yesterday.

The lawsuit contended Liebreck 's coffee was 165 to 170 degrees when it spilled. In contrast, he said, coffee brewed at home is generally 135 to 140 degrees. Defense attorney Tracy McGee said the company will appeal. Juror Richard Anglada said the jury was trying to deliver a message to the industry. "The coffee 's too hot out there. This happened to be McDonald 's," Anglada said Wednesday. Liebeck 's lead counsel, Reed Morgan of Houston, said there have been several lawsuits nationally over the temperature of McDonald 's coffee, but that he believes the Liebeck case was the first to reach the verdict stage. A California case was settled out of court for $235,000, he said. He said the woman 's medical bills totaled nearly $10,000. According to testimony, Liebeck was a passenger in a car driven by her grandson outside a McDonald 's in southeast Albuquerque when she was burned by a cup of coffee purchased at a drive-through window. The jury found, among other things, that the coffee was defective and that McDonald 's engaged in conduct justifying

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Peterson v. Donahue, Neal Peterson sued David Donahue for negligence after a ski collision that occurred while both parties were on the ski slopes. Eleven year old Peterson was coming down the slopes very fast when he collided with forty three year old, advanced skier, Donahue who was skating across the slope toward the parking lot. Donahue saw Peterson seconds before the impact which knocked him out of his skis ten to twelve feet down the slope and knocked Peterson unconscious. Peterson sought recovery for the accident by filing a suit in the Minnesota State Court against Donahue alleging negligence.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conclusion: It is not likely that Samantha will be awarded damages for her injuries because she cannot show proof that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous spill on the…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spilled coffee is a foreseeable circumstance from going through a drive through. It was undetermined if temperature the coffee was served at was too hot. It was determined there was no breach of warranty, there was not adequate warning about the product and there was no negligence as far as the emotional damage was concerned.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: Bell v. Starbucks U.S. Brands Corp., 389 F.Supp.2d 766 (2005), United States District Court…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mims V Starbucks Case

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Kevin Keevican, Kathleen Mims, and other former managers filed a suit against Starbucks seeking unpaid overtime and other amounts.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Coffee Association advises that coffee should be brewed at 195 to 205 degree Fahrenheit for the ideal extraction and served at 180 to 185 degrees Fahrenheit. The law firm of Gallivan, White and Boyd gave their opinion that “Just because a product can cause serious injury when handled negligently doesn’t not mean that product is unreasonably dangerous when and if used properly” (The Original Hot Coffee Product Liability Case, Gwblawfirm.com). I believe the severity of Liebeck’s injuries and her old age is what made the jury feel sympathetic and side against McDonalds restaurants. Liebeck argued that there was no warning label on the McDonalds coffee cup to inform the customer. However on McDonalds promotional poster and on their website there was sample picture that showed “Caution: Contents Hot” in an orange text on the cup. In my opinion I do not think McDonalds should have been held accountable for Liebeck acting careless with hot coffee. However, McDonalds should have covered Liebeck’s medical expenses out of good faith since they could easily afford it. McDonalds sending Liebeck for $800, which didn’t even cover half of her medical bills, displays McDonalds lack of concern and sympathy for Liebeck’s horrendous injury. Even worse, from 1982 to 1992, McDonalds coffee has burned more than 700…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiffs, a child and his mother, grandmother, and father, challenged a judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio) which granted summary judgment to defendants, a restaurant franchisor and franchisee, in plaintiff's action in breach of warranty, products liability, and negligence for injuries plaintiff child received when a cup of defendants' coffee spilled in plaintiffs' vehicle.…

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ms Liebeck spilled her coffee on herself which caused her to get burned. She sustained 3rd degree burns because the coffee was brewed at a higher temperature than other restaurants. The case was ruled in favor of Ms. Liebeck. The jury declared McDonald’s negligent because their coffee was found to be 20 degrees hotter than it should have been. McDonald’s had received many complaints about their coffee being too hot and failed to do anything about it. So their actions were considered to be reckless because they did not warn their customers about the temperature of the…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    April 19, 2011 the lawsuit over Taco Bell’s beef was terminated. The California woman renounced the lawsuit willingly. Taco Bell did not change its products, ingredients or advertising. Taco Bell’s sales were suffering in February, 2011 because of the lawsuit in the United States (Stempel, J., 2011). The lawsuit valued the damages at $5,000,000 meaning that Taco Bell misrepresented the use of ingredients as seasonings (Nowak, M., 2014). The suit requested the court to require that Taco Bell to properly label its product as taco meat filling to make the public aware of the true content of its food. They provided the detailed list of their beef. The suit lasted two months. Taco Bell denied all allegations about their beef being falsely advertised.…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcq for Marketing

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Starbucks has determined that McDonald 's is testing a line of coffee houses called McCafé in a bid to take back customers lured away by coffee shops. In terms of a SWOT assessment, Starbucks would classify the McCafé concept as a potential:…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nadel Et Al

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court granted both the Burger King owner and Burger King Corporation request for motion of summary of judgments. The Nadel’s appealed. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part. The summary judgment was wrongly granted on the products liability and related punitive damage claims. Issues of fact remained as to whether the coffee was defective due to the heat at which it was served and whether an adequate warning existed. Because the alleged failure to warn involved a product, not premises, summary judgment was properly granted as to premises liability. Plaintiffs' claims of emotional damage were inadequate to support their claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 4222-208 Answers

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Burn and Scalds – when a client lifted a hot teapot and spilt the tea…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law

    • 631 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Let’s just say that the cup actually broke on its own while she was holding it, then that would be a different story. Then the lawsuit would make more sense to most people and she should be granted some kind of payment for her damages. Although McDonalds had over seven hundred complaints of hot coffee, the company itself doesn’t tell their customers when to drink it. If the coffee is too hot then wait a little while till it gets cooler. If the coffee at McDonalds is too hot for someone then go somewhere else. In this case the coffee actually was too hot for the cup itself to actually handle and led to Stella Liebeck to suffer from third degree burns.…

    • 631 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tort reform is a group of ideas and laws designed to change the way our civil justice system works. It’s designed to make it more difficult for injured people to file a lawsuit, make it more difficult for injured people to obtain a jury trial, and to place limits on the amount of money injured people receive in a lawsuit. In my opinion it's just all a load of crap that takes a dump on our already sketchy legal system. It takes the rights of the people out of court, and replaces it with laws that favor those at fault versus the victims. The hot coffee case, when you see what happened to the old woman and how McDonalds had hundreds of complaints and hundreds of burns because they kept the coffee at a temp that was capable of giving third degree burns in seconds. It makes me wonder exactly why so much advertising went in to bagging on this old woman. If a company knows there is a serious defect in their product capable of injuring people and puts it on the market anyway without informing the public, they ought to be sued.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many trial lawyers argue about the need for the tort reform. The tort reform is a cap that the civil justice system has placed on how much can be awarded in punitive damages. Many Americans see civil lawsuits as a waste of money, they believe that too much money is being given away. A lot of pressure is put on trial lawyers to not accept lawsuits that can be perceived as petty and frivolous. That is just it, though, any situation can be perceived in a completely different way. For example, having a weird and unexpected side effect to medicine can be nothing to one person, but can mean much to another person. It would all depend on the little details. There is always so much more to the story than what is written on the headlines. A small fact…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics