Preview

Trading Liberty for Illusion Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trading Liberty for Illusion Analysis
The events of 11 September 2001 inverted the actions that have led the US government to deal with criminals and terrorists in different and wide-ranging principles and measures. Standards that are mildly intrusive, coercive, and less democratic induce Security Departments to break privacies and breach human rights in the name of ‘war on terror’ The power given to the government to prevent and investigate the potential acts of terrorists was not balanced with civil liberties. These rights were guaranteed by the First Amendment “[to allow] the individuals to speak, think, assemble, worship, or petition without ‘government’ (or even private) inferences or restraints” (thefreedictionary, 2005). Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, concludes in his book, All the Laws but One: Civil Liberties in Wartime, "in any civilized society the most important task is achieving a proper balance between freedom and order" (Rehnquist, 2007, n.d.). But the events of 11 September suggest extravagant involvements introduce the security measures.
In her article, “Trading Liberty for Illusion,” Wendy Kaminer, a lawyer and the author of several books, argues how the events of the September 11 attacks have affected the civil liberties. She says that whenever something like this happens, people become afraid, which requires the government to take all the necessary precautions to secure its citizens. But she also adds that those actions go beyond the logical approach to safety. By attempting to use several surveillance devices to track criminals or abnormal behaviors, Kaminer asserts that such processes are pointless and demonstrated its failures. Kaminer, effectively, displays her claim by accusing the government of ignoring the civil liberties. In fact, issues like civil liberties, electronic surveillance, habeas corpus, and privacy rights have been fundamentally and irreversibly changed in the eye of the US government.
The level of support for civil liberties in



References: Wendy, K. (2002). Trading Liberty for Illusion. Kennedy: M. & Kennedy, W. (7th Eds.), Writing in disciplines (pp. 397-399). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Civil liberties. Thefreedictionary. (2005). Retrieved from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/civil+liberties. Daniela, L. C. (2011). Security versus Civil Liberties and Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.ias.edu/about/publications/ias-letter/articles/2011-summer/civil-liberties-caglioti. William, H.R. (1998). All the laws but one: Civil liberties in wartime. New York, NY: Random House.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The practical application of the defence power in an age of terrorism is difficult to determine, as it is reliant upon a set of circumstances that can have a plethora of different interpretations from a range of variant perspectives. Unlike some other powers, the defence power is purposive and elastic; it waxes and wanes, and its application “depends upon the facts, and as those facts change so may its actual operation as a power”[1]. Recent developments, such as the Thomas case, have led some theorists to comment that “the elastic of the defence power has become stretched all out of proportion”[2]. In its present interpretation, the defence power is no longer simply fixed on an external aggressor. Instead, the enemy is disguised domestically. It no longer depends upon judicial notice, or requires an expression of proportionality “in a context where the fact of war or piece is important”[3]. However, the reasoning behind this breed of jurisprudence is hard to decipher. The balance between liberty and safety seems to be somewhat askew. In this essay, I will attempt to argue that the defence power is, at least in its present reincarnation, excessively aggressive and at odds with other constitutional guarantors to freedom of speech.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mark R. Levin, Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto, New York: Threshold Editions, 2009. pp. 1-206. $10.00.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This assignment will be to write an opinion paper on civil liberties. Your paper should be 2-3 handwritten pages if turned in during class or 1-2 typewritten pages if placed in the drop box. Your paper will answer the following questions: What if you could only have one of the studied civil liberties? Which one would you choose and why? How would having that civil liberty but no others affect your life? The project should be turned into the drop box no later than Week 2 Saturday at noon.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    September 11, 2001 changed America forever. The 9/11 cases challenged the government power and its relation to individual rights during times of war. Al-Qaeda, a terrorist organization funded by Osama bin Laden targeted the American government in a series of deadly attacks on 9/11 that killed over 3000 people and injured scores of others. The United States declared an act of war against Terrorism and soon was heavily involved in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Similar to the Korematsu v. U.S. (1944) Supreme Court cases where Congress authorization forces the government to comply with an order. The 9/11 cases were no ordinary in nature but it was different from similar cases. One must understand the complexity of the cases and the course of action…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Ashcroft sees two broad areas of civil liberties as particular weaknesses waiting to be exploited by terrorists, free press and due process rights. He described a seized al Qaeda training manual where "terrorists are told how to use America's freedom as a weapon against us. They are instructed to use the benefits of a free press, newspapers, magazines and broadcasts, to stalk and kill their victims. They are instructed to exploit our judicial process for the success of their operations" (U.S. Senate 2001). The logic is clear: to foil the terrorist plot, the administration must enact antiterrorism measures that ensure greater governmental control of information, fewer procedural protections for people linked to terrorism (as either suspects or material witnesses), and enhanced government surveillance.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001 saw the largest loss of life of US civilians, in the US, from an outside enemy. As a result of the attacks, President Bush declared a “Global War on Terror.” To prevent another terror attack, Congress felt it must provide additional powers to US law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In 2001, Congress passed the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept or Obstruct Terrorism Acts of 2001, or colloquially referred to as the PATRIOT Act. While many will argue the PATRIOT Act is helpful in combating terrorism, critics argue it infringes on the 4th Amendment rights of US citizens.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States, the safety and protection of the American people has always been a primary ideal of the United States government. In the past five years, new technology has emerged that has aided the government in ensuring this ideal. In the novel 1984, by George Orwell, Orwell uses a dystopian society to portray a government which utilizes technology and procedures to make it seem like they are protecting the citizens, but in reality is generating fear to control and have complete power over the people. In modern America, the government has been accused of similar actions and procedures. However, the United States government does not have the same intentions. Given the domestic and international threats present, heightened security like security cameras in schools as well as other public grounds and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) are used solely for the protection and preservation of the liberty of the American people.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of this essay is to critique the United States homeland security system and its capabilities to meet both the new issues and future challenges. Besides, this exposition will address and analyze the existing efforts of apparent dichotomy that are crucial to homeland security on one hand while maintaining civil liberties on the other side.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the aftermath of September 11, Congress was eager to put laws on the books to prevent another attack. In an unprecedented spirit of bipartisan patriotism, a law was passed in the House by 357 to 66 (Clerk of the House) and in the Senate by 98 to 1 (Secretary of the Senate). The title of the act, USA PATRIOT Act, is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. Since its historic passage there has been much debate on the constitutionality of the act. Some would claim the Legislative and Executive branches acted opportunistically and enacted a law that infringes on the rights of Americans. This paper, for sake of brevity, focuses on Section 213 of the Patriot Act, the “sneak and peak” section. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the arguments on both sides of the issues and determine whether or not Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT Act is indeed unconstitutional. This paper examines the history of the Patriot Act, evaluates recent litigation concerning this act, and considers precedents that would give or withhold from Congress the authority to enact such a law.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: MAJEROL, V., & Liptak, A. (2011). The Bill of Rights, Then & Now. New York Times Upfront, 144(7), 18-21.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bush Administration

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: "American Civil Liberties Union." American Civil Liberties Union. N.p., 21 Oct. 2002. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. .…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 Dec. 2008 http://0- find.galegroup.com.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. Bader, Eleanor J. "The Patriot Act Discourages the Free Exchange of Ideas." Current Controversies: Free Speech. John Boaz. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 8 December 2008 http://0-find.galegroup.co m.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. " How Patriot Act 2 Would Further Erode the Basic Checks on Government Power That Keep America Safe and Free." American Civil Liberties Union. 30 Oct. 2002. ACLU Foundation. 2 Dec. 2008 http://w ww.aclu.org/safefree/general/17346leg20030320.html Levendosky, Charles. "Unconstitutional Sections of the Patriot Act Should Be Repealed." Opposing Viewpoints: The Patriot Act. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 December 2008 . Miller, Amy, and Ryan Lozar. "The Patriot Act Threatens Students ' Privacy…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays