Preview

Tuesdays with Morrie

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tuesdays with Morrie
Death and Life - Tuesdays with Morrie
PART 1 Nagel wrote: “everybody dies, but not everybody agrees about what death is.” In this chapter, Death, Nagel explains some of the beliefs people have about death. One of his points was survival after death. Nagel said that if dualism is true we can understand how life after death might be possible. Each person would consist of a soul and a body, and the soul would have to be able to leave the body and function on its own. If dualism is not true, then life after death could not exist because mental processes go in the brain which depend on the rest of the body. Nagel believes that life after death might be tangible if dualism is true. Nagel asserts that death, the most terrifying of things, is nothing to us. Since as long as we exist, death is not with us; but when death comes, then we do not exist. It does not then concern either the living or the dead. He explained that death can be considered a negative evil because when a person dies, their lives end. This means that there is nothing left; no love, work, food, clothing, cars or anything else. When Nagel says death has no value, positive or negative, he means to the person who has died. One's death can clearly have value to others, negative to one's family and friends, positive to one's enemies or those who profit from it. Nagel also explained that anything that is bad for someone-must be bad for that person at a particular time. There is no time at which death is bad for the one who dies. Death is not bad for someone before he dies; it is not bad for her once he dies, because from that point on she no longer exists. Nagel makes a good point when he said: “the fact that all good things in life come to an end is reason for regret.” Some people want more to enjoy in their lives. Others are terrified of death, so they live in fear, not living life to the fullest. He said that it is scary to think that when a person dies, the world with go on without them and they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I can remember how when I was young I believed death to be a phenomenon of the body; now I know it to be merely a function of the mind−and that of the minds of the ones who suffer the bereavement. The nihilists say it is the end; the fundamentalists, the beginning; when in reality it is no more than a single tenant or family moving out of a tenement or a town (42).…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nagel makes it very clear that death itself does not hold inherently positive features which make it bad. For one can not experience the state of…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    death does not represent the ultimate end to one’s life. Therefore, to Billy death does not retain…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skellig Sparknotes

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the novel “Skellig”, David Almond describes how death is natural and has to happen in order for our world to keep moving. Imagine no one dying, just the world populating over and over again. There would eventually be no room for the new boys and girls entering our world. Death is natural, and has to happen. If there was no death, there would be no new generations with new minds to think and process the information the current generation can’t.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dead do not exist. “ ( page 167 ) Therefore, death is not bad for the dead. Therefore death is bad for neither the living nor the dead.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nagel believes that we are ridiculous creatures in the sense that we can’t prove without a doubt that our projects or goals are valuable. We can’t prove that our pursuits and goals have any value due to the existence of a gap that separates how we perceive a situation and the actual reality of the given situation. By noticing that we are absurd in this sense, we can approach our pursuits and goals with a more spirited attitude in that we think that our pursuits and goals are valuable in order to elude any conflicts with others about whether or not our pursuits have value. Another way to describe this approach would be the reality that everyone has differing values that they hold and the most likely case scenario that we won’t always agree with or support their values. An example of this approach would be an individual who pursues the project of going to Cubs games whenever possible. Say this person meets an individual who dislikes baseball who deems his project has no value due to the Cubs lack of playoff success (prior to this season, of course). That individual wouldn’t take offense or feel wronged by the other’s perception of…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Nagel's Argument?

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nagel's argument is that death is bad to cause individual power by his consenting to directed against views from the beginning, and carefully establish the boundaries of his argument. For example, Nagel decides to leave aside the complex debate over whether we are "immortal" in some fashion - and define death as being the absence of any "conscious survival" .Similarly, he is equally careful to restrict the valuation of life to one's subjectivity instead of viewing it in an objective sense. This removes complications that may come from an "objective" viewing of the valuation of life from the perspective of others. Having thus carefully framed the boundaries of his argument, Nagel presents his key contention with regard to the "asymmetry" in…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, if all facts need be to dated, then we are back to square one and still need to determine when death is horrible. In that case, I stand with Kagan in stating that “death is bad for me when I’m dead”2. In my opinion, even when one ceases to exist, death can be awful on the premise that unawareness of what you are being deprived of doesn’t mean that you are not being deprived. Imagine there are two twin brothers, one brother, James, is immensely rich, among the 1% of wealthy people and the other brother, Jack, is James’ personal accountant. Jack steals about $5,000 from his brother every year for the past 10 years knowing James will not notice the missing money nor will he be suspicious. Indeed, James does not notice the subtle fluctuations in his money for the past ten years and is not in any way suspicious of Jack because he trusts Jack dearly. In the end, the James is being deprived of his money, whether or not he has no ample knowledge of it. This is to say that even in death, where we no longer exist, we are still being deprived of the very essence of life and living whether or not we are aware of…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Nagel Views on Life

    • 2383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When reading Chapter Two of “What does it All Mean?” I couldn’t help but notice how Nagel begins this section off by saying “If you think about it, the inside of your mind is the only thing you can be sure of.” Although some may chose to disagree with Thomas Nagel, I personally do agree with his view on life and the fact that it may not be real. In my opinion, when Nagel suggests that the inside of our mind is the only thing we can be sure of, I believe this is as true as it can be, why you may ask? Well simply because our mind is a very powerful tool in our body that makes everything possible. Our minds do everything for us from just everyday regular thinking and movement to giving us the power to imagine things that sometimes aren’t possible.…

    • 2383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death is inevitable. No matter how much an individual clings to life hoping and wishing to escape death, death always follows. Yet, in the presence of those who cling to life, there are individuals who accept that death is a part of life. Those individuals realize that from the moment of birth death is inevitable. In light of these two polar responses to death I find it important to try to understand the concept of “good death.” For the purpose of this short essay I will not dive into whether death is good. For now I will only explore the fluidity of “good death” by highlighting specific attitudes that have endured over the past 150 years and offer personal suggests for why I think these attitudes have persisted.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Nagel- Death

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thomas Nagel's Death explores the debate concerning the nature of death itself: is death a bad thing? Nagel explores this question by formulating 2 distinct hypotheses. The first of these is the postion that death deprives us of life, which is the only thing (or state) we have, which would make death a certain evil. The other position holds that death is merely the cessation of all awareness and, consequently, existence. Nagel discusses the conditions of position one, saying that life may not be the accumulation of good or bad experiences, hence life has a value that is not simply measured in existence of the organic body. This means that life itself, or the act of having life is inherently valuable and good, but is not solely based on mere existence. Nagel here uses the example of surviving in a coma and missing what goes on during said coma; this experience would not be desireable in this point. Another point in the first position is that good in life can be increased over time. The second position, being that death is simply the state of non-existence and thusly not evil in itself, has three points. The first is that death's evil is not something that has quantity, and thusly does not increase as one is dead, as good does during life. The second point holds that a temporary absence of awareness in life (such as a coma) would not be a great loss by itself. The third point is especially intriguing; it posits that we do not generally bemoan the period of time before we were born as being a misfortune, as we do the period after we cease living. Holding this belief would be a contradiction, and would not make logical sense.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    in Hecht 236) Hecht connects this idea to the idea of happiness because this way of thinking will help you to understanding death in a way that won’t distress you and if you remember that death is something that must happen to everyone, one can create a transformation within oneself and have a happier life. The effects that remembering death has on my idea of happiness is I know that we all must die, we all must enjoy life to the fullest while we are alive, and we must create a better future for our kids, but no one ever expects that their child will die before them. Trying to put your life back together after the loss of a child is unbearable. The pain and the grief is enough to succumb your…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear Of Death Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus also believed that death was not to be feared. The two writers list four reasons. People do not know what it's like to be dead. Nobody knows the feeling of death; therefore there is no need to fear of death. And we cannot say death is bad. In addition, the writer talks about the relationship between mortal and immortal. It will be boring if a person is mortal and never die. This is called the deprivation of death. If people do not want to live immortal, it is not necessary to fear of death. The third reason is people are worried about dying in a young age. Another possible answer is people are fear of dying in the near future. However, now science and technology are developed. Almost everyone lives healthy nowadays. If a person is health, then he or she does not need to be fear of death. Kagan and Epicurus, explore the thought-provoking part of death. Life after death could be a myth meaning the only important part of human life is when someone is alive. It is then clear of his existence. Could gauge him on his identity and see the effect of his living. As everyone waits for his death, as everyone also experiences the death of other people they become aware of the importance of existence. One’s existence is same as one’s death. The version of understanding both beliefs and values of a person, range from the mentality pursued within the articulation of the same…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Life and Death Overtakes

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Death is a dreaded word. It is a word that many people would not want to talk about. Death is considered a morbid word and many would not find this as an engaging topic. According to Patricelli (2007), “[d]eath remains a great mystery, one of the central issues with which religion and philosophy and science have wrestled since the beginning of human history. Even though dying is a natural part of existence, American culture is unique in the extent to which death is viewed as a taboo topic. Rather than having open discussions, we tend to view death as a feared enemy that can and should be defeated by modern medicine and machines”. There are also people that have negative connotations about death, rendering life even meaningless because of it. Death appears to render life meaningless for many people because they feel that there is no point in developing character or increasing knowledge if our progress is ultimately going to be thwarted by death (Augustine, 2000). But the author contends that there is a point in developing character and increasing knowledge before death overtakes us: to provide peace of mind and intellectual satisfaction to our lives and to the lives of those we care about for their own sake because pursuing these goals enriches our lives. From the fact that death is inevitable it does not follow that nothing we do matters now. On the contrary, our lives matter a great deal to us. If they did not, we would not find the idea of our own death so distressing--it wouldn't matter that our lives will come to an end. The fact that we're all eventually going to die has no relevance to whether our activities are worthwhile in the here and now: For an ill patient in a hospital a doctor's efforts to alleviate pain certainly does matter despite the fact that 'in the end' both the doctor and the patient will be dead (Augustine).…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Response To Nagel Death

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will address the first, and in my opinion, the strongest objection against Nagel’s argument. The objection is that it can be doubted that anything can be evil unless it causes displeasure to a person. In other words, how can the deprivation of life be evil if there is no one there to mind the deprivation? (Banach 2016) This type of objection can also be expressed in the general form by the remark ‘what you don’t know can’t hurt you’ (Nagel, 2008, p.771). To represent this objection, Nagel presents an example of a man who is betrayed, ridiculed and despised by people who seemingly like him. Yet none of this can be counted as a misfortune to him as long as he does not aware of it. Someone arguing for this objection holds the view that goods and evils must be temporally assignable states of a person. In the case mentioned above, betrayal, deception and ridicule are only bad for the man when he learns of them, but until he does, he does not suffer. Applying this argument to death, one can only suffer the implications of death after one ceases to exist. However, after one ceases to exist, there is no subject that the misfortune can be assigned to, and therefore death does not deprive us of any…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays