Twelve Angry Men Justice System
Twelve Angry Men illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision
Discussion
From the introduction after the headline, we are informed that twelve angry men come from different hierarchy, some of them are wealthy, high-education people, and some of them are poor, refugee people. they also have different disposition, juror No.3 is a mean and extremely opinionated person, and No.2 is a hesitate person; most of them are quite different. they are the behalf of social, that’s one of the element causes their conflict. Whatever the result, it is neither good nor bad for them. What supports their commitment to fulfilling their obligations? It is democracy, justice and ownership, and
that’s the biggest danger of justice system:if people lack of these spirit, what will happened?maybe the boy will be treat guilty.In the script, the basic principles and moral values of the American jury system are brilliantly deducted, and we can learn a lot about how the jury in the United States works and ultimately decides. A boy's life and death decisions in the from all walks of life, members of the jury, and the members in a stuffy little room began an intense thought, twelve jurors voting for the first time to produce 11 vote guilty to 1 innocent as a result, after a fierce discussion constantly "reasonable doubt" is put forward, finally passed the thought by 12 votes the defendant not guilty. According to the principle of the jury system, a suspect can be declared innocent by reasonable doubt. In the course of the jury's deliberations, the evidence supports its own vote, and the evidence is provided by professionals such as the police and lawyers. In the discussion of the jury, the guilty court should logically prove the defendant's behavior, while the one who supported the innocence questioned the existence of the prosecution's evidence. This is the system's respect for everyone's rest to life. So, to a large extent, it reduces the likelihood of a miscarriage.
This is the basic principle of a law -- presumption of innocence, plot and the promotion of a modern rule of law -- no crime. Hypochondria has never been the essence of the presumption of innocence. In the course of the court trial, the prosecutor has the duty to prove the defendant's guilt, and the defendant shall not be obliged to prove his guilt or innocence. The public prosecutor can't really sufficient evidence that the defendant crimes, the court after trial and supplementary investigation also cannot find out the fact that the defendant guilty, then can decide the defendant not guilty. This script represent the basic of the American justice system: it would rather not misjudge the misplaced. All in all, as long as people still get have democracy, justice and ownership, also critical thinking.There will be no such big danger in justice system.
Name:billy
Date:11.26 grade/class:s1c3 Assignment:
Discussion
From the introduction after the headline, we are informed that twelve angry men come from different hierarchy, some of them are wealthy, high-education people, and some of them are poor, refugee people. they also have different disposition, juror No.3 is a mean and extremely opinionated person, and No.2 is a hesitate person; most of them are quite different. they are the behalf of social, that’s one of the element causes their conflict. Whatever the result, it is neither good nor bad for them. What supports their commitment to fulfilling their obligations? It is democracy, justice and ownership, and
that’s the biggest danger of justice system:if people lack of these spirit, what will happened?maybe the boy will be treat guilty.In the script, the basic principles and moral values of the American jury system are brilliantly deducted, and we can learn a lot about how the jury in the United States works and ultimately decides. A boy's life and death decisions in the from all walks of life, members of the jury, and the members in a stuffy little room began an intense thought, twelve jurors voting for the first time to produce 11 vote guilty to 1 innocent as a result, after a fierce discussion constantly "reasonable doubt" is put forward, finally passed the thought by 12 votes the defendant not guilty. According to the principle of the jury system, a suspect can be declared innocent by reasonable doubt. In the course of the jury's deliberations, the evidence supports its own vote, and the evidence is provided by professionals such as the police and lawyers. In the discussion of the jury, the guilty court should logically prove the defendant's behavior, while the one who supported the innocence questioned the existence of the prosecution's evidence. This is the system's respect for everyone's rest to life. So, to a large extent, it reduces the likelihood of a miscarriage.
This is the basic principle of a law -- presumption of innocence, plot and the promotion of a modern rule of law -- no crime. Hypochondria has never been the essence of the presumption of innocence. In the course of the court trial, the prosecutor has the duty to prove the defendant's guilt, and the defendant shall not be obliged to prove his guilt or innocence. The public prosecutor can't really sufficient evidence that the defendant crimes, the court after trial and supplementary investigation also cannot find out the fact that the defendant guilty, then can decide the defendant not guilty. This script represent the basic of the American justice system: it would rather not misjudge the misplaced. All in all, as long as people still get have democracy, justice and ownership, also critical thinking.There will be no such big danger in justice system.
Name:billy
Date:11.26 grade/class:s1c3 Assignment: