Preview

[Uk Model Essay from Exam Board- Level 4] Do You Agree with the View That in the Years 1515-25 Henry Viii Wholly Surrendered Power in Government to Cardinal Wolsey?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
[Uk Model Essay from Exam Board- Level 4] Do You Agree with the View That in the Years 1515-25 Henry Viii Wholly Surrendered Power in Government to Cardinal Wolsey?
(40 MARK)

Whereas sources 4 and 6 suggest that Henry had given all power to Wolsey, source 5 contradicts this argument, describing how the king had overall power.

Source 4, an extract from Scarisbrick ‘Henry VIII,’ gives the impression that Henry gave all power to Wolsey, whilst he “hunted and jousted.” Cavendish then states how the king had “surrendered the cares of the state into the Cardinal’s hands.” This gives the impression that Wolsey had the powers of the king and was in charge of running the country efficiently. This is supported by source 6, where Henry asks Wolsey to watch some of the key nobility as well as “any others of whom you are superior.” This is clearly Henry giving Wolsey freedom to act as he wishes, thus suggesting power being given to Wolsey. Additional evidence of Wolsey’s power, especially over the nobility, can be seen in his work in the Star Chamber where he often imprisoned nobles. In one instance, Wolsey ordered Sir Paulet Angus [named needs to be verified] to follow him for five years in return for the humiliation suffered by Wolsey earlier on in his career. This presents the Cardinal as a powerful figure i8n the government, who could act freely from the king.

However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.

Source

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sources L and N agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25 although as source L is a painting it has a motive and probably a bias one whilst source M disagrees with the statement by highlighting ‘troubles associated from the Amicable Grant’.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Henry didn’t always get his way. Early on in his reign he made an agreement with Maximilian of Burgundy to aid him in his campaign against the French and the Flemish so long as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘How far was Henrys foreign policy merely defensive in the years between 1487 and 1509?’ (24 marks)…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry had no permanent army or police force and any rebellion was a threat. Henry was always mindful of the turbulence of the War of The Roses and the efforts of Henry VII to secure the dynasty. In his own mind, for the safety and the security of the realm he had to be completely ruthless which is what Henry did in the Pilgrimage of Grace. Henry’s policies for this rebellion were to play for time by promising anything, hoping the rebels would disperse when they thought they had achieved their…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His claim to the throne was more sensible than Simnel’s – he impersonated Richard, Duke of York and gained a large amount of support from foreign powers – France, Scotland, Ireland and Burgundy...this was only because he constantly had to flee from country to country when supported dropped as a result of Henrys treaty's. As such, Warbeck dominated Henry’s foreign policy for nearly 10 years, and in the end cost him over £13,000, which, as a new king, was financially crippling. These factors suggest Warbeck was a threat, which he potentially may have been, particularly if he had timed his invasion right to coincide with the Cornish…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It might be inferred that Henry was less than impressive as he was clearly insecure. Source two shows Henry seeking to compare favourability with his rival king Francis I of France. He persistently asks the Venetian ambassador whether he is more physically impressive than Francis e.g. Henry asks ‘what sort of legs has he got?’ Such insecurity might encourage challenges as Henry could be seen as unconfident about his own authority. This argument could gain weight from the fact that the ambassador would be seeking to provide accurate information to the government of Venice. It could however be seen as the only one incident by a king who had only been on the throne for six years. Also it is not sustained in the other two sources.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source A also states, in agreement to the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, that “Wolsey had a good reason to think that they had been very successful” as “Henry knew that he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric kingship” which were “increased by events such as those at the field of cloth in 1520” the…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Catholic Church was very powerful in England. Henry hated the fact that his country should allow someone else to have so much power of them. After all, Henry was very lustful for power, and was used to getting what he wants when he wants!…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    21st January 2015

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During his fourteen years of chancellorship Wolsey exercised considerable influence over Henry VIII's domestic policy during the years 1515 to 1529, involving himself in economic, legal and church affairs. Wolsey was either loved or hated for his wealth, position and manner particularly by the nobility. Some of his domestic policies were relatively successful with some failures, but some such as Finances had an almost equal amount of failures and successes. However, many historians argue that his policies were limited due to Henry’s ambitions in Europe. One aspect that Wolsey did have great impact was justice, with him introducing many new ideas. Although, some of his policies were unsuccessful such as the Enclosures, the policy that was the most unsuccessful and almost a complete failure was the amicable grant. This was a factor in Henry’s lack of trust in Wolsey during the latter part of his position as Lord Chancellor.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important was his opposition at court in causing Wolsey’s fall from power in 1529? (24 marks)…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes of Wolsey's Fakk

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is possible to argue that the main cause of Wolsey’s fall was opposition from ‘an aristocratic party’. The line that reads ‘There can be no doubt that for long an aristocratic party, led by the dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk, had been hoping to… dispossess him’ clearly supports the above statement. Both Norfolk and Suffolk come from nobility, and at that time it was the nobles who had a lot of influence. However, following Wolsey’s rise to authority, he did not hesitate to use his power against the nobles. This resulted in him having many enemies along the way, with the majority being those from noble backgrounds. On the other hand, it is possible to argue that Wolsey’s failure to secure the annulment of Henry’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon also contributed to his fall. Source 6 consists of a letter written by Anne Boleyn to Wolsey that explains how he couldn’t live up to his ‘fine promises about divorce’, and she ends it by expressing how it brought her ‘much sorrow’. This is a significant factor as it was this that led Henry to the realization that Wolsey cannot actually give him everything he wanted, and made him appear inefficient. Furthermore his inability to annul the marriage angered Anne Boleyn, resulting in her disliking Wolsey even more than she did before. This was highly unbeneficial for Wolsey as at the time she had a lot of power over Henry’s decisions.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays