Preview

henry and wolsey's foreign policy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
henry and wolsey's foreign policy
Do you agree with the suggestion in source C that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30? Explain your answer using sources A, B and C and your own knowledge (40 marks)
Collectively all three sources (A,B and C)explicitly disagree with the suggestion that in the years 1515-30 Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign. However both sources A and C do have evidence in which shows significant agreement with this suggestion.
Source C (by David Grossell) is undoubtedly the most obvious of the three sources for showing agreement with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, however source C also shows a disagreement with this suggestion as it states that “English diplomacy.... Failed to bring great gains to the county” Grossell is clearly talking about the amicable grant and its failure, as the amicable grant consequently lead to England forming an alliance with France whilst leaving the alliance they had with Spain. As a result of this England in 1529 were sidelined from any European affairs going on at that time period which most definitely would have had negative implications for England.
Source C’s disagreement with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30 is also backed up with source A as source A says “Although there were some obvious large scale failures, especially between 1515-25 and 1529” source A also is partly talking about the failure of the amicable grant which resulted in England being sidelined from European affairs.
Source A also states, in agreement to the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, that “Wolsey had a good reason to think that they had been very successful” as “Henry knew that he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric kingship” which were “increased by events such as those at the field of cloth in 1520” the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources L and N agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25 although as source L is a painting it has a motive and probably a bias one whilst source M disagrees with the statement by highlighting ‘troubles associated from the Amicable Grant’.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Henry didn’t always get his way. Early on in his reign he made an agreement with Maximilian of Burgundy to aid him in his campaign against the French and the Flemish so long as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English Foreign Policy from 1515 to 1528 can often be described as incoherent; this is because the aims of foreign policy from 1515 to 1529 kept altering due to the change in balance of power in Europe. This meant that for England to keep acting as the centre for European affair the foreign policy would have to keep changing. A result of this was that the foreign policy seemed ineffective due to lack of structure, the high costs, and few territorial acquisitions was the traditional opinion on the foreign policy that it was a failure. However with all of these mentioned factors the foreign policy could also have been seen as very effective. This was due to its ability to adapt to situations that arose in the period 1515 to 1529. If you break down this time period into smaller sections you can look at them individually and see where the foreign policy was effective on a smaller scale. When looking at this way it is easier to get a bigger picture as to how effective the foreign policy actually was.…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Directions: The following question requires you to construct a coherent essay that integrates your interpretation of Documents A-I and your knowledge of the period referred to in the question. Some of the documents have been edited, and wording and punctuation have been modernized.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The development of the English parliament evolved and increased in importance during the 14th century. In the English Parliament, Spanish and German deliberative practices were implemented into the representative assemblies. The English Parliament was much needed for Edward III’s constant need for money to pay for the war. What were the two greatest problems for the French monarchy in the 14th century?…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush Chapter 5 Outline

    • 6317 Words
    • 26 Pages

    a. King George’s war failed to establish either England or France as the dominate power…

    • 6317 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was unquestionably the main source of all authority over English government between 1515 and 1529 because of how it was he who actually put forward many different policies and reforms. Wolsey had at this point already impressed Henry VIII with the way he organised the successful expeditions and invasions of France and Scotland in 1513. He had also been promoted to the Archbishop of York and Tournai, and arranged the marriage of King Louis XII Mary Tudor in Étaples. This gave Wolsey a lot of grounding and credentials pre-1515, already making him a fairly influential figure. However, between 1515 and 1529, he definitely was the main source of all authority; whist acknowledging the fact that he was a minister, and not a monarch (i.e. he stuck to the legal mechanisms that confined him, and instead manipulated them), he was able to centralise power at Westminster towards himself. He established the Tudor subsidy. Wolsey was able to act as a bridge between Henry and the papacy, through him being a legate a latere, as well as through how he defended the Church’s rights. In the later years, he actually asked Henry to consult the pope about sanctuary. Despite the fact that he refused, him being able to ‘challenge’ the King in such a manner…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important was his opposition at court in causing Wolsey’s fall from power in 1529? (24 marks)…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anne Boleyn’s influence other Henry was certainly significant; she manipulated and seduced him, as well as succeeding in introducing him to the idea of Erastian kingship and Protestantism. Undoubtedly, her influence was one of the catalysts for the Reformation. Source 4 not only suggests the cause of enmity between Wolsey and Anne, but hints at the power Anne had over the King, thus indicating she might have been responsible for his downfall. It is a letter from Anne herself, accusing Wolsey of ‘betray[ing]’ her, and only ‘pretend[ing] to support [her] interest’ ‘to discover the secrets of [her] heart’, after the court led by Campeggio referred its decision the Curia at Rome. Moreover, through writing ‘the King still less’ she is speaking on Henry’s behalf, thus showing her influence over him, and the fact she had a greater influence over him than Wolsey. Source 5 supports this view point; the very fact Wolsey appeals to Anne to regain good grace indicates the power even he believed she had over the King. Moreover, it shows how Anne refused to use that power and, again suggesting enmity between them. The fact that no one spoke on Wolsey’s behalf ‘for fear of Madame Anne’s displeasure’ indicates Anne’s influence and high status at Court.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wolsey and henry VIII

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is also reinstated in Source 5, where it says that Henry VIII passed over some control over to Wolsey but did not wholly surrender his power in government, as ‘the ultimate source of all power was the king’. It also states that Wolsey ‘held a dominant position’ which we know as he was appointed Lord Chancellor by Henry and also became ‘legate a latere’ in 1518. Wolsey was left to arrange the Field of Cloth of Gold in 1520, achieving international glory for Henry showing that he must have had significant power to be trusted by the King in order to organise such an event.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey Essay

    • 931 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Source ‘T’, written by Polydore Vergil: a known enemy of Wolsey, criticizes Wolsey’s ‘ambition’ and ‘arrogance’ which in pair would assume a very unlikeable character, also in the Tudor era the public preferred sustainability rather than growth which supports Source ‘V’ in which Dawson explains that the sixteenth century ‘sought stability’ rather than ‘change’. Vergil also expresses that Wolsey held ‘the hatred of the whole country’ due to his ‘hostility’ towards the majority possibly in relation to his failed attempt at the Amicable Grant which forced many to rebel against him: a huge failure on his part, which did in…

    • 931 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different opinions regarding whether Wolsey was seen more as a partner to Henry than a servant. Whilst source 7 agrees with this, suggesting that not only did Wolsey have equal power to that of Henry, but he also had the wealth and mannerism of a king too. Source 8 however contradicts this, and suggests that Wolsey was purely a servant to the king. As everything Wolsey did went through Henry first, it is seen here that Wolsey had no power at all, a relied heavily on pleasing the king in order to keep his statutory role as cardinal. This suggests that Wolsey could have been in fact fearful of Henry, showing an entirely more servant relationship and completely contradicting that of source 7. It is important when analysing the sources, establishing the differences between how other people perceived the relationship between Wolsey and the king, and how the king actually perceived it.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays