Preview

Wolsey Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
931 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wolsey Essay
Using Sources T, U and V and your own knowledge.
Do you accept the view in Source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were disappointing?

Wolsey’s domestic policies covered a wide range of aspects including his focus on justice, especially through the Star Courts which allowed anyone to stand before him regardless of wealth or status whilst he was also able to practice civil law rather than common law. However Wolsey did use the courts to his advantage on occasion, causing some of the nobility to share resentment towards Wolsey. There is also a lot of focus on his failed attempt at the reversal of the sealing off of enclosed land as he tried to force land owners to allow poorer people to farm on unused land again, this failure showed he could not always exert power on his superiors which bred hatred towards him from the nobility. Wolsey again brewed anger within the nobility as he created a larger tax burden on the richer in conjunction with a lower burden on the poorer. He also managed to cause widespread anger and hatred with the Amicable Grant of 1525, a non parliamentary tax after the Battle of Pavia, by which the public responded with a rebellion and refusal to pay the tax. Whilst Wolsey’s domestic policy had promising ideas, he never managed to please everyone. Also, his role as the papal legate improved England’s connection with the pope.

Source ‘T’, written by Polydore Vergil: a known enemy of Wolsey, criticizes Wolsey’s ‘ambition’ and ‘arrogance’ which in pair would assume a very unlikeable character, also in the Tudor era the public preferred sustainability rather than growth which supports Source ‘V’ in which Dawson explains that the sixteenth century ‘sought stability’ rather than ‘change’. Vergil also expresses that Wolsey held ‘the hatred of the whole country’ due to his ‘hostility’ towards the majority possibly in relation to his failed attempt at the Amicable Grant which forced many to rebel against him: a huge failure on his part, which did in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Source 4, an extract from Scarisbrick ‘Henry VIII,’ gives the impression that Henry gave all power to Wolsey, whilst he “hunted and jousted.” Cavendish then states how the king had “surrendered the cares of the state into the Cardinal’s hands.” This gives the impression that Wolsey had the powers of the king and was in charge of running the country efficiently. This is supported by source 6, where Henry asks Wolsey to watch some of the key nobility as well as “any others of whom you are superior.” This is clearly Henry giving Wolsey freedom to act as he wishes, thus suggesting power being given to Wolsey. Additional evidence of Wolsey’s power, especially over the nobility, can be seen in his work in the Star Chamber where he often imprisoned nobles. In one instance, Wolsey ordered Sir Paulet Angus [named needs to be verified] to follow him for five years in return for the humiliation suffered by Wolsey earlier on in his career. This presents the Cardinal as a powerful figure i8n the government, who could act freely from the king.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (b) Study sources 1, 2 and 3 and use your knowledge. How far would you agree with the view that Henry VIII’s and Wolsey’s foreign policy was an expensive failure?…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In many respects Wolsey’s foreign policies were very effective in confirming Henry VIII’s royal authority and demonstrating his strengths, however in other ways they did not show this quite as well instead leaving him isolated. Many events need to be taken into consideration when deciding on the effectiveness of Wolsey’s foreign policies, these are the Anglo-Spanish treaty, the treaty of London, the field of cloth and gold, the election for Holy Roman Emperor after the death of Maximillian, his treaties during the second French war and finally his attempts at gaining an annulment for Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII was also very annoyed at Wolsey his adviser at the time for not being able to get him a divorce so he fired him and had him beheaded but he died on the way to execution.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, there were some aspects of Wolsey’s domestic policies which were particularly disappointing. This is established through the word in source V, “Wolsey sees to carry an air of disappointment”. For example there was clear resentment from the nobility from his policies of Enclosure and Engrossing in 1517 which subsequently left Wolsey having to abandon these domestic policies by 1523 because of the backlash he received. This “air of disappointment’ was also exemplified by Wolsey’s failed process to gain money for Henrys war effort: the Amicable Grant 1525 which failed as it was such a large tax which was bound to stir up considerable opposition, and so it proved. Violence flared in around England, causing Henry to halt the tax. As well as his arrogance and hatred to many nobility in the country which led to him being an unpopular character amongst them. Source T re-alliterates the unpopularity of Wolsey and his policies by stating he was “detested by everyone”, this was common between especially the nobles, however after executing Buckingham and Sheffield in 1521, nobles who threatened Wolsey it is clear that he would do anything to stride in Henry’s good favour. We can also in infer from this source that Wolsey’s steps were for his own benefit and wealth, the Eltham ordinances 1526 is a key example of how he…

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    21st January 2015

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During his fourteen years of chancellorship Wolsey exercised considerable influence over Henry VIII's domestic policy during the years 1515 to 1529, involving himself in economic, legal and church affairs. Wolsey was either loved or hated for his wealth, position and manner particularly by the nobility. Some of his domestic policies were relatively successful with some failures, but some such as Finances had an almost equal amount of failures and successes. However, many historians argue that his policies were limited due to Henry’s ambitions in Europe. One aspect that Wolsey did have great impact was justice, with him introducing many new ideas. Although, some of his policies were unsuccessful such as the Enclosures, the policy that was the most unsuccessful and almost a complete failure was the amicable grant. This was a factor in Henry’s lack of trust in Wolsey during the latter part of his position as Lord Chancellor.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite this being the main reason, it is true that Wolsey’s unpopularity was a factor that contributed as well, his many enemies at court provided reasons for Henry to remove him but Henry didn’t get rid of his straight away because Wolsey was able to do what he asked. However, when he failed, Henry took into consideration these enemies (especially the Duke of Norfolk because of his family ties with Anne Boleyn.) and his failures with gaining the nobilities favour. Therefore Wolsey’s ultimate downfall was the failure of not securing an annulment, but his unpopularity and minor failures such as the subsidies were contributing factors to the most important reasons of why he eventually fell from…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was unquestionably the main source of all authority over English government between 1515 and 1529 because of how it was he who actually put forward many different policies and reforms. Wolsey had at this point already impressed Henry VIII with the way he organised the successful expeditions and invasions of France and Scotland in 1513. He had also been promoted to the Archbishop of York and Tournai, and arranged the marriage of King Louis XII Mary Tudor in Étaples. This gave Wolsey a lot of grounding and credentials pre-1515, already making him a fairly influential figure. However, between 1515 and 1529, he definitely was the main source of all authority; whist acknowledging the fact that he was a minister, and not a monarch (i.e. he stuck to the legal mechanisms that confined him, and instead manipulated them), he was able to centralise power at Westminster towards himself. He established the Tudor subsidy. Wolsey was able to act as a bridge between Henry and the papacy, through him being a legate a latere, as well as through how he defended the Church’s rights. In the later years, he actually asked Henry to consult the pope about sanctuary. Despite the fact that he refused, him being able to ‘challenge’ the King in such a manner…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important was his opposition at court in causing Wolsey’s fall from power in 1529? (24 marks)…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anne Boleyn’s influence other Henry was certainly significant; she manipulated and seduced him, as well as succeeding in introducing him to the idea of Erastian kingship and Protestantism. Undoubtedly, her influence was one of the catalysts for the Reformation. Source 4 not only suggests the cause of enmity between Wolsey and Anne, but hints at the power Anne had over the King, thus indicating she might have been responsible for his downfall. It is a letter from Anne herself, accusing Wolsey of ‘betray[ing]’ her, and only ‘pretend[ing] to support [her] interest’ ‘to discover the secrets of [her] heart’, after the court led by Campeggio referred its decision the Curia at Rome. Moreover, through writing ‘the King still less’ she is speaking on Henry’s behalf, thus showing her influence over him, and the fact she had a greater influence over him than Wolsey. Source 5 supports this view point; the very fact Wolsey appeals to Anne to regain good grace indicates the power even he believed she had over the King. Moreover, it shows how Anne refused to use that power and, again suggesting enmity between them. The fact that no one spoke on Wolsey’s behalf ‘for fear of Madame Anne’s displeasure’ indicates Anne’s influence and high status at Court.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    english essay

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author Tina Fanning in the newspaper article “cars no longer sustainable”, which was written in July 2007, contents the effect of car usage on global warming and the effect on the future of our children that proves the high level of harmfulness that global warming causes. The audience in this article is aiming at car users and state governors.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    english essay

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pointed and scathing in its criticism of Australian attitudes to migrants; they will never fit in until they give up everything…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays