Preview

United States Antitrust Law In The Alcoa Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
United States Antitrust Law In The Alcoa Case
additionally, the decision in Alcoa case had a vast international response, because other countries had made efforts to block such “long hand” of United States antitrust law and enacted various national law provisions such as The Protection of Trading Interest law 1980 enacted in Unikted kingdom, the objective of which was to control the extent of application of United States antitrust law in their jurisdictions. However, it can be argued that such measures taken by other countries now can be considered as obsolete, because recently countries are following the cooperation approach rather than blocking measures. European aluminium producers to monopolize the aluminium market. However, Alcoa argued that most of the cartel's activities took

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History: Federal Trade Commission instituted a deceptive advertising proceeding against Kraft Inc. Kraft was instructed to terminate certain ads due to false advertising.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, a corporation can be charged and convicted of any number of crimes. If the employees or officers within a corporation violate the law on behalf of the corporation and within the scope of their employment, the corporate entity would be open to criminal charges. Corporations can be convicted of criminal wrongdoing in the same manner individuals are charged and convicted. In addition, individuals within the corporation can be charged as well. Commonly, when a corporation is charged, many of the top officers will be charged along with the corporation as an entity.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kimberly Ellerth worked in Burlington’s Chicago office from March 1993 through May 1994, first as a merchandising assistant and later as a sales representative. Theodore Slowik was a New York based Vice-President of sales and marketing, supervising Ellerth’s immediate supervisors. Slowik made primarily the decision as to Ellerth’s hire and subsequent promotion. Ellerth spoke with Slowik when he traveled to her Chicago office and when she traveled to business related conferences in New York and elsewhere. Ellerth was required to get Slowik’s approval of special sales to her customers. Soon after Ellerth began working for Burlington, Slowik began to subject Ellerth to harassing acts and comments, coupled with threats that her refusal to submit would result in retaliation. For example, in the summer of 1993, Slowik made a series of comments about Ellerth’s legs and breasts. Ellerth never gave Slowik’s any indication that she was interested in him. Nonetheless, he continued to subject her to unwanted touching of her body. Ellerth resigned soon after Slowik refused to authorize a special project for one of Ellerth’s customers. Three weeks after resigning, Ellerth informed Slowik’s supervisors at Burlington that she had resigned due to Slowik’s harassment. She testified that she did not complain about Slowik’s harassment while still employed by Burlington because she feared for losing her job.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sixty years after the verdict on Donaghue’ case, Australia passed a statutory code that deals with defective goods. The only completed action brought under Part VA was the…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A contract is a special kind of voluntary agreement, either written or oral, that involves legally binding obligations between two or more parties (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 126, para. 1). A contract protects each party with the legal means of enforcing a right or redressing a wrong if another party does not perform his or her obligations following to the terms of the contract.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monopoly occurs when a company has such a large portion of the product market that it can set its own price despite the market equilibrium. Monopolies date back to Standard Oil Co. Inc. in 1870. Standard Oil Co. Inc. controlled also the entire oil market in its time and made huge profits by doing so. The Sherman Antitrust Act was put in place to combat monopolies and their power in the marketplace.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Case 3-3

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1950 case of P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, P. Lorillard Co., the makers of Old Gold cigarettes, were ordered to “cease and desist from making certain representations found to be false in the advertising of its tobacco products (Warner, et al., 2012, p. 950) From a practical perspective in the 1950’s caveat emptor, or “let the buyer beware” is not a fair or reasonable expectation. While the careful consumer could have looked at the article, the culture of the time was not anti-smoking as it is today. The careful consumer at the time was not savvy to the wealth of scientific data regarding smoking and health. The actual ad, see Figure 1: 1942 WW2 Era Old Gold Santa Cigarette Ad, states that the impartial tests were not done to boost sales or claim superiority of brand. The ad misleads the consumer to believe that it was impartially discovered that Old Gold had the stated attributes.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In law, standing is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. When it comes to the right of standing in cases related to patented technology, it becomes more complicated than just being able to prove that the infringement harms the party, he should also have all the rights of the patented technology to be eligible to sue.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ____ U.S. courts have no jurisdiction over foreign businesses with operations in the United States.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1991 about 10,000 Exxon dealers sued Exxon Corporation in federal court, alleging that the corporation had engaged in an extensive scheme to overcharge them for fuel. A jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, but the District Court judge certified the case for review on the question of supplemental jurisdiction. Some of the multiple plaintiffs in the case had claims that did not meet the minimum amount necessary to qualify for federal diversity jurisdiction (currently $75,000). In 1990 Congress had enacted 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, overturning Finley v. United States, which had narrowly interpreted federal courts' power to confer supplementary jurisdiction on related claims. The question for the District Court was whether Section 1367 also overturned Zahn v. International Paper Co., which ruled that each plaintiff had to separately meet the minimum amount-in-controversy requirement. The District Court accepted the plaintiffs' argument that Section 1367 gave federal courts power to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs with related claims, even if some plaintiffs' claims did not meet the required amount. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's ruling on supplemental jurisdiction. However, this ruling conflicted with the ruling of another Circuit, which had taken the opposite view of Section 1367's scope (see Ortega v. Star-Kist Foods, No. 04-79). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and consolidated the cases for argument.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressives had beliefs such as industrialization and urbanization had created troubling social and political problems. Progressives wanted to bring about reforms that would correct what they saw as problems and injustices. The Antitrust Laws were designed to prevent and punish anti-competitive practices. Progressives complained that the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was inadequate and ineffective in limiting the abuses of big businesses. The Progressives made states pass the antitrust laws to make cartels and monopolistic practices illegal and to regulate railroad rates.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egt1 Task 3

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are 4 major acts created that are known as the Antitrust Laws. In the 1870’s and 1880’s, the Sherman Act of 1890 was created. This act made monopolies and conspiracies that tried controlling trade a criminal offense. This act exists with 2 provisions, the 1st is that every contract, blending in the form of a trust or otherwise, or attempt to conspiracy, in limit of trade or market among several States, or with distant nations is acknowledged to be unlawful.”…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Gatsby

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everybody wants to have that American Dream. Whatever or whoever it is, it is a dream. A dream to some people can mean like a goal or fantasy wise. A dream in general is a series of thoughts, images, and sensations occurring in a person's mind during sleep. But an American Dream is the traditional social ideals of the United States, such as equality, democracy, and material prosperity.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays