Even though the war is
Even though the war is
Eisenhower, John S. D. So Far From God: The U. S. War with Mexico 1846 1848. New York: Random House, 1989, xxvi, 436.…
Chapter eight discusses the Mexican-American War. Zinn argues that while some people have represented the war as a popular cause, the truth was fairly different. He mentions that President James Polk pushed an expansionist agenda to excuse his conquest of México, and the press supported his actions by lying about the conflict and popular response to it. Zinn argues that soldiers and the public did not like the invasion of México at all. Thousands of soldiers died from disease and desertion. Zinn’s main argument is that the invasion of México was labeled as a defensive action to gain support from soldiers and the public, but it was still seen as a war by many, and the public did not gain anything significant. The public generally thought the war was useless.…
Mexico, due to the lack of centralized leader, lost the war. War ended in 1848 with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which the United States paid Mexico with $15 million to build a border between the Texas and Mexico and to gain the east land of Mexico. Mexicans were promised of US citizenship and they would be allowed to keep their own land. But the treaty was not fully implemented. Due to a huge loss of land, the possibility of underdevelopment would likely to happen in the future and with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexican citizen felt as if they were treated poorly.…
“We Take Nothing By Conquest, Thank God,” is a chapter in Howard Zinn's, History of the People. Zinn makes the point that the Mexican-American War was agitated by President Polk, and that the newspapers of the time falsely represented people's opinions of the war even though it was very unpopular among U.S citizens, and the army itself. In the night of his inauguration President Polk confided in his Secretary of the Navy that one of his main objectives was to acquire California. Then Polk incited the war by sending American soldiers into what was disputed territory that was controlled by the Mexicans. The American government had given Mexico no choice, but to fire the first shot and so the war was started. At the same time the Democratic Review became famous saying that it was “Our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions,” in order to inspire more people to join the volunteer army to fight in Mexico. At the same time the New York Journal of Commerce stated that, “The supreme Ruler of the universe seems to interpose, and aid the energy of man towards benefiting mankind. His interposition...seems to me to be identified with the success of our arms...That the redemption of 7,000,000 of souls from all the vices that infest the human race, is the ostensible object...appears manifest,” in order to justify the Mexican-American War in the eyes of their readers.…
For example, as the U.S. continued to move westward, Mexican Americans were one of the citizens that were forced to transition into what the U.S. saw as the correct way of life. Unlike the Indians, the Mexican Americans were citizens and were unable to be ran off their land. The Mexican Americans wanted to be a part of the new political structures of their new “homeland” but found themselves being ignored and without say. Instead of trying to prove a point and be heard, it only made their situation worse. Knowing what they were getting themselves into and tired of being at the bottom of the political chain, in 1859 a wealthy landowner from Brownsville named Juan Cortina decided to declare war, known as Cortina’s Rebellion. Mexicans tried to seek respect and with war comes the death of people; this would be the beginning of the Civil war, the first of many wars for the Mexican Americans which were fought for equality in the new land. So instead of the U.S. going off on the Mexicans and going to war, I feel they could have came to an agreement where both can live as one, but it was never enough for the U.S., it was either all or nothing.…
The Lincoln County War is one of the most prominent and profound pieces of New Mexico’s history, yet it is also one of the bloodiest encounters the region ever experienced. Passed down through stories and the set of countless old western movies, the War featured some of New Mexico’s most recognizable and historic characters and events. The most intriguing parts of the War include the cause of the dispute, the fighting which occurred during the War, and the lasting effects the War has on New Mexico.…
On December 26 1822, the Minister of Washington had announced to the public that“ They will be our sworn enemies, and foreseeing this we ought to treat them as such from the present day” (Rippy 2). As he had been referring to America’s relationship with Mexico, it is not surprising that the conflict between the Mexican- American borders has been constant since the early 1700. Due to the hatred between these countries, it has caused it people to become prejudice to their neighbors as they think less of one another and lack respect towards each other. As Gloria Anzaldua had shown this segregation in her children’s book Friends from the other side, She uses characterization and code switching to represent tension in and around Mexican-American borders in…
For years, the lives of Mexican Americans were living in harsh conditions due to being racial discriminated against by Anglo Americans. Mexicans have had their land taken away, received low wages, and targeted for petty crimes. At the start of World War II, Mexicans Americans were given an opportunity to join the armed forces for a chance to change their social and economic conditions at home. When Mexican came home from the war they developed an excellent military record, as well as their self-esteem and confidence. The government then started introduction education programs to effectively prepared Mexicans-Americans in the American life. Relations were improved with the Anglo population through the Spanish-Speaking People’s Division in the…
Gloria Anzaldua’s Borderlands explores the identity of a people caught between two cultures: the Anglo-American culture and that of the indigenous Aztecs of the Southwest United States, the mestizo. In the first chapter, The Homeland, Aztlan, she describes how since the conquering of Mexico by Cortez, Anglo-Americans have slowly seized their land. The mestizo population was forced further down Mexico through fear of lynchings and the poverty faced. Many had no alternative but to become sharecroppers and could not afford to pay back their debts. Until finally the Anglo-Americans gained complete political power and in 1848 created a fence around their “new found land” to keep the so called immigrants out. Anzaldua claims that if the mestizos were forced off their land then the Anglo-Americans unjustifiably acquired it. Today even as mestizos have come to adopt many of the values of American culture they are exploited as cheap labor and are still forced off their own land by deportation.…
In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…
Cited: Brinkley, Alan. "America And The Great War." American History: Connecting with the Past. 14th ed. Vol. 2. N.p.: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 603-07. Print.…
Anglo Texans greeted the end of the U.S-Mexican War in 1848 with the hope that federal troops would at last put an end to violent encounters with Indians and Mexicans along the state's western and southern borders and open the vast frontier to settlement. All too quickly the lure of nearly free and unbroken land attracted a multitude of pioneers. So rapidly, in fact, that it thrust some white settlers far beyond the protection of the eight new military installations established at war's end, running from Fort Worth in North Texas to Fort Duncan on the Rio Grande.…
Time periods of American history are analyzed closely to the extent that it is essential to understand the motives and basis for future events and to recognize social patterns. Among events that have affected the United States, immigrations, wars and political dispute are three of the chief categories that most directly affect the state of the nation as well as each other. The war class has been easily liked to both political and social changes in the domestic atmosphere and is therefore subject to analysis of the varying origins and causes. And no other war has affected the United States like the Civil War due to the sheer number of deaths and the complete reconstruction of the nation during the aftermath. Just as important as the war itself would be the transformations that took place among the people was a newfound lack of compromise concerning the admission of new territories and whether or not they would be free or slave. This failure to agree was chiefly the fear of public and congressional imbalance. This and dispute over the legitimacy and abuse of popular sovereignty would cause quarrels and accusations attributed to the constitutionality of documents passed and the course certain events took, mainly, the Missouri Compromise, the South Carolina Nullification Crisis, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Presidential election of 1860, the main contributors to the breakdown of compromise seen in this era.…
“In the eyes of the [Mexican] government, the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico…. As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border” (Jesus Velasco-Marquez 327). But even though some have seen America’s actions as selfish and mean, America did have enough reasons in expanding, growing and prospering. America was never a bully and their actions were significant in the becoming of the…
The southern borderlands at the heart of the current debate serve as a testament to the region’s troubled past.While the U.S. and Mexico have similar origins as constitutional republics that broke free from colonial forbearers, it was only the former that doggedly pursued expansionism under the guise of Manifest Destiny. As early as the 1820s, the enduring racial stereotype of Mexicans as an “idle, thriftless people” was used to justify the rapid influx of White Americans into the Mexican territory of California, with the eminent statesman Richard Henry Dana reported to have exclaimed that “in the hands of an enterprising people, what a country this might be!” After the Mexican-American War claimed around 40,000 lives in less than two years…