Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God

Good Essays
606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God
“We Take Nothing By Conquest, Thank God,” is a chapter in Howard Zinn's, History of the People. Zinn makes the point that the Mexican-American War was agitated by President Polk, and that the newspapers of the time falsely represented people's opinions of the war even though it was very unpopular among U.S citizens, and the army itself. In the night of his inauguration President Polk confided in his Secretary of the Navy that one of his main objectives was to acquire California. Then Polk incited the war by sending American soldiers into what was disputed territory that was controlled by the Mexicans. The American government had given Mexico no choice, but to fire the first shot and so the war was started. At the same time the Democratic Review became famous saying that it was “Our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions,” in order to inspire more people to join the volunteer army to fight in Mexico. At the same time the New York Journal of Commerce stated that, “The supreme Ruler of the universe seems to interpose, and aid the energy of man towards benefiting mankind. His interposition...seems to me to be identified with the success of our arms...That the redemption of 7,000,000 of souls from all the vices that infest the human race, is the ostensible object...appears manifest,” in order to justify the Mexican-American War in the eyes of their readers.
Zinn's inclusion of this chapter in order to describe the time period of the Mexican-American War was in order to show the true reality behind it. The fact that the United States gave Mexico no choice but to begin the war. At the same time Zinn uses this to show the negative feelings towards the war that spread throughout the United States. William Lloyd Garrison declared his wishes for the defeat of General Scott's army, in The Liberator, stating “We wish him and his troops no bodily harm, but the most utter defeat and disgrace.” At the same time Reverend Francis Wayland said that only wars of self-defense were just, and in case of unjust war, the individual was morally obliged to resist it and lend no money to the government to support it. Desertion rates in the army also grew rapidly due to the fact that the soldiers, “did not like the army, they did not like the war, and generally speaking they did not like Mexico or the Mexicans.” At the end the glory of the victory was more for the President and the generals, than the soldiers, the dead, or the wounded. In the end through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the Texas boundary was set at the Rio Grande, and New Mexico and California were ceded.
The Mexican-American War is an example of a compromise of the noble intentions of the American people by slavery, poverty, and war. Right from the beginning Mexico is pushed into an unnecessary war by President Polk, due to his desire for U.S expansion. Due to Polk's decision hundreds of lives were lost which were unnecessary and could have been avoided. The American Anti-Slavery Society stated that war was “waged solely for the detestable and horrible purpose of extending and perpetuating American slavery throughout the vast territory of Mexico.” After the end of the war though immense fortunes were made by speculators from the poor soldiers who were desperate for money and were forced into selling the 160 acres of land promised them for less than $50.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower, John S. D. So Far From God: The U. S. War with Mexico 1846 – 1848. New York: Random House, 1989, xxvi, 436.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American President, James K. Polk, wanted to resolve these and other issues peacefully, but he also wanted to acquire California for the Union. When the Mexican government rejected his emissary, John Slidell, the stage was set for war. The causus belli was the corssing of the Rio Grande by a body of Mexican troops. A skirmish broke out and several American soldiers were killed. America declared war and drove the Mexican force out of U.S. territory. A force under General Stephen Kearny took Arizona, New Mexico, and California, while General Zachary Taylor drove south into Mexico. While his campaign was a disappointment, General Winfield Scott was much more successful.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Yes, I believe Howard Zinn’s arguments, because during that time period, our soldiers didn’t really enjoy fighting, just stay in their homes and also I agree that the Mexican American war was fought for the purposes of expansion and Zinn perfectly described events that makes you see the…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While most Americans call the war the, “American-Mexican War”, the other side would call it, “The U.S. Invasion”. If it is God’s reasoning to expand the U.S. territory as far as possible, then is it also his reasoning to murder those upon their own land? It is not only unjustified to take the land from the Mexicans, however to become inhuman enough to kill those while doing so is unspeakable. There was no need for any more conflict at that time, so to start a war was not ideal for anyone. Would a war be more beneficial or cost efficient than a compromise or a buyout? The Mexicans had only simple ideas of allowing outsiders into their land to increase population. In the words of General Francisco Mejia, “The right of conquest has always been…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican American War DBQ

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One can argue that the Mexican-American was an unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression and territorial aggrandizement. It could also be argued that the war was not unprovoked nor was it territorial aggrandizement. Realistically the war provoked, justifiable, and not territorial aggrandizement. This notion is exemplified through the document provided.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil,” said President Polk (doc B). When troops arrived at the Rio Del Norte, Mexican troops attacked the Americans, killing and wounding sixteen soldiers. (Hook) This was the deciding factor of America going to war with Mexico. “When word arrived on May 9, 1846, that Mexicans soldiers had fired upon Americans on the “Texas side” of the Rio Grande, president Polk had a reason for going to war.” (BG essay) You see, if Mexico hadn’t engaged in violence first there would be no immediate reason for the U.S. to go to war with…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains how the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the addition of California served as an American “conquest” for Mexican land because the total land acquired “amounted to one-half of Mexico” (163). This shows how American ideas, like Manifest Destiny, justified expansionism and the annexation of land that previously belonged to Mexico. Thus, American expansion violated individual land rights and resulted in a major loss of property for Mexico. Takaki also elaborated upon the difficulty of validating land claims when measurements were “loosely marked” and courts required “accurate boundaries and proof of legitimate titles” (167). Mexicans often had difficulty providing such evidence and many resorted to biased lawyers, risky loans, or selling their land. Therefore, because this policy disproportionately affected Mexicans, it was an encroachment on their property…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was not that long ago the United States went to war with their neighboring country, Mexico. With James K. Polk being elected president of the United States in 1844, things were about to change for Mexico. A war was about to emerge that would make the United States a bigger and better country. Without the economic growth, Mexico lacked a strong Army to defeat the American Army and Navy to keep their land. Mexico would not give up their land without a fight. People believe that the United States had no right to start a war with Mexico and take a huge part of their land. With that being said, President Polk had other plans up his sleeve, a plan to take Mexican land from Texas to California.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican War Research Paper

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages

    destroy an enemy. But in this case, the United States aggressively invaded Mexico. Polk’s over…

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason the Mexican War was justified was the Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny is a belief that God wanted the U.S. to expand itself across the Pacific. The U.S. thought that Mexico couldn’t govern a nation and the U.S. can lay schools and colleges every time they take a step. To support this in Document A, it says “armed with the plough and rifle, and marking its trail with schools and colleges.” This evidence shows the US was justified in going to war because it was god’s plan to extend themselves to the Pacific.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American War, If one were to ask an American they will most likely passionately describe their country’s victory with unshameful pride. Whereas if one were to ask a Mexican, they would most likely swear and shake their heads at their country’s defeat. President James K.Polk of The United States wrote a message to the congress explaining how that since war exits with Mexico, regaining possession is with duty and patriotism with the decision of honor, rights,and dignity for the nation.(Document 2) These powerful and moving words were probably what motivated the troops to do what brought them victory. He did what presidents are supposed to do, uplift their nation and lead them in the right direction. The Mexican-American war lead to the annexation of Texas.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican War Dbq Essay

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1846 the United States went to war with Mexico. It was a brutal time. This country has gone to war with Mexico and no one was prepared for what was going to happen next. America was not justified in going to war with Mexico for these three reasons: provoking the war, territory was not decided, and Polk ordered troops to go to Mexico. Before the war, Texas declared its independence from Mexico. After James K. Polk was elected President, he sent an envoy to Mexico City to try and buy California, and then he sent troops to Texas. The Manifest Destiny is a belief that America would eventually become all 50 states like they are today.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Wicked War Analysis

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the other hand Americans hold on to a belief that was popular with one candidate. John O’ Sullivan focused on a concept, manifest destiny. The idea of this concept was that Americans had a God given right to take the land in the west, eventually the land between the Atlantic and Pacific ocean. In the election of 1844 James K. Polk used manifest destiny to resolve the issue that many had to make Texas a part of the United States. He would later annex Oregon a s a free state so the their would be no strange dynamic between free and slave states. Unfortunately, this solution had a…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mexican War Dbq Analysis

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mexico was interfering with the U.S’ belief in Manifest Destiny. The U.S believed they had a right to overspread the continent with their constantly increasing population. By preventing the expansion of the U.S, Mexico was limiting their greatness and challenging their power. Taking land will benefit both Mexico and the U.S (Doc A). The U.S would bring education, farming, industry, and democracy as they expanded across the country. This would bring a more civilized lifestyle under U.S laws, which would benefit Mexico in the eyes of the U.S. The United States was justified in going to war, because Mexico was preventing the expansion of the U.S, and therefore challenging the U.S’…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays