But this idea was not supported by the government at all in the Mexican-American War. The Mexican-American War was an American attack on Mexico, an independent nation. If the Monroe Doctrine actually changed the way United States approached western expansion, Americans never would’ve attacked Mexico. A cartoon of Mexico portrayed as an eagle decimated by the Mexican-American war shows American intentions during the war (Doc I). Feelings of pride and power pushed American efforts to expand westward, not a “responsibility” to push impeding European powers out of North America. Americans wanted to gain land and spread democracy, and because of this desire, they attacked another independent nation with no connections to Europe. The US government was interested in gaining land already claimed by an independent nations than preventing Europe from interfering with American affairs. The American foreign policy was not defined by the Monroe Doctrine and the government blatantly ignored the ideas being promoted in the…
Chapter eight discusses the Mexican-American War. Zinn argues that while some people have represented the war as a popular cause, the truth was fairly different. He mentions that President James Polk pushed an expansionist agenda to excuse his conquest of México, and the press supported his actions by lying about the conflict and popular response to it. Zinn argues that soldiers and the public did not like the invasion of México at all. Thousands of soldiers died from disease and desertion. Zinn’s main argument is that the invasion of México was labeled as a defensive action to gain support from soldiers and the public, but it was still seen as a war by many, and the public did not gain anything significant. The public generally thought the war was useless.…
The U.S had a clear and valid reason on why they needed to move into Mexico. Mexico, essentially, invited Americans to live in the province of Texas, which turned out to be a bad idea in the end. So, was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? The answer to that question would be yes, the U.S was justified in going to war with Mexico because their population was overgrowing and they needed more land, their economic depressions made people want to live in frontier areas, and living in frontier areas would create many new opportunities for commerce and self-advancement.…
Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? This question is hard to answer as there were many reasons on both sides of the argument. However, in my opinion, the answer would be no.…
One reason the Mexican War was not justified was because the United States stole land from Mexico. In Document A, it states that Anglo-Saxons have began building schools and other buildings in California, which, at the time, still belonged to Mexico. Document D talks about how the U.S. citizens just moved into Texas simply because of Manifest Destiny-- the idea that the United States should expand. This evidence shows the U.S. was not justified in going to war because they basically stole most of Mexico’s land by moving onto them or marking them with their own property such as…
If it wasn’t for the Mexican War, the western land would be still be apart of Mexico. Mexico didn’t like the idea of the United States’s attempt to buy a large part of their country. There was also a border dispute between Mexico. Near the Rio Grande, Mexico troops had attacked the US Army. Was the Mexican War justified? The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because of Mexico’s treatment of Slidell, sixteen Americans killed by them, and attacked the US near the Rio Grande.…
Americans was justified in going in war with Mexico since Mexico didn’t exert any governmental help towards Texas, in which already had Americans there, where some were killed because of Mexicans. Mexico did not endeavor any governmental authority over Texas. Many Americans were already in Texas, and Mexico had attacked Texans. Yes, United States was justified in going to war with…
On the other hand, some people say that the war with Mexico was justified. This point of view makes sense because in paragraph three of the background essay, it says that Mexico upset with losing Texas welcomed settlers from the United States into their country. However, the United States wasn’t justified in going to war with Mexico. Therefore, the war with Mexico wasn’t justified.…
Mexico was interfering with the U.S’ belief in Manifest Destiny. The U.S believed they had a right to overspread the continent with their constantly increasing population. By preventing the expansion of the U.S, Mexico was limiting their greatness and challenging their power. Taking land will benefit both Mexico and the U.S (Doc A). The U.S would bring education, farming, industry, and democracy as they expanded across the country. This would bring a more civilized lifestyle under U.S laws, which would benefit Mexico in the eyes of the U.S. The United States was justified in going to war, because Mexico was preventing the expansion of the U.S, and therefore challenging the U.S’…
In president Polk’s declare for war on May 11, 1846 he states, “... after a long continued series of menaces, have at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soul…” This shows that Mexico took over America territory and killed 16 American soldiers without neigotate or any greetings. In Document D it states “The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined, in accordance with solemn resolution of the Congress of the United States…” This tells that it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil… Also Mexico was passed the boundary of the United states, has invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon the American soil.…
At this point some Americans were growing tired of gaining more land and they found that this was necessary. “That the annexation of the whole of Mexico to the United States would be fatal to this government, whoever may doubt it, we are well convinced” (Doc. F). Americans were beginning to expand even more and more trying to get a huge territory. We end up going to war with Mexicans, winning. In Document I when see a picture comparison between the Mexican Eagle before the war which was a strong and mighty eagle in contrast to the Mexican Eagle after the war, plucked to the skin. In Document G, we are presented a cartoon displaying how some anti-Manifest Destiny. In the picture President Polk threw up on Jackson being he has eaten too many “States”. Although having pride in your country is a good thing, but there is a moment where we have to say enough is…
The sound of cannons fill the air. Rifles pop through the sound of men shouting at their soldiers. This was the sound of the Mexican-American war over Texas. The Mexican-American war was when Texas wanted to become a part of America, but Mexico was holding them back. Manifest Destiny, the attack on Taylor, and an economy benefit of the land were three ways the United States was justified in going to war with Mexico.…
The Mexican War was the first U.S. armed conflict fought on foreign soil. It began in 1846 when the President of the United States, James K. Polk, declared war with Mexico and ended with a peace treaty that ceded one third of Mexico’s territory to the United States for fifteen million dollars in 1848. Thirteen years later, the Civil War overshadowed the Mexican war causing it to become a forgotten event in American history. The long term debate on who initiated the war continues to be unsolved, which makes it the most controversial wars in American History. This essay examines each aspect of the war, including events that lead to war and events after war, and opinions on the unjust acts that occurred during the Mexican War.…
The Mexican American war was the result of the idea of “manifest destiny.” James K. Polk (the president at the time) wanted to expand America’s western border to the pacific. After the annexation of Texas, Mexico became furious and threatened to take Texas back in a powerful way. Polk had about 4000 soldiers guarding Texas while he sent John Slidell to consult with Mexicans to sell both California and New Mexico for $30,000,000. Soon Mexico’s president found out about the deal Slidell had in mind and refused to see him.…
The U.S war with Mexico continues to be a divisive topic all through America classes. The American and Mexican war was a 2 year conflict that began in 1846.At the end of end the war the U.S ended up with more land than before. Although the United States war against Mexico maybe viewed as controversial,, the war was just due to Texas needed the U.S, Government of Mexico, and violence towards Americans. Generally speaking the war was justifiable due to Texas needing the U.S. Texas only had two small forces, one had 400 people. “On February 23, 1836 Santa Ana’s troops surrounded San Antonio.…