He sets a personal deadline to complete the story, which is by dawn. And in Chapter 42, Berlin asks himself “how far Cacciato could take him?” (O’Brien 287). That quotation proves the premise of the storyline is not to see if Cacciato escapes the war, but for how long Berlin could escape. And to meet his personal deadline, Berlin speeds the story along in order to finish it, emphasizing surrealistic experiences. One key fallacy in the story emphasizing the inaccuracies is when Berlin states “money was never a problem, passports were never required” (O’Brien 295). In order to finish the story before dawn, he ignores major issues that would be prevalent in a normal
He sets a personal deadline to complete the story, which is by dawn. And in Chapter 42, Berlin asks himself “how far Cacciato could take him?” (O’Brien 287). That quotation proves the premise of the storyline is not to see if Cacciato escapes the war, but for how long Berlin could escape. And to meet his personal deadline, Berlin speeds the story along in order to finish it, emphasizing surrealistic experiences. One key fallacy in the story emphasizing the inaccuracies is when Berlin states “money was never a problem, passports were never required” (O’Brien 295). In order to finish the story before dawn, he ignores major issues that would be prevalent in a normal