Could one be happy if they lived in a society where all basic needs are provided for but the family structure we are used to, or the ability to travel to wherever or whenever we wish has limitations? Or what if happiness was pre-conditioned at birth to allow one to accept the social caste they are created into and then brainwashed to be happy? The ultimate goal of humans is to live a life of happiness; but at what cost? Some believe that food, clothing, shelter, and gainful employment, are some of the basic necessities of life. But, is happiness attained only when one’s life is full of luxuries, immediate gratification, and excess? We will evaluate happiness, family structure, and the freedom and limitation within More’s Utopia and Huxley’s Brave New World and determine the positive and negative aspects within each society.
In Book 1 of Thomas More’s Utopia, thieve suffer the consequence of being put to death, including theft of a loaf of bread in order prevent starvation. Thieves suffered the same punishment as murders …show more content…
If I had my choice of which society I would prefer to live in, it would definitely be Utopia. The work/life balance that Utopia provides definitely appeals more to my lifestyle. I prefer the ability to actively learn new things and be able to enjoy all that nature has to offer. I believe that life is enriched by experiences and not by obtaining materialism. I also like that Utopia allowed people to choose their own religious path and promoted health and well-being. I also respect the right to provide euthanasia as a humane way of dying with dignity; I watched my own mom suffer from the disease of Alzheimer’s for almost 18 years, and I do not wish the same slow, torturous death for myself. The major downfall of living in Utopia would be not being able to freely travel locally without getting a permission