Validity and Reliability of the Job Content Questionnaire in Formal and Informal Jobs in Brazil
52 SJWEH Suppl 2008, no 6
Validity and reliability of the job content questionnaire in formal and informal jobs in Brazil by Tânia Maria de Araújo, PhD,1 Robert Karasek, PhD 2 de Araújo TM, Karasek R. Validity and reliability of the job content questionnaire in formal and informal jobs in Brazil. SJWEH Suppl. 2008;(6):52–59.
Objectives This study evaluated the job content questionnaire (JCQ) in measuring work psychology aspects with respect to formal and informal jobs in Brazilian occupational groups.
Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in a random sample of 1311 ≥15-year-old residents in the urban area of the city of Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil. The Portuguese JCQ version included the recommended 49-item of the original version. The JCQ performance evaluation included descriptive analysis, discriminant analysis, internal consistency, and construct validity.
Results Averages of the JCQ scales were similar for the formal and informal workers, except for decision authority (formal job: c=31.9; informal jobs: c=34.5). The averages of the Portuguese JCQ scales did not differ substantially from those obtained in other European, North American, and Japanese studies, albeit they were slightly lower in the Brazilian case. In general, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients revealed performance similar to other large-sample studies, showing acceptable internal consistency. The coefficients were relatively similar for formal and informal jobs. Factor analysis revealed high consistency with the theoretical model.
Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate JCQ performance comparing formal and informal jobs in a developing country. The job content questionnaire presented a good global performance, and it did not differ substantially from those observed in other studies. These findings suggest that the job content questionnaire can be used in studies carried out in developing countries and in situations in which informal jobs are common.
Key terms decision
Validity and reliability of the job content questionnaire in formal and informal jobs in Brazil by Tânia Maria de Araújo, PhD,1 Robert Karasek, PhD 2 de Araújo TM, Karasek R. Validity and reliability of the job content questionnaire in formal and informal jobs in Brazil. SJWEH Suppl. 2008;(6):52–59.
Objectives This study evaluated the job content questionnaire (JCQ) in measuring work psychology aspects with respect to formal and informal jobs in Brazilian occupational groups.
Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in a random sample of 1311 ≥15-year-old residents in the urban area of the city of Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil. The Portuguese JCQ version included the recommended 49-item of the original version. The JCQ performance evaluation included descriptive analysis, discriminant analysis, internal consistency, and construct validity.
Results Averages of the JCQ scales were similar for the formal and informal workers, except for decision authority (formal job: c=31.9; informal jobs: c=34.5). The averages of the Portuguese JCQ scales did not differ substantially from those obtained in other European, North American, and Japanese studies, albeit they were slightly lower in the Brazilian case. In general, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients revealed performance similar to other large-sample studies, showing acceptable internal consistency. The coefficients were relatively similar for formal and informal jobs. Factor analysis revealed high consistency with the theoretical model.
Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate JCQ performance comparing formal and informal jobs in a developing country. The job content questionnaire presented a good global performance, and it did not differ substantially from those observed in other studies. These findings suggest that the job content questionnaire can be used in studies carried out in developing countries and in situations in which informal jobs are common.
Key terms decision
References: 2. Araujo TM, Aquino E, Menezes G, Santos CO, Aguiar L. Work psychosocial aspects and psychological distress among nurses Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:424–33. 3. Alves MGM, Chor D, Faerstein E, Lopes CS, Werneck GL. Short version of the “Job Stress Scale: Portuguese-language adaptation. Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38:164–71. 4. Karasek R. Job demand, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24:285–308. 8. Kawakami N, Fujigaki Y. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Job Content Questionnaire: replication and extension in computer company employees. Ind Health. 1996;34:295–306. 9. Karasek RA, Kawakami N, Brisson C, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessment of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–55. 10. Brisson B, Blanchette C, Guimont C, Dion G, Moisan J, Vezina M. Reliability and validity of the French version of the 18-item Karasek Job Content Questionnaire. Work Stress. 1998;12:322–36. 14. Pelfrene E, Clays E, Moreau M, Mak R, Vlerick P, Kornitzer M, et al. The Job Content Questionnaire: methodological considerations and challenges for future research. Arch Public Health. 2003;61:53–74. 15. Ferrario M, Fornari C, Borchini R, Merluzzi F, Cesana G. Job stress in the service industry—evaluation of the Italian version of the Job Content Questionnaire. Med Lav. 2005;96:191–9. 17. Cheng Y, Luh W-M, Guo Y-L. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Job Content Questionnaire in Taiwanese workers. Int J Behav Med. 2003;10:15–30. 22. Pelfrene E, Vlerick P, Mak RP, Smets P, Kornitzer M, Backer G. Scale reliability of the Karasek’ Job Demand-Control-Support model in the Belstress. Work Stress. 2001;15(4):297–313. 24. Schreurs PJG, Taris TW. Construct validity of the demand-control: a double cross-validation approach. Work Stress. 1998;12:66–84. 25. De Jonge J, Reuvers MM, Houtman I, Bongers PM, Kompier MAJ. A critical examination of the demand-control-support model from a work psychological perspective. Int J Stress Manag. 1977;4:235–58. 26. Van der Doef M, Maes S. The Job Demand-Control (-Support) Model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress. 1999;13:87–114.