Preview

Valuate the View That Oligarchy Exists Within Traditional Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Valuate the View That Oligarchy Exists Within Traditional Power
Evaluate the view that Oligarchy exists within traditional power structures.
Oligarchy is where a small group of people having full control of a country, organisation or institution.
On the one hand, the view that Oligarchy exists within traditional structures is agreed with by the Elite theorists. This is because the elite theorists such as Pareto saw society as divided between the rulers and the ruled. They believe that society is ruled by one small powerful Elite, the ruling class. For example, the Government rule of society as they are able to implement laws and rules which people within society have to abide with. It exists within traditional power structures as the Government has been a traditional power holder in recent years.
Similarly, Marxists also agree with the view that oligarchy exists within traditional power structures. Karl Marx said that only the bourgeoisie held power in society and that power only exists with one person or group at one time, this is the zero sum model. One example of this is industrial work places, such as factories. This supports the view that oligarchy exists within traditional power structure, because since industrialisation period began, the factories owners who control the means of production take nearly all of the profit whereas the workers do most of the hard labour only get a small profit of the money earned. Furthermore, this view is also supported by feminists. Feminists believe that society is highly patriarchal and oligarchy does exist within traditional power structures. This is because feminists argue that men oppress women and they always have. In terms with oligarchy, men have always had power over women so therefore it exists within traditional power structures. Similarly, Lukes ideology of shaping desires also supports the view of oligarchy. Lukes suggested that the powerful groups are able to make people think what they want. For example, the government as all of the different political parties try and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Comparative Book Review: Making the Case or Beating the System? Charles T. Goodsell, The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004). 208 pp. $COST (paper), ISBN: 9781568029078. Russell L. Ackoff and Sheldon Rovin, Beating the System: Using Creativity to Outsmart Bureaucracies (San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 2005).…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Summary

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages

    31. Oligarchy: Form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small segment of society distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, corporate, or military…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oligarchy by Alyssa Raulerson An oligarchy is a form of government where a small group of people rule. Oligarchy originates from Medieval Latin and Greek. Some examples of oligarchies include Sparta and modern-day Africa in the twentieth century. It is easy to see since the South African form of oligarchy was based on race. There are many forms of oligarchy, used all around the world.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an elitist government it is believed that only a select few of people should hold political power. People who are maybe from a higher class or wealthier than the others form the group of elites. Elitist point of views are taking much more serious and carefully than those who are outsiders to this group.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Gove Study Guide

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages

    Elite – identifiable group of persons who possess a disproportionate share of some valued resource- in this case political power…

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Many of our terms for describing the distribution of political power are derived from the ancient Greeks, who were the first Western people to study politics systematically. A society in which political decisions were controlled by a small group was called an oligarchy, meaning rule by a few members of the elite, who generally benefited themselves. Another form of rule by the few was known as aristocracy, meaning rule by the most virtuous, the most talented, or the best suited to the position. Later in European history, aristocracy meant rule by the titled or the upper classes. In contrast to such a top-down form of control was the form known as anarchy, or the condition of no government. Anarchy exists when each individual makes his or her own rules for behavior, and there are no laws and no…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elitism: elite theory is a theory of the state which seeks to describe and explain the power relationships in contemporary society…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first one is a monarchy. A monarchy is defined as a form of government in which power is vested in hereditary kings and queens who govern in the interests of all. One example of this type of government would be England. A second type of government is totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is a form of government in which power resides in a leader who rules based on his self-interest and has no regard for individual rights and liberties. A prime example of this would be Iraq when Suddam Hussein was in power. Just from that example alone we can completely come to similar conclusion of the definition itself. An oligarchy is a third form of government in which the right to participate is conditioned on the possession of wealth, social status, military position or some type of achievement. This type of government is very rare these days and are usually located in countries such as India and North Africa. The fourth type of government is the type of government that America has and is called a democracy. A democracy gives power to the people, whether it is directly or through the elected representatives. Democracy is the preferred type of government in the majority of the countries…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    But today, the politically powerful and wealthy dominate our society, economy, and government. The powerful minority or the social class has never been more distinct and disturbing in the American society than it is now. The nation is divided not only by partisan politics, culture, race, religion, and age, it is divided by what we do or what we have – or do not have. Political, business, and academic elites have embraced the vision of the world that supersedes our mere nation with the only goal of making money and power, erasing the middle class, and crating a proletariat deprived of economic opportunity, fair wages, and voice in Washington D.C. But is that a true state of democracy that United States of America has built on or it’s just a façade that induces passive acceptance of the elite rule? The media, education system, campaign industry, and government leaders constantly shape the American politics changing it to a form, far more different than the democratic theory, a form also known as oligarchy.…

    • 3373 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plutocracy In America

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Americans are conditioned to see our present form of government as a representative democracy where power is in the hands of all the people. Until this assignment I realize did not understand plutocracy or the fact that we may already be living in a plutocracy. A plutocracy is defined as "government by the wealthy." A political system where power is concentrated in the hands of a small number of wealthy people, usually those with inherited wealth and wealthy families. At the top of every society an ironic mixture of those who are there by merit and capability and those who merely grab, hoard, and wield power and wealth. Every nation has its many, the general populace, and its few, the elite who dominate, rule, and favor themselves with wealth and privilege. It is and always has been the way of the world. It is not difficult to understand why this is so, why every society and nation forms itself into the many and the dominant few.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hyperpluralism

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12. The traditionalistic perspective reinforces the belief that economic and political elites should be power brokers in society and that government should function to serve their interests.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oligarchy: A country that is controlled by a small group of people. The definition of democracy has been forgotten when it comes to the election process. Some people even sum up the election process as a way of oligarchy government would do it. This isn't the way our government worked before and it shouldn't work like that ever. We have been bought up from our forefathers as a country where everyone's voices should be heard but apparently it isn't how we imagined it to be today.…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upholding the beliefs of traditionalism, a reverence of old ways, is increasingly becoming a rare occurrence in our modernized society. Although useful to society, no longer does a majority of the world’s citizens strongly support traditional ideals. In the past, tradition played an important role in maintaining stability in a civilization. During the eras where communism and totalitarianism dominated, traditional governing methods proved effective, although not necessarily ethical, providing society with stability. The traditionalism exhibited throughout those centuries laid the groundwork for a necessary change to democratic and liberal ways. Traditionalism provisioned the base of society’s stability, but it is no longer needed to sustain it. A movement to new ways of governing have allowed citizens to prosper and stimulate their own economy’s, successfully maintaining a sense of safety when dealing with our world’s current economic situations.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays