The company soon became involved in politics and an agent of British imperialism. The company made direct business with India, this allowed Britain to establish an control. Historian have stated that the rulers of India welcomed the company. One such example has been stated by Saul David ‘In 1613 Akbar's successor, Jahangir Khan allowed the east india company to locate a trading post at surat on the north coast of bombay.’ This event in history was like a stepping stone for Britain, as time had progressed the company grew. It was more dominant in India than its competitors from the other european empires such as France. Its sales made up a percentage of Britain's total imports meaning that there is a link to the east india company and the british empire. Having a more successful industry than others guarantees that trading and resources will be at its peak. Due to this, competition for land becomes scarce and that allows further expansion. It is clear that the empire used this to their advantage allowing them to further control India by dominating its cities by bringing stability among their …show more content…
Parliament licensed to operate as a military force.’ In addition, creating a more stabilized relation with the natives allowing the company to further grow. ‘The British government also strengthened its control over its colonies. The India act 1784 created a board responsible to parliament to which the east India company had to report.’ The east India act of 1784 brought the companies complete rule to a close and allowed the British government to oversee the rule as well as the east india company. Evidence of how the empire manipulated India through the company. Consequently, this act was supported by the local Indian rulers which brought about further control of India to Britain. In addition, cities that had been under other european controls had been diminished. With no rival it became easier for the company to expand its industry, which could then be manipulated by the empire. Therefore, the company brought about rule in India through trading and bringing stability. Having a direct link to the empire allowed Britain to manipulate acts or rules in India through the