Violent Media Is Good For Kids Analysis

An article called “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” that was written by Gerard Jones, a renowned comic- book author, is arguing that violent media can be helpful for children, rather than be harmful. He talks about how parents don’t take the time to look at how helpful violent media can be for their child. Violence can encourage children to learn how to reach for their own inner power that they may have never been able to find before. Children as they grow up can learn the positives and negatives of violence, which can help them later on in their future choices. As for with “creative violence-head bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, playground karate, ty guns- give children a tool to master their rage”, this term is correlated to the idea
He starts off the article by stating “my parents, not trusting the violent world of the late 1960s, built a wall between me and the crudest elements of American pop culture”. He then explains that once he was allowed to view such content such as comic books he “suddenly had a fantasy self to carry my stifled rage and burned desire for power.” In the later future he gets inspired by the power the Hulk possessed and then gained confidence within himself to then become a writer. Readers are most likely to believe his claims that violent media can help kids, due to his experiences of using violent media to improve himself as a child and when he grew up. Another appeal he uses to show he is knowledgeable about the subject is by explaining how he is a parent as well and is seeing how exposure to violent media is affecting his son. He goes further into detail about how he exposed his son to violent media to overcome some fears he had. He states “I took my cue from his fantasies and read him old Tarzan comics, rich in combat and bright with flashing knives. For two weeks he lived in them. Then he put them aside. And he climbed the tress.” This helps his claim by providing readers both his and his son’s experiences of how they both showed good outcomes of being exposed to such media with gaining confidence rather than gaining negative violent behavior. Yet, he also demonstrates an awareness of his audience’s assumptions of how violent media could promote violent tendencies or acts to be acceptable to children. He states “I’m not going to argue that violent entertainment is harmless. He then is explaining how he isn’t going to say that exposure to violent media is fully nontoxic to a person’s mind even a child’s. This overall helps to strengthens his