Preview

Virginia and Massachusetts in Terms of Economy and Society: a Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
660 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Virginia and Massachusetts in Terms of Economy and Society: a Comparison
During the time period of the colonization in the Americas, people from all over Europe came with their own desires and hopes for this strange and mysterious land. Some came for religious freedom, and some came for wealth, fame, and glory. No matter what purpose they had, they all piled onto a boat and sailed a vigorous journey to the continent of North America. As the people settled and founding colonies, people with certain desires decided to go to a particular colony because of how the colony functioned and how its viewpoints ere set. Don’t StealTwo colonies, Virginia and Massachusetts, were part of England’s expansion into the new world. Virginia, located in the Southern colonies, was founded mainly for an economic purpose, while Massachusetts was founded by colonists seeking religious freedom. These and many other reasons illustrate that it doesn’t matter who rules a colony- there can still be many differences between the two.
The society in Virginia compared to Massachusetts are very different. Don’t StealOne thing is that they attracted different kinds of people depending on each colony’s environment. The settlement in Virginia was mainly formed for financial reasons while Massachusetts was conceived of by a group of Puritan separatists from the English Church seeking religious freedom. Virginia was known for the production of “cash crops”, such as tobacco. Since colonists were unable to find any gold in the new world, they decided to profit via means of agriculture. In Massachusetts, The Puritans that settled there proposed only to form a “purified” version of the Anglican Church from England. The Puritans were a busy, educated, and somewhat industrious group of people. The Massachusetts colony consisted of non-separatists reformers. Overall, Massachusetts wanted an educated and religion-oriented society.
The land and labor in both colonies were different as well, but mainly by means of available workers. Don’t StealThe land in Virginia was abundant, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Chesapeake colony and the New England colony both migrated from England due to oppression. The Chesapeake colony consisted of second sons who could not inherit family heir-looms or money; it also consisted of indentured servants who did not have the proper skills to sustain a job in England. The New England colony consisted of Puritans who left England after Charles I took the throne and ordered England a strictly Anglican society. Although they were oppressed and both fled England, the two colonies came out to be vastly different from one another.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I discuss the differences in these two colonies, I would like to give you some background information on them. Massachusetts was a New England Colony founded by John Winthrop in 1628. King James the first founded Virginia in1607. The first colony of Virginia was Jamestown. Massachusetts’ first two communities, Boston and Salem, were developed around the same time. Both Virginia and Massachusetts were royal colonies.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virginia and Massachusetts were both colonies that were set up by the British empire, they were both some of the most populated colonies and most economically thriving. They both were setup by people who crossed to the New World from England, and…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The New England and the Chesapeake Colonies were two very distinct colonies. The colonist came to the Americas in order to escape religious toleration and economic prosperity. As time passed the colonist were changed by their different surroundings. Although the New England and Chesapeake colonies both had English immigrants, they differentiated due to economic, social, and religious causes. In contrast the colonies were very different societies.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main cause for the differences in their economy is due to the climate and location of each of the colonies. For example, the Virginia colony had good fertile soil and had the perfect weather condition for growing crops, while on the other hand, Massachusetts was a mountainous region that did not have as good of soil. Because of this, Virginia’s economy was based on crops, mainly tobacco, and the Massachusetts colony had to find other ways to use their natural resources to boast their economy. The Massachusetts colony had a lot of forests and trees, so they specialized in shipbuilding. The New England economy also consisted of fishing, and a small amount of crops, but nothing comparable to what Virginia was putting out in tobacco. The economy was clearly more diverse in the Massachusetts colony but there was something the Virginia colony had that Massachusetts did not, and that was land. Because there was an abundant amount of cheap land, it drew more colonists to that region. Another part of their contrasting economy was trade. Virginia was involved in the triangular trade, which traded slaves from Africa with goods from the colonies and England. Massachusetts trade differed from that of the south in two ways, “The lack of staples to exchange for English goods was a relative disadvantage, but the abundance of their own shipping and mercantile enterprise worked in their favor” (Tindall, 123).…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay explains and shows the differences between the Virginia colony and the Massachusetts colony. People all over Europe started coming down to the “new world” (America), they came to the new world for many reasons such as land, food, religion and much more. Before I start to contrast between the 2 colonies I’m going to give a general background on them. Massachusetts was established in 1620 and Virginia was established in 1607. Virginia’s colony was Jamestown and Massachusetts was Salem and Boston.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis Statement: The similarities and differences between the early English settlements in Virginia with those of the Spanish in other parts of the New World are both suffered from famine and poor nutrition, both ended moving to a new place, and the the English settlement actually prospered and lasted till present day USA.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The variations within the share of categories were improbably massive and their entire economic structure differed from one another. Virginia had additional risky culture and social science where-as Massachusetts had an additional stable economy. The economy of Virginia was primarily based exclusively on the assembly of tobacco. The plantation homeowners had to shop for slaves to figure the fields that the slave traffic trade in Virginia was conjointly an enormous issue. The plantation homeowners were within the terribly made, elite class and just about ran the politics.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A main societal difference between the colonies in Virginia and the ones in Massachusetts is religion. Whereas the Virginian colonies were declared as Anglican, the colonies of Massachusetts were Puritan. An important point to be made here is that Massachusetts’ colonies were actually founded for religious reasons. The Puritans came to America to escape religious persecution…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 17th and 18th century, English populace felt that England was over-crowded and oppressive. They longed to mitigate the problems that arose because of the exaggerated population boom and to establish a government that would allot them the freedom they thought they deserved. The English believed that the best way to go about this was to colonize the New World. Subsequently, many colonies began to develop, and of these colonies, Massachusetts and Virginia were the most well-known. The early settlements of the Massachusetts and Virginia were both established by similar groups of people at the same time; however, their contrasting beginnings as a colony, views on religion, and means of economic stability created two different politics and economic systems.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious views and importance differentiated greatly between the two colonies. New Englanders, the area in which the Massachusetts Bay Colony settled, came to America to exercise religious beliefs that were not allowed before the English Civil War and after the Restoration. They were made up of Protestant sects, mostly Puritans. This religion defined almost every aspect of New England life. Religion was much less significant in Virginia. The main church was the Anglican Church of England, however church attendance and rules did not dictate settlers' actions or goals.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virginia and Massachusetts were the first two colonies settled by England in the New World. However, these colonies were very different from each other. Virginia’s economy, based heavily on slaves and other low-class workers, resulted in a very small, rich class having all influence and power. Massachusetts, in contrast, had an economy with a large middle class of “equals,” resulting in a more democratic government than that of Virginia. Overall, the first two English colonies in the Americas had extremely separate ways of creating economic and Economic development usually has a lasting influence on the political structure of any up-and-coming area. This certainly was the case for Virginia and Massachusetts. The Southern economy was based on the production of cash crops, predominantly tobacco, rice, and indigo. Crops were grown on large plantations that, by the mid 1600’s, had begun to use African slaves and lowly whites as the labor source. This meant that a lot of people worked for only a few people. Thus, the plantation owners tended to be wealthy, and they acted like it too. Many landowners hired a person in England to ship them goods that would fit the lifestyle. As a result, the South was cash poor, but the land and products owned had great potential value. The Massachusetts economy could not have been more different. Although the use of slaves and other servants did exist, it was miniscule compared to what was occurring in Virginia. Also, while plantation success depended on one system that could fail at any time, the Northern economy was more stable and diverse. In part because of the landscape, the Massachusetts colony was dependent on anything from shipbuilding, fishing, and whaling to farming, store-owning, and other types of artisan work. This allowed for a flexible economy with a large middle class that likely would survive if one market crashed. Meanwhile, if there had been a drought or drop in demand for tobacco, the whole Southern economy would have…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundations of the colonies were different. The New England colonies were founded because the founders wanted freedom of religion. The founders of these colonies were the Puritans. They came to this New World so they can build a society and win God’s favor not only economically but as wells as religiously. They wanted a government that would have God involved around it. Virginia in the other hand was one of the earliest settlements in the New World and was established by over 1,200 settlers. The Virginia colony was one of the first colonies to have elected legislature called the House of Burgesses. These people wanted to become economically wealthy.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colonies and the Southern colonies are slightly similar in some aspects, but drastically different in most. For example the new england colonies were strictly puritan and they did not tolerate any other religion but the southern colonies were not dominated by a single religion which gave way to more liberal attitudes and some religious freedom. The economy of New England was powered mostly the manufacturing in factories, whereas the Southern colonies’ economies were more agriculturally based. The social structures were different, because the New England colonies didn’t believe in slavery, so the social ladders were not the same. Religious tolerance was another major difference in these two regions. Overall the New England and Southern colonies are slightly similar, but their differences set them apart from each other.`…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The motives for moving to the New World behind the two colonial areas helped shape the differences between the Chesapeake and New England societies. Many of the ships going to the Chesapeake region in the 1600’s consisted of single people, mostly men, in search for wealth, gold, and a better life in the New World. At least one third of the freemen in Virginia in 1673 were single freemen (Doc. G). With the residents of the Chesapeake being mainly single men at this time, it only made sense that their motive behind moving to the New World was to find wealth. They had no responsibilities other than themselves; therefore, the want for wealth would be appealing more so to single men causing the Chesapeake colonies to be a majority of this group of people. On the contrary, most people who migrated to New England did so as a way to find religious freedom. This meant that New England colonies would be inhabited mainly by families and couples who held their religion high as a priority. On a ship’s list of emigrants bound for New England in 1635,…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays