Voluntary Argumentative Analysis

Green rejects voluntary slave contracts in a free society founded on the idea that a totally free society should enable all of its citizens to be able to work freely. This also includes the right to enter into labor contracts, without giving up their rights to health and life. He argues that in a free society, each individual must be able to contribute positively to society in some other way outside of their labor. He also claims that a society should be able to prevent an even outlaw voluntary slavery contracts because even if it is voluntary, the slave is put into a position that denies the ability to work as a healthy and contributing member of society and in to a situation of servitude.
In contrast, libertarians and neoclassical liberals like Nozick may defend a person’s right to enter into a voluntary slave contract with another based on the idea of complete freedom for someone to do whatever they wish with themselves and their property. Those groups see labor as a simple business transaction between two people. This is where a worker can sell his time,
You cannot rid yourself of free will and even if you currently volunteer yourself into slavery, your future self could change your mind and want out. At this point you are no longer a volunteer but forced to be held. Thus, the term volunteer slave is contradictory at best and in no way can be used in a legal contract. However, it is incumbent on the civil society to set the stage for this idea to be unheard of. Societies or governments should set up healthcare, provide educational opportunities, and pass laws that encourage safe and fair working conditions that eliminate the need to give or sell one’s self into bondage. If someone was to feel the need to sell themselves into slavery then society and the government around it has failed as a whole and will eventually