Preview

How Did Congregating At Fort Monroe Lead Up To The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
723 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Congregating At Fort Monroe Lead Up To The Civil War
Congregating at Fort Monroe, before heading north, General McClellan and his troops moved slowly toward Richmond. Along the sluggish march toward the Confederacy’s capitol, runaway slaves filled Union camps and provided the Union with valuable intelligence on enemy fortifications, geography, and troop count. Although some information given by the slaves may have been elaborated, the significant assistance slaves provided the Union did not go unnoticed. Abolitionists were using this narrative as a call to arms. They argued that if the Confederacy was using slaves to their advantage, the Union should do the same. By freeing slaves, the Union would weaken the south by dismantling their treasured institution. Furthermore, many public figures urged …show more content…
Radicals like Senator Charles Sumner said the Union would not again have the “opportunity,” to free slaves during peace time. Most pro-emancipationists believed that they could only free the slaves during the war. The Second Confiscation Act was an attempt to do just that. It would allow the Union to Confiscate slaves in any area of rebellion if the owners did not surrender to the Union. Critics of the bill argued that it would inspire more Southerners to join the Confederate forces and encourage the border states to secede from the Union. There were also warnings that slaves would “flood northern communities.” Nevertheless, if slavery were to be preserved, Republicans argued, the issue would once again overwhelm the nation after the war. It would be a “never ending controversy.” Additionally, Republicans believed that ending slavery would be an act of fairness to the slaves who aided the Union. Republican newspapers and politicians pointed out the assistance provided by slaves to the Union. They noted how the slaves were, “faithful, and useful.” To pro-emancipationists, it was an injustice that slaves were offered no reward for their loyalty on the …show more content…
Following the army’s disappointment, it was widely accepted that the rebellion would not be suppressed easily. As the “discouraged” soldiers made the retreat down the Peninsula, there were mixed rationales among the troops as to why their operation failed. What was universally accepted, however, was that the American fighters were fatigued. The American public understood that their army did not have the same labor support the Confederacy had sustained with slaves. McClellan’s defeat at Richmond helped to guide the United States toward emancipation. Inspiring the north to take a more aggressive stance with the rebels, the use of black labor by the Union seemed to be a necessity. To relieve the overworked soldiers, the employment of slaves as laborers was essential for the North. After a lengthy debate, the stalled Second Confiscation Act was eventually passed. Politicians rationalized that if the south used slaves as “instruments of war,” they should be “liable for confiscation.” In fact, all property was liable for confiscation. However, the bill had its weaknesses. Tricky loopholes that required court mandated approvals stripped some teeth of the law. Regardless, a few days following the bills passage, Lincoln had decided he would issue his famous proclamation, that declared all slaves in a state of rebellion, “forever free.” All he needed was a decisive victory to present his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There were many plus sides to the Civil War. Those plus sides were the abolishment of slavery, secession was refuted, and there was supremacy of national government. Yet, there was one difficulty which was that the Union had the challenge of figuring out what to do with free slaves. In 1867, Congress took control of Reconstruction to establish and protect citizenship rights. Congress had succeeded in many ways like having the Southern states ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to rid the military forces. But, by 1877 the Reconstruction had ended, all the work done failed, and everything reversed. Congress’ Reconstruction efforts to have equal rights for freedmen failed because the Ku Klux Klan intervened in wrong ways, freedmen were convinced to stop their actions, and editorial advocating was used as propaganda against freedmen.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first few years of the Civil War, there was a consensus in the Union that the war was being fought over the Confederacy’s claims to protection of slave property and the power states’ rights over the federal government. Originally, the war was not fought for the emancipation of African-American slaves in the South. Major Benjamin Butler of the Union army was unsure of the status of fugitive slaves he encountered in the South and he asked the secretary of war if Union forces have the right to liberate these people [A]. Additionally, Major Butler realized that these African-American men, women, and children could potentially be helpful in the Union’s war effort [A]. Over time, President Lincoln and the Union recognized the aid that African…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed slaves should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and slave owners.” (5 Things You May Not Know About Lincoln, Slavery and Emancipation. (2012, September 21). Retrieved April 3, 2015, from http://www.history.com/news/5-things-you-may-not-know-about-lincoln-slavery-and-emancipation…

    • 1517 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ideologies that drove citizens to combat in the Civil War varied dramatically between Northern and Southern soldiers. Many soldiers who enlisted in the Federal Army of the North did so as to preserve the young nation, which had less than a century ago, gained its independence from England. The idea of “freeing the slaves” was a very small concern in the minds…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, many slaves slowed down their work or refused to work at all. In this way, they hoped to weaken the South's war effort. They knew that when victorious Union troops arrived in their area, they would be free. Thousands of enslaved African Americans took direct action to free themselves. Whenever a Union army appeared, slaves from all over the area would flee their former masters.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South feared that their rights to slavery were in jeopardy with the election of Republican, Abraham Lincoln. However, the election of Lincoln was not a mandate for the abolition of slavery in the United States. Lincoln's primary platform while running for president was to stop the spread of slavery, not to abolish it. His Republican principles were the foundation for his disapproval of slavery. However, Lincoln realized that slavery was protected by the constitution and that he did not hold the power to abolish slavery. The popular votes showed that more than half of the population did not vote for Lincoln. The outcome of the election was not a mandate to end slavery because Lincoln did not receive the majority of the popular votes and he had no intention of abolishing slavery.…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Dupree & Fisehl, Jr, 1960 p.472) However, while the idea of ending slavery in the south to aid the North in the Civil War it also had unintended consequences. First there was a division of labor in New York between wealth upper class citizens and lower poor class citizens of Irish background. The idea of emancipating slaves lead to unrest of labor competition in the north. In addition there was already a draft that was occurring at the time that conflicted with the higher and lower class citizens where the higher class citizens can buy or substitute themselves from the draft whereas the lower class are unable to have said privilege.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery and the Civil War As slavery came to end at the end of the Civil War the South still had issues with letting it go. Slaves, at the time in 1865, were still treated like trash, abused, neglected, and disrespected by the whites that believed they still had their hands on them. The whites at that time rationalized their actions by saying their economy would falter. They wouldn’t have the hands to work crops therefor value of cotton, tobacco, rice, or any other crop would go down taking the economy with it. They also fought it by bringing up that even in the earliest time for human-kind there were slaves.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He was afraid of arming African Americans, particularly former or escaped slaves, would push the loyal border states to secede. This, in turn, would make it almost impossible for the Union to win the war. As the Civil War loomed on, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. Although the Emancipation Proclamation was limited, freeing only those slaves living in states that were in rebellion against the federal government, Lincoln’s issuance of the Proclamation didn’t changed his position about the underlying constitutional issue, but he justified the proclamation as a war measure, necessary to weaken the Confederacy’s ability to continue the war it also reflects his understanding of the importance of abolition to preserving the…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fugitive Slave Acts

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By the middle of the nineteenth century, the issue of slavery had caused a deep division between North and South. Slavery was an important part of the Southern way of life, and slave labor was a major aspect of the Southern states' economy. Northerners opposed slavery yet were concerned that the political, economic, and conflict with the South over slavery could threaten a civil war between the two sides. The conflict intensified over the issue of fugitive, or escaped, slaves. Because slaves were treated as property in the South, slave owners felt it was their right to seek out and recapture slaves who had escaped to free Northern states. Northerners tended to view this practice as kidnapping. Many wondered if officials in the free states had a right not to interfere with the slave owner or in fact had the power to declare the slave a free person. Article 4, section 2 of the Constitution stated that slaves who escaped to free states had to be surrendered to their owners upon demand. Although the Constitution recognized the institution of slavery and the rights of slave owners, it was still unclear just what the law required of the people and officials in free states in regard to the matter of fugitive slaves. In other words, enforcement of the Constitution on this matter was a gray area decades before the Civil War.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louisiana Purchase

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Abraham Lincoln signed The Emancipation Proclamation on June 1, 1863, he intended to emancipate all slaves of the southern states, which no longer belonged to The Union. This order applied only to slaves in Confederate-held lands however, which essentially made this Proclamation a “hollow decree”. Lincoln was conscious of what he was doing however, and he knew that once word of The Emancipation Proclamation spread, it would motivate slave rebellions even more, and encourage slaves to escape and fight for their…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Allen C. Guezlo opens his book on the defensive for Abraham Lincoln. Guezlo explains that when the topic of Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation comes to mind, basically, either you appreciate it at face value for what it accomplished and stands for, or you are a skeptic. Today more than ever, the Proclamation’s skeptics focus on what the document did not accomplish rather than what it did. In his book, Guezlo works at answering the four main questions that critics will raise regarding the Proclamation. Why is the language of the Proclamation so bland and Legalistic? Did the Proclamation actually do anything? Did the slaves free themselves? Did Lincoln issue the Proclamation to ward off European influence or boost Union morale? In defense of Lincoln, Guezlo takes us through a detailed chronology of the events leading up to the weighted decision made by Lincoln in September 1862, including incredible evidence in the form of documented conversations and eye witness accounts.…

    • 3073 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abraham Lincoln gave the speech called the “Emancipation Proclamation” which states “All persons held as slaves… shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free” This means that the slaves were going to be freed unless states would rebel. He promised it would have a positive outcome to giving the slaves their freedom.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Abolition

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President Lincoln determined that emancipating slaves in the regions of rebellion that were not under Federal control was “warranted by the Constitution” as “a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion.” The Confederacy…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: DiLorenzo, Thomas J. (2002). The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War. Detroit, Michigan: Detroit Publishing Company. Foner, Eric. A review of Forced into Glory: Abraham Lincoln 's White Dream, Los Angeles Times Book Review, 9 Apr 2000, accessed Dec 14, 2008. Goodwin, Doris Kearns. A Team of Rivals, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005 Guelzo, Allen C. (2005). Lincoln 's Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America. Simon and Schuster,p.18. Kolchin, Peter (1994). American Slavery: 1619-1877. New York: Hill & Wang.p.82. Miller, Steven (2008). Freedmen & Southern Society Project. Retrieved December 14, 2008, Web site: http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/chronol.htm. Nevins, Allen. (1960) Ordeal of the Union: vol 6. War Becomes Revolution, 1862-1863. .Slave Census (1860) Retrieved December 13, 2008, from Son of the South Web site: http://www.sonofthesouth.net/slavery/slave-maps/slave-census.htm. The Second Confiscation Act. U.S., Statutes at Large, Treaties, and Proclamations of the United States of America (1863). Vol.12, p.589-92.…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays