Walmart and Ethical Decisions

Wal-Mart Paper
Through the course of running a business, a company interacts and cooperates with many different distinct groups of people who have some kind of claim upon the company’s success. These groups are known as stakeholders and each group has a different set of goals for the company, as well as influences upon their business. One of these major stakeholders is the government, who act on a local, municipal, and federal level. The government’s regulations, authorizations, and general dealings can all have major effects on the way a company is run. These rulings, as do all actions influencing a corporation, have moral implications as well, whether ethical or unethical. It is perfectly fair for people to organize as self-governing groups and fight the damage Wal-Mart causes in communities that depend on the innovation rampant in small business operations. Cities already control the zoning laws within their limits and so they have the right to deny any proposal, therefore organized communities should be able to keep Wal-Mart out of their area. Zoning ordinances are regulations are important considerations when choosing a business location. If communities do not believe that Wal-Mart, a big box retailer will add value to their city, whether it is jobs or lower prices, then communities can reject the building of a new Wal-Mart location. Wal-Mart store openings kill local jobs. The new entry into the market does not guarantee employment opportunities nor increase overall retail activity. Wal-Mart is trying to take advantage of the current economic downturn by promising jobs and investment into local neighborhoods that have taken a hit from the recession. Government has broken up monopolies in the past and Wal-Mart makes itself a monopoly in small communities, therefore communities should be allowed to organize to help the government keep Wal-Mart out of small communities. Wal-Mart has established a successful discount department chain. In small