Preview

War Brings More Harm Than Good

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Brings More Harm Than Good
There are many wars such as The Vietnam War, The Korean War, The Persian Gulf War, The Iraq War and also The Afghanistan War. Countries go to war due to unresolvable issues and they think that by killing and destructing the most, they win the war. For example, The United States government viewed involvement in the Vietnam War as a way to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam and part of their wider strategy of containment. First and foremost, in a war nobody wins. War often results in the destruction of many properties and lives. Poison gas as a chemical weapon was principally used during the World War 1, and resulted in an estimated 91,198 deaths and 1,205,655 injuries. Chemical warfare which includes chemical, biological and nuclear is often cruel. In my opinion, going to war brings more harm than good for at least three reasons.
Firstly, there are many casualties in a war. It is estimated that 378,000 people died due to war each year between 1985 and 1994. Soldiers and civilians are not spared as many of them die due to either war injuries or diseases. Many more are disabled or suffer serious injuries, physical or mental. Even those who managed to survive may suffer from depression, anger or guilt if any of his/her loved ones did not make it. If it were not for the modern medical advances there would be thousands of more dead from disease and infection. For example, in the Iran-Iraq War, 5,000 survivors seek medical treatment regularly and about 1,000 are still hospitalized with severe chronic diseases. Women, children, the old and sick are usually the ones who suffer the most.
Secondly, there are many crimes committed during or after the war. The behavior of troops in warfare varies considerably, both individually and as units or armies. In some circumstances, troops may engage in genocide, war rape and ethnic cleansing. The unusual circumstances of warfare can incite apparently normal individuals to commit atrocities. More crimes are also committed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The reason is, as Weschler states, “Such interethnic violence usually gets stoked by specific individuals’ intent on immediate political or material advantage, who then calls forth the legacies of earlier and previously unaddressed grievances. (Weschler 784)” The author emphasizes that violence is often fueled by few individuals’ greed of political power and material gains. Hence, when we judge the immoral crimes of war criminals, it would be too rash for us to simplify or generalize that each individual of the criminal group bears the guilt and the responsibility of the war crimes. However, we cannot ignore the fact that the actions of individuals are often influenced by the pressure and the expectations of…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technological advancements and it 's new and heavy artillery in modern warfare have been racking up debt and upping the cost of war with the world 's most valuable currency: real human lives. The draft after World War Two forced American boys to pack up their bags and go off to war because it was their only choice- besides running away to Canada or Mexico to avoid it. Because some made it out, the effects of war lingered and were overlooked. The aftermath of the Vietnam War left veterans crippled with memories of the endless rice paddies and ghosts of their lost friends, and many of them were left with trauma disorders, like PTSD. The real cost of war wasn’t the $600 million spent on military and technology, but the 58,000 American lives lost and 350,000 Americans physically or mentally crippled as a result instead. The cost of any war is also the same: trading your sanity or your life for real life combat.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War led to lack of progress and held back new medical ideas from developing. Firstly, at the time a war would cost an awful lot of money, the government would be compelled to spend all their money on new military equipment and salaries for the soldiers hence the government could not afford any new medical equipment or could not give any money in helping research new medical ideas. Secondly, a war was very busy and chaotic. Due to the fact that soldiers were injured in thousands doctors did not have any time to research and develop new ideas, all of their time would be occupied in using what they already know to help cure/save a soldiers life. Lastly at the time of a war many medical books were destroyed and thus some very important and new medical ideas were lost forever causing regression in medicine. Another factor which contributed to regression in medicine was religion.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War brings death and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. Although war may not always be the first answer or the most beneficial, it is an inescapable evil because war has brought the world peace and prosperity while banding people together to fight for a cause. It leads to national growth and solves domestic problems between countries; Injustice and tyranny can be quelled as the aftereffect of war. On the contrary, war includes loss of human life, spreads of diseases, and induces a feeling of anxiety and dismay among communities. The brutal sacrifices that innocent people undergo may not be worth the outcome.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All Quiet Final

    • 702 Words
    • 1 Page

    Wars are very harmful phenomena that cause pain and harm to all of the people that…

    • 702 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is a foul and nauseating occurrence throughout history. Nevertheless, it is something that has happened more than once. There are numerous amount of people who have experienced the events of a war. Each person can have a different perspective and experiences. However, those people can be categorized as victims, perpetrators, or bystanders.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of war brings up many questions about life and death, suffering, and consequences. While many people may see war as something that affects people as a whole, such as nations or a persecuted group, war further impacts every individual, whether or not they are directly involved. War limits freedoms and individualism, and in most cases people find themselves with less rights than during peacetime. People base their choices not on what they feel, and more on what they have to do to survive. Soldiers and civilians alike are influenced by war in different ways, however, these tie together when the overall effects of war are examined.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War is a very controversial topic for many people. Depending on the person’s outlook on the war, it can be depicted as something good or bad. War brings destruction wherever it goes, whether it is on a place or the people, and it ultimately is inevitable. War also protects a country from having further destruction and keeps the people at home safe from any danger. As a person can see in many recordings of war, there are many comparisons and contrasts that are expressed through soldiers, veterans, and civilians. Some comparisons seen in many of the testimonies given by effected people are dehumanization, dislocation, and alienation; but they also have contrasts that can be seen through nationalism, technological advancements, and the coming home for many…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An army is unable to commit war atrocities, such as these, unless some process of…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is a horrible act that is fully capable of leaving scars on innocent people at horrifying scales, and can change how we see others just by the way that they were involved. War is capable of changing the perspective of entire societies.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rape and sexual assault during military armed conflicts are described as psychological warfare, thus harming and affecting the enemies emotions and feelings more than it's body. Now when carried out thoroughly and as a systematic practice, rape and sexual slavery are now recognized under the United Nations Geneva Convention as crimes against humanity and serious war crimes.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What would drive one to murder? Is there any case in which the act of taking another’s life is justified? These are some of the questions raised in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado”. In this short story, the main character Montresor meticulously plans and executes a man named Fortunato for showing him insult. To go through such lengths as these, it is apparent that honor is a very important value of Montresor’s and to diminish it in any way would be liable to the most severe of punishments. Montresor’s value of honor remains true throughout the story, unaltered even after ending Fortunato’s life. It is this value that must be analyzed in order to understand the mindset of Montresor and to justify his actions. Montresor is driven to take the life of Fortunato by an obligatory sense of family devotion, revealing a similar justification for killing complimentary to a patriot fighting for their country.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to James Rachels, in his essay “The Morality of Euthanasia,” the American Medical Association’s Conventional Doctrine in Euthanasia is false. The Conventional Doctrine states that there are certain situations in which letting someone die or passive euthanasia is morally permissible, but killing a patient or active euthanasia is not. For instance, in many circumstances a doctor can withhold treatment and will do nothing wrong if the patient were to die, but if the doctor were to provoke the death of the patient then it would be morally wrong. Rachels’ final goal is not to take a stand on the rightness or wrongness of euthanasia but instead show that if passive euthanasia is morally permissible then active euthanasia is also morally permissible. (define euthanasia)…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of the War Convention is to establish the duties of the persons engaged in the act of aggression. Michael Walzer defined the War Convention as the articulated norms, customs, professional codes, precepts, religious, philosophical principles and reciprocal arrangements that shape our judgement of military conduct. Thus, the War Convention may be interpreted as the multitude of non-binding moral criteria by which the justice of actions within the prosecution of conflict may be judged. The concern is with jus in bello, justice in war, and not jus ad bellum, which regards the just initiation of war. The distinction between the justice of war and the just prosecution of war is significant for the purpose of this essay, for it is the…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays