Preview

War on Iraq- Stillman

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War on Iraq- Stillman
“The Decision to go to war with Iraq” (Pfiffner, 2009) is an analysis of the factors that led G. W. Bush and his administration to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein and his government. Pfiffner provides a short historic background explaining the reasons this decision was made. According to his essay these reasons relate closely to the G. H. W. Bush administration that in the 1990s decided against invading Iraq and overthrowing Hussein. Public officers, who were assigned in critical positions during the G. W. Bush administration, such as Rumsfield, Wolfowitz and Perle, were pushing a war agenda convinced that Iraq posed a major threat to the United States, previously during the Clinton administration (Pfiffner, 2009). Undoubtedly, trying to analyze this decision is a very difficult task. Complicating this task are several factors, including the individuals and agencies involved in the decision, which now is seen as erroneous and a failure of public administration. In the decision making the president, appointed officials and organizations such as the CIA were involved. The 9/11 terrorists attacks played a major role in the president’s decision to go to war with Iraq. It seems that after that incident G. W. Bush changed his mind and started believing that war was inevitable (Pfiffner, 2009). A good starting point would be to analyze the individuals involved that influenced the President and his decisions. There is no doubt that the appointed officials were given specific positions based on merit. They were experts in their discipline, had skill and experience. It is very interesting to observe that most of them fit perfectly the ideal public official based on the New Deal Era Theory. Like in the 1930s these officials were experienced, industry trained and had a very good university education (Morgan et al., 2008). The scientific and technical expertise, which is the base of the merit system, was present. This notion was evident and it did


References: Morgan Douglas F., Green, Richard, Shinn, Craig W., and Robinson, Kent S. 2008: Foundations of Public Service, Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe Stillman, Richard J. 2010. Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, 9th Ed., Boston Wadsworth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    F Williams MKTG340 U2IP

    • 1434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pfiffner, J. P. (1999). The public service ethic in the new public personnel systems. Public…

    • 1434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former President George Bush used a lot of historical fact to justify his argument of invading Iraq. He said things such as: Iraq’s technological abilities, their weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam Hussein’s previous threats against the US. He sounds like he has significant evidence to back up his speech, until he said “Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to developing a nuclear weapon. Well, we don’t know exactly…” This statement only disapproved his previous statements.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President George Bush’s letter to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is, at least on the surface, a persuasive piece intended to convince the Iraqi leader to withdraw his forces from occupied Kuwait before war breaks out. Upon closer reading, however, the critical reader will see that Bush’s "argument" is, in fact, not much of a rational argument (let alone a convincing one), which is odd in that Bush himself repeatedly points out that much is at stake. The superficiality of the American President’s argument leads one to seek out other more likely purposes.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fahrenheit 451

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matusek, Matt. “Purpose of Iraq war murky to Americans.” 17 September 2004. The Online Rocket. 1 April 2008.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He began a campaign to heal the nation after the tragedy, but moved toward a controversial campaign to garner public support for the War on Terror (Greenstein). Soon after his accusation that Iraq possessed “weapons of mass destruction” was questioned, the war took a polarizing effect (Greenstein). Despite the finding that there existed no legitimate reason for the invasion of Iraq, Republicans stubbornly reinforced their support for the president’s war actions. Meanwhile, many Democrats who initially…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dixie Chicks

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Somehow over the course of the next year and a half, Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein became the target of President George W. Bush and administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. According to some reports, these officials made hundreds of false statements following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq and the myth of “weapons of mass destruction” in order to justify launching an attack of Iraq on March 20, 2003.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Billie

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Oweiss, Ibrahim M., (2007) “Why did the United States fail in its War on Iraq?”…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president can use military power as he decides is essential and proper to shield national security and authorize all relevant United Nations Security chamber resolutions to use force. Before starting war, under obligations Bush had to make accessible to Congress his assurance of circumstances. Indeed, under requirements he had to prove that Iraq was infringing upon UN resolutions by yet being in control of weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that Iraq was behind the 9-11 assaults. Invading Iraq started before any peaceful resolutions, an alliance between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and a threat of weapons of mass destruction was proven. In his book, Record emphasizes how the 9/11 Commission reported in 2005 that while there may have been contacts between al Qaeda and the Baathist administration, have seen no proof that these ever formed into a community relationship; nor have we seen confirmation showing that Iraq participated with al Qaeda in creating or completing assaults against the United States” (51). Furthermore, Hussein allowed UN auditors to have access to suspected weapons areas. They reported that there was no proof or conceivable sign of an atomic weapons program in Iraq. Record concludes, Iraq was a choice not because it was a convincing security threat but…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Aftermath

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the speech George W. Bush made, “Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People, Sept. 20, 2001,” he began to try to rationalize and justify his decision to prepare for war by stating, “Tonight we are a country awakened to danger and called to defend freedom. Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution. Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.” When people start to panic and fear what is going to happen next, they tend to look up to higher authority, such as the government, and George W. Bush saw this happening and…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision to Invade Iraq

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our decision to invade Iraq was just. How the idea was sold to the American public was not, this in my opinion was the administrations greatest fault. There is no doubt that Iraq posed a significant threat to our nation and others and that its leader needed to be ousted. Whether the preemptive decision to invade was based on the belief that they possessed WMD is, in my opinion, inconsequential. Ethically, we know that utilitarians would evaluate the…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 2003 Iraq War lasted less than three weeks. It began in the early morning hours of March 20, when American missiles struck Baghdad. By April 9, U.S. forces had advanced into Baghdad. By April 15 Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had vanished, and U.S. and allied officials pronounced the end of major combat operations. Although the war itself was short, arguments over whether it was justified had been made for months and years prior to the attack, and still continue today. Going to war in Iraq was not justified on many levels.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In March of 2003 the United States of America invaded the Middle Eastern nation of Iraq. Under many pretenses, the stage was being set for this invasion, one reason calling for the invasion was that Bush administration and its officials assured the world that the Hussein regime was producing weapons of mass destruction or WMD’s, which would pose a huge security threat to all the nations around the world. Another being the fact that Hussein supported the group responsible for the attacks on our country on September 11th 2001, which angered plenty of Americans and seemingly justified violence to be used. And also the fact that Hussein needed to be removed from power as he was a brutal dictator who was committing egregious acts of violence against his own people. Therefore a humanitarian intervention would be called for using militaristic means. The administration under President Bush pushed the idea on the American people and the world that Iraq would be a better place without Hussein in control, also making the world a safer place. This war has cost the lives of approximately 600,000 Iraqis and 3,163 American soldiers, not to mention other soldiers from other nations involved in the conflict. The actions leading up to the subsequent invasion and occupation affected Iraq negatively and caused consequences that harmed all of Iraqi society, mainly innocent people. The way the world dealt with Saddam Hussein wasn’t proper nor in the best interests going forward for the Iraqi people and the citizens of the world based on many factors.…

    • 4361 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iraq War Essay Example

    • 4991 Words
    • 20 Pages

    You all have heard about this little thing called the Iraq War, Right? Well around these parts it’s kind of a big deal, and in these “parts” being the good old United States of America! Everyone should already know that it takes two to tango, and that’s no different from a war; there is always some cause or event has to happen for the effect of a war to take place. Well the justification for the invasion of Iraq is unclear. Yes a big part of the invasion was due to the 9/11 bombings, but was that all? The Bush Administration say they invaded Iraq to “Disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, end Saddam Hussein’s support for terrorism and to free the Iraqi people.”But is that really what they were trying to do? Or were they just trying to take oil from Iraq and the Iraqi people. There may be many reasons, some unclear, some very clear, and some hidden from the public. But what is certain is the Invasion of Iraq didn’t stop after the three week siege of Baghdad, it snowballed into a huge ten year “conflict” that still continues to this day, and has spread out of the Iraq borders.…

    • 4991 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iraq

    • 11636 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Jane K. Cramer and A. Trevor Thrall Author Info: A. Trevor Thrall (corresponding author) Assistant Professor Department of Social Sciences and Master of Public Policy Program University of Michigan – Dearborn 4910 Evergreen Rd Dearborn, MI 48128 313-593-5282 atthrall@umich.edu Jane K. Cramer Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1284 (541) 346-4626 jkcramer@uoregon.edu Abstract The years since the invasion of Iraq have undermined the administration’s stated rationales for war. A majority of Americans believes the administration intentionally misled the public about Iraq. Among foreign policy scholars the question arises repeatedly: Why did the U.S. invade Iraq? Did the administration go to war based on an overly aggressive reading of the evidence? If so, why? Or did the administration go to war for unstated reasons that go beyond Iraq such as oil, Israel, and geopolitics? The central purpose of this paper is to spur and inform debate by surveying and organizing the recent thinking of foreign policy and international relations experts about why the U.S. invaded Iraq. The results reveal areas of surprising agreement about the influence of neoconservative ideology as well as lively debates about which factors and which actors played the most decisive roles in the decision to go to war.…

    • 11636 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays