Preview

Warrantless Search

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1164 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Warrantless Search
Memorandum
TO: Judge Pearson
FROM: Charles Winfield
RE: Joe Green case – Larceny and Marijuana and Cocaine Possession Prosecution
DATE: July 26, 2012

Brief Summary
Joe Green was arrested and charged with larceny and possession of cocaine and marijuana. Green allegedly stole the backpack at a movie theater where he was in attendance, seated next to the backpack's owner, Danny Hall, who had placed the backpack under his seat. Hall noticed his backpack was gone upon seeing the man next to him quickly and abruptly leave the theater.

Question Presented
Is the warrantless search of Joe Green, who was arrested for larceny and drug possession after being detained by police on the lookout for someone who stole a backpack and matching the description of someone wearing a light red shirt, black pants and white sneakers, legal?

Short Answer
Yes. Mr. Green fit the description of a current suspect for whom a lookout was announced. He was noticed by the police and then detained. He was frisked by the arresting officer. Searches are deemed reasonable depending on the totality of circumstance when supported by probable cause, warrants or exigent circumstances. The victim's backpack was in plain view in the vehicle. The warrantless search incident to the arrest was valid.

Rule of Law – Cases for the Basis of Analysis
In NY v. Belton 453 US 454 (1981), the Supreme Court held that a lawful custodial arrest based on probable cause justifies a search without a warrant of the person arrested and the passenger compartment.

In Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) the Supreme Court held that police may search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to a recent occupant's arrest (and therefore without a warrant) only if it is reasonable to believe that the arrestee might access the vehicle at the time of the search or that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.

In Thornton v. United States, 541 U.S. 615 (2004), the Supreme Court held that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can police stop a person without probable cause? Can police search a person stopped without probable cause?…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002, Lemon Montrea Johnson was the passenger in the backseat of a car stopped for a traffic violation. Johnson was charged with; inter alia, possession of drugs and possession of a weapon by a felon. These items were discovered during a protective pat-down search of Johnson. Johnson was convicted by the trial court. Johnson argued that his conviction should be overturned because the trial court was in error by denying his motion to suppress the evidence. He argued that he had been unlawfully “seized” because being a passenger in a vehicle does not automatically constitute “seizure.” He furthered argued that even if he had been “seized,” that by the time Officer Trevizo searched him he was no longer “seized” as their conversation had become consensual. Furthermore, the evidence should not be considered because the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights and because the…

    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under what is known as the Plain View Doctrine is called a search-related plain view, referring to items that are identified by the responding officer who was authorized to specifically search for it. In this particular case, the officer was authorized to search for a white, 6’0 tall individual who was wearing a black baseball cap, black t-shirt, and jeans. Even though this description is vague, this individual was in the area of the crime, did match the description, and acted merely suspicious in the officer’s presence. This initially identification is where the detention had occurred in this particular case. The plain view doctrine also states that an officer has the ability to make a warrantless seizure of an object that is involved in a crime if the officer can identify the object in plain view (Terry v. Ohio,…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant's arrest if it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 at 351.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant (2009) SCOTUS rule held that the Belton rule was revised as the justices stated that it did not give authority for the police officers to search an arrestee’s vehicle if the occupant had been arrested and therefore could not access the interior of the car. This implies that the police should only search the arrestee and places that could be reached. Gant could no longer reach the interior of his car, and there was no reasonable ground to suppose that a search would produce evidence to support the offense of driving on a suspended license. Gant v. Arizona established that a search of a vehicle after an arrest is permissible when the arrestee is not confined, and the passenger compartment is within their immediate reach.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a search warrant is issued on the grounds of proving someone to be a part of gang activity, is it logical to be able to search their personal items such as a phone?…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution, protecting them against unreasonable search and seizures. The court rejected the defenses opinion, in that the weapons were seized due to a lawful search incident to arrest. The motion to suppress was denied because the court found that the officer had cause to believe the men were acting suspiciously, the seizer and question was warranted and the officers own right to safety had the right the pat down the suspects’ outer clothing, believing that the suspects may be…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e. Court of Appeals found the search to be unconstitutional, concluding that after the occupants were arrested the vehicle and its contents were "safely within the exclusive custody and control of the police."…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police did not conduct a lawful search and seizure under the guidelines set forth in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that search and seizure can occur during an arrest warrant that is being carried out but the "the area within control" of the suspect. The area within control was eventually decided as being the reach of arms length from the suspect. This is a lawful act designed to prevent the suspect from engaging in dangerous behavior towards others and also for the protection of any evidence the suspect may attempt to destroy. The suspect was not at the dwelling when officers arrived therefore no search and seizure should have taken place. Police officers were notified that the suspect was not present upon arrival and entry of the home. There were no reasonable causes for police to suspect that items dangerous to themselves were inside the home.…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, contemporaneousness and inventory searches "if a government agent has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant" because "in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, driver and contraband or evidence could be long gone" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 case of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One does not expect to leave their house and have a stranger barge into their home and rummage through their belongings. This is the situation that Petitioner David Fallsbauer found himself in with not a stranger, but a highly esteemed officer of the law, whom unreasonably dissected his possessions. Under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, citizens are protected against the unbridled and unreasonable searches and seizures. One exception is through consent to the search. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 (9th Cir. 1973). Petitioner David Fallsbauer can demonstrate through established case law that the consent his mother gave was ambiguous. Because his mother’s consent was ambiguous, the consent was not…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After detective Townsend decided that that Roussells current address was the Magnolia apts he decided to conduct a probation search. While searching the apartment they found a hand gun. After searching the residents detective Townsend found out from Kima Downey that Roussell had moved out about three months earlier, The detective also found out that Downey was a convicted felon, they arrested him for possession of the gun. Downey motioned to suppress the weapon but it was denied and he pled guilty.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Del Carmen, R. V. (2010). Criminal procedure: Law and practice. (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First let’s ask what does Stop and frisk actually mean legally? “It’s the situation in which a police officer who is suspicious of an individual detains the person and runs his hands lightly over the suspect's outer garments to determine if the person is carrying a concealed weapon.”…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, if there was a probable cause to search that person because they were somehow involved, or an eyewitness identified their involvement while the crime was happening, a police officer could search them. If law enforcement came upon a scene where a crime was in progress, they could enter and search a location or person within the location of the crime in progress without violating that person’s fourth amendment rights.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays