Preview

Was the American Civil War Inevitable?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the American Civil War Inevitable?
Was the American civil war inevitable?

The civil war was inevitable, only however, after one key event; the cotton gin made the civil war inevitable. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 was the key element which enabled the south to have sufficient vested interest in their traditional lifestyle in order to feel the need to defend it at all costs even from their Northern countrymen. The core argument of this essay centres around the evidence which clearly defines their being in existence two ‘nations' with in America constantly in opposition to each other. Therefore the growth of sectionalism and the events which led up to the conflict made war an inevitable outcome of the hostilities which had arisen from the to ideologically different factions which grew in the United States. Firstly this essay will identify the economic factors which made the civil war an inevitable event with reference to the singular factor that could have averted the need for the conflict. Second it will identify the political measures which were dictated by the sectional economic interests. The third section of this essay will introduce the ideological incompatibility between north and south which added fuel to the fire of sectionalism. The fourth section will discus the underlining social conflict which made inevitable not only the civil war but also a "second American revolution". The final section will deal with the counter arguments which advocate the alleged ‘repressible' nature of the War Between the States.

Economic Victory was thought to have been in the hands of the modern north that saw with the end of the slave trade and the unproductive problems of slavery, the decline of the southern economy. If the economy had continued to decline then the slave labour would have surely died out and the north would have a bloodless victory on their hands. However with the invention of Eli Witney's cotton gin in {date} slavery was born again and with ruthless further the south clung on to



Bibliography: Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (1988) By James M Ordeal by fire volume one the coming of war (1992) By James M The Emergence of Lincoln, Vol.II (1950) By Allan Nevins Conflict & Consensus in American History 9th edition vol. 1 (1998) By Allen F The rise of American civilization, vol.II (1927) By Charles and Marry Beard Interpretations of American history patterns and perspectives vol.1.To 1877 6th Ed. (1987) By Gerald N The Secessionist impulse: Alabama and Mississippi in 1860 (1974) By Barney, William L

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil war in America was inevitable from the beginning. A country can not partake in slavery without an uproar. Tensions were high between the north and the south already because of their different ways of life. The north focused on mass production whereas the south’s biggest trade was agriculture. Slavery allowed the south to prosper, their whole economy was based off of it. Though change was inevitable two documents that sped up the war process were the Fugitive Slave Act and Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States encountered many difficulties prior to the Civil War. As the years went through, it was clear that the Constitution’s laws would not solve many of the issues left on the decisions of the heads of the state. Constitutional amendments were subjected to free interpretation and manipulation and several difficulties remained to be solved, making the threat of a war real and imminent. The Civil War of 1861 became, in fact, a terrible reality, due to religious issues and sectional power struggles.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An Unavoidable Bloodshed The civil war produced the highest death toll in any American war estimated to be an appalling 620,000 soldiers (Williams). The lives lost and atrocities committed were an inevitable part of a country bound for war due to dissonance among the people. With the invention of Eli Whitney’s cotton gin in the 1790s the South’s economic path of slavery was set in stone. The North, an industrial power house, conflicted with the South’s ideals for an economy based on slave work.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the former New York Senator William Seward, the American Civil War arose as a consequence of irrepressible conflict between opposing forces. He believed that had there been a compromise between these forces then the nation could have avoided the war. The paper agrees with the senator's views and takes the perceptive that these opposing forces and not just the failure to compromise by politicians were the origins of the war. Politicians could only have achieved so much, but these opposing forces held a stronger bargaining power than the politicians. The paper discusses these forces and concludes by offering a compromise that could have forestalled the war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil War, was fought from 1861 to 1865. It was caused by the disagreement over the future of slavery between the industrialized North and the agrarian South. That dispute led to secession. The North’s initial political objective was clear: to restore the Union. Later, emancipation, or freeing the slaves, became another objective. The Confederacy (South) wanted its independence. The Secession led to the Civil War. The victory of Union in the Civil War was a product of many factors. Yet three most notable ones are: the “simultaneous pressure” of the North, offensive-defensive strategy of the South, and the crucial victory of the North in the Battle of the Antietam.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was an inevitability due to several factors creating a divide between the Northern and Southern States. The primary disagreement between the North and South was slavery. Slavery had become an essential cog in the Southern economic machine. Due to the North’s distaste for slavery, these conflicting viewpoints would not have remained at peace for long. Another factor which caused the inevitable road to war was the events in Kansas and Missouri. Better known as “Bleeding Kansas,” these skirmishes by pro-slavery southerners and abolitionists portrayed the passion behind these opposing beliefs. Both sides were willing to spill their own blood for their cause. The final inevitability deals with the Cotton Kingdom. Since the invention of the Gin, cotton had become a lucrative product for plantation owners. The selling of cotton had become such a large part of the Southern economy that opposition from the North regarding enslaved workers caused increased tensions between both sides. The differences between the North and South were too great for peace between them to last. In addition, Slavery was too deeply rooted in Southern economics and values that it could not be removed without…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cotton Gin Effects

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    More slaves were needed to keep producing cotton, which led to an increase in slavery. By 1860 one in three Southerners was a slave. Because of the cotton gin, slaves now were forced to work in a more regimented environment and cover larger plantations while working for long periods of time. The founding fathers thought that slavery was going to die eventually, but they were wrong. The Cotton Gin renewed slavery, leading the south to defend slavery. The North did not feel the same, as a result, the Civil War…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the American government started passing unfavorable bills regarding certain territories in America, hostilities increased significantly, destroying the only aspiration of avoiding a civil war. Due to plentiful resources and population growth, the North transformed into a metropolitan area with advanced technology and successful ventures. It was also able to increase its territory due to the Ordinance of 1784, which allowed it to “incorporate new north-western states into its region,” and “achieve a larger population of residents.” The North’s increase in territory caused the South to envy its prosperity, increasing tensions that would contribute to the Civil War. Similar to how the Ordinance of 1784 escalated tensions in the South, the Wilmot Proviso, intended to eradicate slavery, drew an uproar from both the North and the South. Henry Clay, a politician opposing slavery, defied the expectations of both the North and the South by instructing the North to refrain from “demanding the terms” of the Wilmot Proviso and the South “against considering secession.” Since the South possessed a worse economy than the North, Clay had asserted that by eradicating slavery in the South, it would wage war just to preserve its economy. Clay’s warning revealed that the government advocated the North as opposed to the South, and that it was incapable of passing sufficient legislation. The South discovered the government’s bias towards the North and started the process to secede from the Union in order to achieve autonomy and create an honest…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henretta, J.A., Edwards, Rebecca, Self, O. America: A Concise History, Volume One: To 1877, 5th Edition. Bedford/St. Martin 's, 01/2012. VitalBook file.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government may have tried to get the North and the South to come to a compromise on their differences during the 1800’s, but the Civil War was a completely inevitable event. One of the most notable differences between the North and the South was their stances on who should have more power in government. Northerners believed that federal government should be the one to decide whether slavery was to be abolished or not. The South disagreed since they felt that states should be independent, and have the right to make big decisions (like having slavery) without interference from the federal government. Their strong feelings were based on the fact that agriculture was what the Southerners depended for income and use of slave labor kept the…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was fought between the Northern and Southern states of of America. Was the Civil War inevitable? It was a conflict bound to happen due to the differences between the North and South’s views on slavery, society, and politics. The South wanted their independence and freedom from the North, while the North wanted unity.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The civil war was inevitable in the 1850s and by two sides that did not agree with each other on a lot of stuff but the most important one was slavery, which was Northern and southern states that could not agree with each other .”The south believed that they couldn't keep up with the Northern economy without the force of slavery. Some people in the North believed that slavery was not fair and also gave the South an unfair economic advantage”(prezi).This is saying that the south thinks they can't live without slavery and the north thinks it is unfair. The point where there was no turning back was in 1860 when Abraham Lincoln was elected. ”publicly announced his plans of abolishing slavery, it was widely protested against in the Southern states.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I am going to clarify why the civil war started. A civil war is a conflict fought between inhabitants of the same country. In this case the two sides that fought against each other in England were King Charles I’s side and Parliament’s side. The main reasons for going to war were parts of these three main topics: Money, Religion and Power. There were many reasons for the civil war, some of the proceedings of 1642 were the grand remonstrates made by parliaments for more power, I will further explicate this later in the essay. I am also going to explain the long - term causes and the short - term causes also known as the triggers.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics