Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Was the Constitution Written to Be a Self Consciously Landmark Document or Was It Simply a Compilation of Compromises?

Good Essays
1297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the Constitution Written to Be a Self Consciously Landmark Document or Was It Simply a Compilation of Compromises?
In the United States, since roughly 1800, there have been two majorpolitical parties. For the last 150 years or so, these two parties have been the Democrat and Republican parties. This is in deep contrast to many other democratic nations, who often have as many as ten significant parties. Many people wonder why the United States has only two parties and why it is so difficult for a third or a fourth party to make any significant gains and become a noteworthy player on the national political scene. The reasons are many and varied.

Historical Foundations

The first two opposing groups in U.S. political history were theFederalists and the Anti-Federalists. In the early years of our nation, the Federalists dominated in power, because they were essentially the "money" party; they represented the merchants and the manufacturers, whereas the Anti-Federalists (who would gradually become known as the Democratic Republicans, and eventually as just the Democrats) represented the artisans and the farmers.

Eventually, these two parties evolved into representing two distinct sets of interests. The Democrats came to represent the agriculturaland frontier interests in the South and West, while the Federalists (who eventually evolved into the Republican party) supported commercial interests in the East. In other words, certain parts of the country voted almost exclusively for one party, and the two parties held ideologies that best supported their particular section. This was known as sectional politics, and the idea lasted well into the 20th century.

Given their already established power, the two party system managed to perpetuate itself onto a national level, this time making its power on the idea of class politics, where traditionally the Republican Partyrepresents the more financially affluent and the Democratic Partyrepresents the working class and the poor. In other words, the two parties have always benefited by exploiting geographic and financialdivisions.

Self Perpetuation

Children often adopt the political party of their parents. Given that throughout history, the two parties managed to make themselves dominant through sectional and class politics, their power is self-perpetuating through the fact that many children simply inherit the political party of their parents, guaranteeing the two major parties a built-in voting bloc with each generation.

After the new United States Congress completed its first task of creating a Bill of Rights, it turned its attention to the issue of financing the new government. President George Washington appointed Alexander Hamilton as the Treasury Secretary, and Hamilton took it upon himself to develop an economic structure for the United States that would give the public confidence in the government’s financial affairs.

The American Two-Party System

The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country.
Parties in Other Democracies

Most democratic countries have more than two parties. In Israel, for example, twelve parties or party alliances held seats in the seventeenth Knesset. Japan has several major parties, including the Liberal Democratic Party, the Democratic Party of Japan, the New Komeito, and the Japanese Communist Party.

The Electoral System

In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a winner-take-all systembecause there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes.
The United States also has mostly single-member districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use multiple-member districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature.

The Electoral College

The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system because in all but two states, whoever wins the most popular votes wins all of the state’s electoral votes in the presidential election. The electoral rules favor a two-party system, and minor parties have a very difficult time competing in such a system. Even successful third-party candidates often fail to get a single electoral vote.

Example: In the 1992 presidential election, independent candidate H. Ross Perot received nearly 19 percent of the popular vote, but he did not get a single electoral vote. Other recent third-party candidates—including John Anderson in 1980, Perot again in 1996, and Ralph Nader in 2000—also failed to win electoral votes. The last third-party candidate to win any electoral votes was George Wallace in 1968’s tumultuous election.

Advantages and Disadvantages

There are a few advantages of the American two-party system:

• Stability: Two-party systems are more stable than multiparty systems • Moderation: The two parties must appeal to the middle to win elections, so the parties tend to be moderate. • Ease: Voters have only to decide between two parties.

But there are also a few disadvantages to our system, including the following:

• Lack of choice: Both parties tend to be very similar, limiting voters’ options. • Less democratic: A percentage of people will always feel marginalized by the system.

The Early Republic: Federalists Versus Antifederalists (1792–1800)

The first political issue that divided American statesmen was the ratification of the Constitution. On one side were the Federalists, who wanted to ratify the Constitution in order to create a stronger national government; the Antifederalists, on the other side, feared that the Constitution would strip people of the liberties they had just won in the Revolutionary War. Although the Constitution was ratified, this early political division extended into the first decades of the republic. The Federalists allied themselves to Alexander Hamilton and President John Adams, while Thomas Jefferson rallied the Antifederalists, who had begun calling themselves the Democratic Republicans. Neither faction was a true party in the modern sense, though, because both lacked strong cohesion.

The Jacksonian Era: Democrats Versus Whigs (1824–1850)

The first modern political party was the Democratic Party, which formed in the wake of the highly contested presidential election of 1824, when Andrew Jackson won the popular vote but did not win a majority of electoral votes. The House of Representatives chose John Quincy Adams to be the next president. In response, Jackson’s supporters organized the Democratic Party to oppose the Adams Administration. The

Democrats rebounded in four years and elected Jackson to replace Adams in 1828. The Democrats were also the first major grassroots party, building support from the ground up. Those disparate politicians who opposed Jackson’s policies formed a temporary coalition known as the Whig Party.

The Antebellum Period: Democrats Versus Republicans (1850–1860)

Over the next few decades, slavery emerged as a hugely divisive issue, as pro-slavery forces fought abolitionists with increasing intensity. Neither the Whigs nor the Democrats could respond adequately to the new issue. As a result, both parties split in two along sectional lines.

The Republican Party formed in the late 1840s and early 1850s out of abolitionist Democrats and northern Whigs. The Democrats, on the other hand, now consisted primarily of Southerners and rural Westerners. In 1860, the Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln. Northern Democrats nominated Stephen Douglas, whereas Southern Democrats nominated John C. Breckenridge. Lincoln narrowly won the race with promises of maintaining the Union, but his election nevertheless prompted South Carolina and several other Southern states to secede.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    There are many reasons why America has only two major political parties. It could be the cause of the federal government. The major parties reflect its decentralized structure. Candidates are recruited at the state or local level and are responsive primarily to their own state or local constituencies. At the national level, they consist of local party representatives. This state local orientation affects the policy positions that parties take and the decisions that their elected officials make. What this really means is that we started off with a two party government and people in these parties came into power. Now that they attained the power they do not want to give it away so what the parties do is give their power to people that think just like them which would be other members in their party. On top of that it is so hard for a smaller party with no financial backing to even compete with the two monstrous parties.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting in the years 1801-1817 there was a separation in the United States. The Federalists and Dem-Rep parties were basically opposites of each other. The Republicans were usually seen as strict constructionists, who opposed the broad constructionism of both Jefferson and Madison who were Federalists. In both, Jefferson’s and Madison’s presidencies they highlighted Federalists ideals in their decisions, including Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territory.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author asserts that the problem with American government is not the party but is instead the system of voting that creates the parties. The author begins by first stating the main problem with the two party system mainly the lack of choice it provides for the public. The author then compares our system with its plurality rules with the European parliamentary system of proportional representation. The author also explains that in some areas one party dominates elections in that area so the public has no way of really affecting government policy because they are only presented with one choice. The author points to the old solid south, which was solidly controlled by democrats, as an example. The author believes our two party system forces voters to be pick the lesser of two evils. He supports this claim by pointing to the fact that the two parties can only ever present two sides of an issue and this leaves the rest of the possible choices out of the picture.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early stages of the United States, two political parties emerged disagreeing with each other of who should have the power and what kind of government the nation should be composed of. The Federalist party wanted a strong national government and was thought to have a loose interpretation of the Constitution through the Elastic Clause. Onthe other hand, the Jeffersonian Republican party maintained that the states should retain the power and thought that the Elastic clause allowed the national govt too much power. They were know as the strict constructionists. Although the Republicans maintained this characterization at the beginning, the two parties exchanged their roles with each other during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, either because of certain political and foreign circumstances or ironically to make sure that the other party loses its power.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    National Identity Dbq

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    This ongoing concept of national identity was contributed to by certain groups, or factions who envisioned specific governments, yet they were the opposites of one another. This led to the formation of the Federalist and Republican parties down the road. The Federalists wanted the government to be a nation-state with centralized authority and a complex commercial economy.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The claim that political parties are in decline first arose in the United States in the late 1960s and 70s. There are several factors unique to the situation of American political parties that emphasise he case for party decline. In particular, the vast scale of party operations across the 52 states, the method used for candidate selection and the vast amounts of money used along the campaign. This essay will discuss whether the theory of party is outdated or not.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These parties were different in many ways. For example, the Whigs were a party for modernization and the Democrats were a party for American tradition. Democrats also were against banks and corporations while the Whigs favored using federal funds to improve the country. The Democrats wanted to expand the country as quickly as possible by acquiring land through war or purchase. The Whigs on the other hand strongly opposed war and wanted a gradual gathering of land. The Whigs wanted internal growth while the Democrats wanted external growth. The Democrats wanted a more agrarian and rural America that focused on farming mainly. While the Whigs supported American industry, urban growth and free labor. The Whigs were mostly backed by Northerners who wanted industrialization, urbanization, and federal rights. That means that the Democrats were backed mainly by the Southerners who wanted agriculture, slavery, states' rights, and territorial expansion.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patterson (2016) presents the idea that when a third party system arises in the United States it is short lived, mainly due to the election method that is used in America known as the plurality system, also known as “The winner takes all” (p. 226). Additionally, most third parties exhaust their funding before getting their name on the ballot. Furthermore, it has been proposed that one or both of the major parties will absorb the issues proposed by the third party causing its popularity to diminish. In this manner the existence of the third party gradually…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two Party System

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States has maintained the two-party system. According to Christine Barbour and Gerald C. Wright, “Throughout most of our history, in fact, the Democrats and the Republicans have been the only parties with a viable chance of winning the vast majority of elective offices”(Keeping the Republic, 2011)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Two-Party System

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By definition, “a two-party system is a political system in which two strong and established parties compete for political offices” (Sidlow & Henschen p.146). The Democrats and the Republicans make up our two party system. Some may wonder why the United States has only Democrats and Republicans as their political parties and if there is an opportunity for other parties. There are many factors that are considered relevant in the conjunction of the existence of the two-party system. Likewise, there are some major consequences of having a two-party system.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Party Elections

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Political parties are the driving force behind elections in the United States. Since the Reconstruction, no third-party candidate has even been close in winning the Presidential Race (Schattschneider 186). Also since then, only 163 third-party candidates have been elected to government office without being affiliated to the two major parties( Schattschneider 189).George Washington was the only man to be President as a true independent. Many people may look at this and think that if Washington did this, maybe the system should be changed. But the fact is unless the system is changed, the United States will most likely always be controlled by only two parties.…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the need for competition between majorities within a democracy, the party system can be seen as a strong component of American democracy, complimenting the necessity of having adequate representation. This is why it seems ironic how the founders of The Constitution were so against parties and factions. The importance that representation has in American politics cannot be stated enough because of the importance in the rule by the people. The formation of two parties created more involvement by the people in the process of politics by allowing them to organize and effectively express their views in a domain that was large enough to be influential. Jefferson and Madison realized that without parties they would not be able to muster up enough supporters and spur interests enough to defeat the Federalist Party (Dahl 30). Political parties also allow for people to be more represented, since they can align with a party that fits with their interest and vote accordingly. Thus, political parties breed competition between ideologies within the U.S., and this competition is extremely healthy for our…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    my paper that i love

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two main parties here in the United States are the Democrats and the Republicans. At every level, one of these two parties dominates the voting. The end result would be all or nearly all elected offices would consist of members from one of the two major parties. Usually, after the elections, offices are held by either the Democratic or Republican party.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays