Preview

Was the Schlieffen Plan Foredoomed to Failure?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the Schlieffen Plan Foredoomed to Failure?
Was the Schlieffen Plan Foredoomed to Failure? To avoid the French fortress system, the Germans had developed a plan to surround Paris in a flanking maneuver to quickly conquer France. The plan was expected to be carried out in only 40 days, however, many important steps were not taken which cost the Germans the vital element of haste. The Schlieffen plan was not foredoomed to failure, yet it it did fail due to three factors: the reduction to the right wing on the Western Front, the choice to avoid the path through Holland, and the poor coordination and regulation of the German armies. Alfred von Schlieffen built this plan around the inevitable outcome of a two front war. It was inevitablele that Germany was going to have to face Russia and France. Although Russia had the weaker army, her vast geography posed many issues; it was France that was decided to be the first country to invade. Schlieffen planned for a quick victory on the Western Front which would allow the armies to travel back across Germany to meet Russia at the Eastern Front. He also believed that France was the most decisive factor in the war and defeating them quickly would deter their allies from joining. The German forces had to surround Paris and conquer France before the Russians could mobilize her army. The German Chief of Staff knew that with the advanced rail systems of Germany this transition of armies was possible. Schlieffen predicted that it would take Russia 6 weeks to mobilize. However, Russia prepared her armies much faster, which resulted in attention being shifted from the west to the east. One can argue that the Schlieffen plan was doomed from conception rather than poor execution because of Count Schlieffen’s underestimations. However, even with these miscalculations, the plan could have worked with proper execution. In 1906, Schlieffen had retired and Helmuth von Moltke was appointed as Chief of General Staff. Moltke was never a confident leader, in fact, he had doubts


Cited: Lyons, Miachael J. World War 1: A Short History. Second ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000. Print. Duffy, Michael. "Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. Duffy, Michael. "Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. Amin, A. H. "The Relationship of Organisation to Doctrine and Conduct of War." The Relationship of Organisation to Doctrine and Conduct of War. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Apr. 2013. Wright, Andrew. "Section 117." Section 117 RSS. N.p., 21 Mar. 2011. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. Duffy, Miachel. "Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. Duffy, Michael. "Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. Goddl, John. "Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 12 Apr. 2013. Scheck, Raffael. "Firstworldwar.com." First World War.com. N.p., 22 Aug. 2009. Web. 11 Apr. 2013.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Syllabus Nootes1
    • 4241 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Ww1 Syllabus Nootes1

    - The Schlieffen Plan was Germany’s pre-war (1906) strategy in invading France in the event of an outbreak of war – aggressive and needed speed and surprise…

    • 4241 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern History WW1 HSC
    • 3582 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Modern History WW1 HSC

    The failure of the Schlieffen Plan – Russia mobilized faster than expected, forcing Germany to redirect some troops from France. The resistance of Belgium meant that the Germans were unable to pass through. Britain quickly entered the war in support of Belgium and sending the BEF. Germany experienced supply problems and failed to realise that once off the railways, the speed of the army was determined by foot, making the deadline of 42 days unrealistic and inflexible. Their advance was delayed, allowing France to regroup with the BEF to halt German advance.…

    • 3582 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Should The United States Remain Neutral During World War II?
    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should The United States Remain Neutral During World War II?

    Their centralized command system caused a very slow response time during the invasion of Normandy which enabled Allied forces to move ahead despite their own issues. This central control continued to hurt Germany because Hitler would not commit further reserve forces to the battle until it was too late. Germany’s large issue of distrust inside of the political system caused the high command to believe their own intelligence services and therefore did not heed their warning that Normandy would not be a diversion but in fact the main assault. Allied forces proved resilient and innovative as they continued to overcome the metaphorical obstacles that stood in their way.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent were the decisions made by Germany's leaders responsible for the outbreak of the First World War?
    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent were the decisions made by Germany's leaders responsible for the outbreak of the First World War?

    Mark Hewitson argument that " German army and the government pushed for war before 1914 " is reasonable and puts the blame on the German leaders, this view is also supported by ficher who said that Germany was making plans for annexation before the July crisis which suggest that Germany hoped to quickly win the war. It is also supported by the Council meeting in 1912 which held that it was Germany's consious decision to wage war for its own gain. This view is supported by Porter and Armour ( source 2), they say " Bethmann Hollweg government deliberatly provoked a diplomatic crisis which it knew might lead to war." This strongly suggest that German leaders were actually responsible for the outbreak and the statement might be true, because if Hollweg knew that the war would be a certain victory, he would certainly be very pro-war, this due to him carrying about German wellfare which can be seen through certain reforms he passed, such as the 1911 imperial insurence code. Norman ( Source 3) does not fully accept the argument that the…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Battle Of Somme Outline Essay
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Battle Of Somme Outline Essay

    Thesis: The Battle of Somme the bloodiest battle of WWI because they had insufficient weaponry, poor war tactics, and constantly underestimating the enemy.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Was There Stalemate on the Western Front Between Germany and Franc
    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Why Was There Stalemate on the Western Front Between Germany and Franc

    As a result of alteration to the Schlieffen Plan, the complete failure of the French…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Allies Lose Ww2
    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did The Allies Lose Ww2

    “The Third Reich received important supplies of food and minerals from the USSR” (Mawdsley 112). This meant that when they invaded, they immediately lost the USSR as a supplier, which would’ve meant that the Germans would start to be limited in their supplies, which meant that they would most likely have to ration their supplies out carefully. Now we look to see why the Germans had so much success in the Battle of France. One of the main reasons that the French failed was because they fought the war the same way they fought World War 1, with, as the textbook puts it, a “defensive strategy rather than an offensive one” (Mawdsley 96), which meant that their troops would be slower for defensive reasons as they were not meant to be used offensively, allowing for them to easily be outmaneuvered. Another reason could be the way that the French designed and used their tanks.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914
    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914

    The Schlieffen Plan was implemented by the German General Staff, who prepared German troops to attempt to attack France by advancing through neutral Belgium, before travelling southwards to encircle Paris. This plan was inflexible and unpredictable, and was based on assumptions such as slow six week full Russian mobilisation, and that by then, France would be neutralised. Because an attack on Russia was the main objective at the time, Germany committed a larger amount of troops to the East in Russia, rather than in the West to execute the Schlieffen Plan. As a result, fewer troops were deployed in the West, leading to a failure of the offensive on France.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Mombauer And Foley
    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing Mombauer And Foley

    Another vital aspect of this historical debate is criticisms of the source analysis and interpretation of the historians involved. Mombauer and Foley believe Zuber’s disregard for the diplomatic background of Schlieffen and Motlke’s contexts weakens his claim’s credibility. Since Zuber only focuses on the military aspects, he misses much political evolution that may have led to an idea like the Schlieffen Plan being born. However, both Mombauer and Foley are shown to have ulterior motives in their dismissal of Zuber’s thesis. Mombauer’s criticism of Zuber stems from her examination of the origins of WWI, and in this work she concentrates excessively on German policy as a cause of WWI, neglecting other countries’, notably France’s, actions.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 and Who Was to Blame
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ww1 and Who Was to Blame

    2: The German war plan.The Russians had a very large army, and an alliance with France, so the Germans felt they weren't strong enough to fight both at the same time.However, as Russia was so large and its transport infrastructure was underdeveloped compared to the other European powers, it would take 2 months for the Russian army to fully mobilize.The Germans therefore devised the Schlieffen Plan, which was a surprise attack on France through neutral Belgium.This plan was designed to outflank the French army and capture Paris…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stalemate on the Western Front
    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stalemate on the Western Front

    There are several reasons for stalemate on the Western Front by December 1914, which include numerous faults in the strategies and implementation of the Schlieffen Plan, tactical and strategic problems, problems in communications and the incapability of the commanders. There was also a changing in offensive to defensive, poor trench conditions, poor equipment and supplies, and also low morale amongst both armies. Faults in the strategies and implementation of the Schlieffen Plan were a major reason for the formation of a stalemate on the Western Front. The Schlieffen Plan was held up unexpectedly by strong Belgian resistance, taking the Germans two weeks to take Brussels. Instead of sweeping around in a wide arc and approaching Paris from the west, the Germans found themselves heading to Paris just east of the city. They got within 32 kilometers of Paris, as the French government retreated to Bordeaux, yet closer they got the slower they went. This was thanks to several problems, including poor supplies and equipment. In Source C German General von Kuhl blames the "new telephone systems were much too weak and were not sufficiently equipped with the new apparatus" for their failure.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The German Tactics Affect The Fall Of France?
    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The German Tactics Affect The Fall Of France?

    The French High Command have been heavily critised for their inefficiency during the siege of France. Again Kiesling highlights that “the army that mobilized for war in September 1939 lacked cohesion, training and leadership.” Major General RH Barry labels the allied command as “slow and unimaginative in thought”. Colonel A. Goutard attacks the French clinging to “outmoded tactics and of being incapable of adapting of the innovative tactics of the enemy”. He also suggests that the when French leadership that when new tactics and unexpected movements were used, French army leaders resigned themselves to defeat.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles: Establishing the Conditions of Peace with Germany
    • 2415 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles: Establishing the Conditions of Peace with Germany

    NSW Government. (n.d.). Modern History:World War and its aftermath. Retrieved October 1, 2011, from HSC Online: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/greatwar/pdf/g5cs2background.pdf…

    • 2415 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    America in World War 1
    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    America in World War 1

    In 1914 when war was declared in Europe, America adopted a policy of neutrality and isolation. When news of trench warfare and the horrors associated with it reached the shores of America, it confirmed to the government that they had made the right choice. Their approach had the full support of a majority of Americans, many of which could not believe that Europe, a civilized entity, could descend into the depths of carnage as depicted by trench warfare.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Account for the Reasons for the German Defeat in Wwi.
    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Account for the Reasons for the German Defeat in Wwi.

    One of the flaws to the German leadership during the war was that military decisions were often influenced by political factors and goals, which would inevitably lead to problems in their war plans. An example of this was when Russia surrendered to the Germans in 1917, Germans left 500,000 of their troops in Russia as an occupying force. This aggressive expansionism by Ludendorff proved to be a fatal mistake as had these troops been reallocated to the western front, they could have potentially succeeded in their Spring Offensive.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics