Preview

We Are Not Free By Wendell Berry Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
879 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
We Are Not Free By Wendell Berry Summary
Berry tried to tell us that the food we eat is neither healthy nor natural anymore. He gave his public these hints by saying the following; “There is, then, a politics of food that, like any politics, involves our freedom. We still remember that we cannot be free if our minds and voices are controlled by someone else. But we have neglected to understand that we cannot be free if our food and its sources are controlled by someone else” (Berry 7) and “Most urban shoppers would tell you that food is produced on farms. But most of them do not know what farms, or what kind of farms, or where the farms are, or what knowledge of skills is involved in farming.”(Berry 4) I believe everyone has different opinions and arguments but mine happens to disagree with Wendell Berry’s argument.
Wendell Berry argues that the farms are not even farms anymore and the foods we eat are GMOs. Yes, this might be true but I disagree with Berry in the “we are not free because the food we eat is being controlled by someone else.” first of all I think
…show more content…

Berry also said how we don’t know where the farms are from or what they do to the animals we eat or how badly they get treated but have we died? That’s the question. There hasn’t been a big amount of deaths per month but they add them up by year. And not every food company is like that, also as the years go by the population grows bigger and it gets harder to make a huge amount of food in just days so the easy way out is to feed them corn. Call me cruel but those animals will die eventually, we will die eventually so why are we worrying about the type of food we eat or feed to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have been a minor but relevant issue since they became popular. They exist almost everywhere in America, but countless people continue to debate whether they should remain. Andrew Pollack’s article “Genetically Engineered Crops Are Safe, Analysis Finds,” for instance, leans toward GMOs. In contrast, Danny Hakim’s “Doubts About the Promised Bounty of Genetically Modified Crops” gravitates against them. While exploring their perspectives of GMOs, the articles most prominently include an obvious audience, strong but contrasting uses of information, and various rhetorical appeals, all of which help demonstrate their purpose.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wendell Berry is the author of the essay called “The Loss of the Future” which was published over forty years ago and is still prevalent in issues today. “The Loss of the Future” deals with the issues human behavior in the world. Humans do not see the impact their behavior effects the world as a whole, nor do they want to be held accountable for it to change their ways. He expresses the downfall of topics such as power, idealism and the government. He also emphasizes the play on words used today such as ghettos where they are meant to be more than just the negative connotation put on them.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wendell Berry, the author of “The Pleasures of Eating”, claims that we, as a society, should know and care where our food actually comes from, to be able to realize that the food that reaches our tables has been through a ride that we may not necessarily like. He also encourages us to grow our own food and to buy our produce and fruits from a farmer’s market. I agree with the point that Berry is trying to get across. Making our own produce, fruits, meats, dairy, etc. is better because not only will we eat healthier and not be dependent on importing products but we will actually know what we are consuming. Sure making our own food is hard and it does take time, but there is no doubt that making it is better than faking it.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In Defense of Food” is a book written by Michael Pollan which was released in 2008. Pollan writes about the “Western Diet” and the dangers associated with it. He proposes a new answer to what we should and should not eat. He states that it comes down to seven simple words: Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants. Those are the words that he opens the book with, this is his basic recommendation. He states that the rest of the book is just a detailed elaboration of those words. The first half of the book is all about criticizing and deconstructing the “health disaster”, as Pollan calls it, of the “western diet”, as well as the philosophy of nurtitionism that surrounds it. The second half of the book focuses on solutions to this disaster and Pollan’s thoughts on the matter.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Pollan believes that people should have knowledge of foods from the ancient past. This valuable wisdom has been collected over thousands of years and can be used to improve present day diets. He states, “Modern Americans have lost the solution to the omnivore’s dilemma and today the problem is bigger than it has ever been. But it’s not an unsolvable problem. We need to recover the skills and knowledge people used to have” (104). Michael Pollan explains how learning about the history of food will result in food choices (such as eating locally-grown foods) which are safe and healthy.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Omnivore’s Dilemma, by Michael Pollan, attempts to figure out how such a simple question as, “What should we have for dinner?” (Pollan 1), turned out to be so complicated such that we need investigative journalists to tell us what is in our food. To do so, he went on a journey to follow all three food chains that sustain us today: the industrial, the organic, and the hunter-gatherer back to their origins. Although these journeys may have led to very different paths, there was one underlying theme that linked them all: the tension between logic of nature and industry. For every step industrialization takes, natural forces push it back to balance it out. Even so, industrialization has found a way to keep up with nature’s work by breaking through its cycle in order to thrive and profit. The work of industry is undeniably compelling. The Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) alone has made meat so cheap and abundant that most American families can afford to eat it every meal. Industry makes this happen by feeding cows and steers large amounts of cheap federally subsidized corn, which the cows never evolved to eat. The result of this poor diet is simply a hoard of sick cows due to the acidity the corn produces in their stomachs. To counteract this problem, industries turned to antibiotics. Medicines that were created to treat diseases are now a staple ingredient in a cows’ fodder, as an attempt to treat this acidic imbalance. Pollan explained the irony in this situation: “Here the drugs are plainly being used to treat sick animals, yet the animals probably wouldn’t be sick if not for the diet of grain we feed them.” (“The Feedlot: Making Meat” pg. 79) The power of industry lies in its ability to manipulate and twist the work of nature and to break closed cycles within nature. It has stripped the evolution of the rumen and its relationship with grass and has transformed cows into corn-fed machines. However, it doesn’t…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. This article claims that the Southern Manifesto claimed that the Supreme Court is a hazard to the constitutional government for that reason it claims that the Supreme Court was an effort through the “unprotected power” to circumvent established law. The original Constitution didn’t talk about the education, so it implied that education is only a matter for the states and not national jurisdiction. Lastly the Supreme Court took action that was causing chaos and loathing between the races in the Southern states, this was tearing apart society at the very seems of the nation then again the constitutional government was meant for support.…

    • 394 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    He provides little to no solid evidence to back up these straightforward yet discriminating assumptions which in turn weaken the credibility and persuasiveness Berry is trying to achieve. With the examples above, the condescending tone and excessive use of overgeneralization is apparent throughout. His explanations are way too broad and will be considered to be farfetched from the views of his intended audience. His constant use of criticism and overgeneralization mainly found in the middle of his essay diverts the intended audience away from his persuasion which in turn automatically diversifies his credibility as a writer. The constant use of overgeneralization overpowered the main point of “The Pleasures of Eating.”…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Berry begins with the proposition that eating is an agricultural act. He points out how humans don't think of food as an agricultural product, they don't even think of themselves as participants in agriculture. He then joins in the fact that we humans think of ourselves as consumers and if not than they're passive consumers. The condition of the passive consumer of food is not a democratic condition. One reason to eat responsibly is to live free. He then moves to industrial sex and how industrial eating has become a degraded, poor, and paltry thing like sex. Many people don't think about what they're eating, most of them do not know about the farming and where there food comes from, we don't know, where the farms are, how well it has been taken care of, or what knowledge of skills are involved in farming, they just buy because they see it and it attracts their eyes. He then goes on to express how apparently these urban people have little doubt that farms will continue to produce, but they do not know how or over what obstacles. This explanation helps many understand that the things we eat can harm us because we do not pay attention to the manufacturing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom is the state that you have power to act, speak and choose whatever you want. Everyone have the dream about being free and live without force in their lives, and also people have their rights to live without flexibility. Freedom is an essential act in people’s life because people who have not rights to speak or act are like a bird in a cage. People need freedom for choosing what they want to do, saying their ideas, and voting.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The documentary “Food, Inc.” portrays the dangers and the transformations in the American food industry, saying its harmful effects to public health, the environment and the rights of workers and animals. Large corporations such as Monsanto, producer of genetically modified foods, the U.S. meat companies Tyson Food Inc. and Smithfield Foods and poultry producer Perdue Farms refused to be interviewed for the film.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of these are directly related. The first is “the right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return, which will give him and his family a decent living” and the second is “the right of every businessman, large or small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition, and domination by monopolies at home or abroad.” The film food, Inc. portrays farmers in today’s world, most of whom are being forced into debt or forced out of business by corporate farms along with the effects GMO seeds are having on their farms and farming practices. This includes, the farmer’s inability to save seed and inhumane practices they are forced to implement on their farms. Such as the overcrowding of…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Baldwin’s statement about “what it really means by freedom” that challenged the United States to rethink the meaning of the statement because racism segregation was still happening. On the February of the year of 1960, four black students from North Carolina and Agriculture and Technical State University which in short terms was a black only college. All four students entered a local Woolworth’s store to purchase a couple of items and bravely decided to sit down at a white’s only lunch counter. Do to the color of their skin these individuals were told they would not be served, but they remained in their sits until closing and kept coming back every morning. They were able to gather support from other students and even gathered the…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom has always been a right in my eyes. I was born and raised in the United States where for as long as I can remember I was taught about how truly grateful I should be for living in a place that offers all the freedoms it does. Living here I was brought up believing that all freedoms were rights and everyone should have them no matter what. However James Baldwin brings a different view into play saying that freedom should not be looked at as a right but rather something that needs to be obtained through work. This view however only applies to some places but not others.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Future of Food

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the passed couple of decades, the foods we deem to be natural or of the Earth are instead Genetically Engineered. The term Genetically Engineered does not mean that the entire vegetable or food is fake but rather means that there is at least one genetically modified ingredient in the food that is sold all over stores, which raises a great health concern for many people. In the feature production of the documentary known as The Future of Food looks at how modern day technology has changed the food we consume and the effects it can have on our health. In watching this film about all the advancements that science has come to in the world with the food being eaten everyday, both the positive and negative effects of all those technological changes, its only right to think of the countries that barely have enough food in general or the people who are losing their livelihoods because of the advancements created by science in first world countries. A first world country like the United States has not only a great amount but also lots of variety of nutrition; however, even this is still not enough to “satisfy” such a wealthy nation because steps are still being taken to continue to “improve” nature. Projects were done that helped produce corn in all kinds of different colors and creating bigger than normal sized strawberries. A question seems to arise, is all this technological advancement necessary? Are we as a society taking unnecessary measures to “fix” something that is natural and worked since the beginning of time?…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays