Preview

Westboro Baptist Church has the right to protest military funeral are protected by the First Amendment.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Westboro Baptist Church has the right to protest military funeral are protected by the First Amendment.
Westboro Baptist Church has the right to protest military funeral are protected by the First Amendment. Although it is within the legal rights of the Westboro Baptist Church,Picketing at military funerals is neither ethical nor justifiable. The church members should realize the unnecessary harm they have imposed on so many innocent people.

Protesters from the Westboro Baptist Church, reviled for such acts as showing up at the funerals of U.S. soldiers with signs reading "Thank God for Dead Soldiers" and "Pray for more dead soldiers", serve as no reason to consider weakening the First Amendment. The protesters are offensive, certainly, but they pose no threat to America or its citizens. Their protests have gained them no support for their ideas, and have even unified communities in opposition to the church and the ideas it promotes.

The Westboro Baptist Church has made a name for itself by protesting against homosexuality at funerals and other unexpected locations. Although their decision to protest at these solemn events is offensive to most people, the rights of the church, however ignorant and offensive, does have protection under the First Amendment.

The U.S. guarantees free speech to its citizens. The protests of the Westboro "church" are, in my opinion, morally reprehensible and cruel. But, once we start denying free speech to somebody, simply because we don't like their opinions, we undermine the rights on which our country is built, and we open the door to censorship.

The first amendment is there for everyone. We can't pick and choose who it is for when we all have freedom. We are all in America and whether everyone agrees or doesn't they have a right to freedom of speech just like everyone else. It does not state that only certain people can speak freely.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Westboro Baptist Church members led by Fred Phelps believe that God hates the United States and punishes its citizens for its acceptance of homosexuality. To express their beliefs, the church members picket military and other funerals. Phelps’ group pickets by carrying signs and singing songs while standing on public property. Other groups have been formed to protest Phelps’ group. The church claims their speech is protected by the First Amendment Freedom of Speech Clause in the United States Constitution. I agree that the church has this right as does the group protesting Phelp’s group, and neither is violating the constitutional rights of others, even though I believe the actions of Westboro Baptist Church are appalling and depraved.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phelps places before us a choice where we must decide between the ethical values of basic respect versus the legal right of the First Amendment, freedom of speech. From an ethical perspective, it is easy to decide this case based upon the ideas that we adopted over time that all in all became a social norm. The ethical value of respect at a funeral will easily make someone choose the side of Snyder’s in this case just because over time we have established that funerals are meant to mourn and to pay respect to not only the fallen but also the family of that person. Although it may be interpreted that the reason that the Westboro Church chose to take action the way that they did was because it was necessary to get their point across, ethically it is frowned upon because of how we know funerals are supposed to take place. The Westboro Church had many options to establish the point that they were trying to get across such as the newspaper, TV, or the radio, but instead they chose to do it at a US Marine’s funeral which ended up working in their favor gaining them national recognition. Potter Stewart, a once US Justice wrote with regards to Ethics that, “Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do." This quote explains the complete ethical aspect of this case because it describes how legally, the Westboro Church had every right to do what they did that day but ethically they were in the wrong intruding on the…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    How has your exploration of the connections between your prescribed texts enhanced your understanding of the values and contexts of each?…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (http://www.law.cornell.edu).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Known for its fight against the alternative lifestyles of the homosexual community, the members of the Westboro Baptist Church have often times been referred to as the serial protesters and also have been characterized as a hate group. This church is an independent church founded by Fred Phelps in 1955. The group contains 71 members most of which are of Phelps family. Their congregations include picketing and the desecration of the American flag. Theologically speaking they refer to themselves as Calvinist. The church’s view is that most religious groups are Satan worshipers, frauds, and teach lies. They believe that “God Hates fags” and that it should be a crime. The two most notable groups that Westboro Baptist Church has chosen to picket are homosexuals and celebrities. This organization is without a question unique in its own…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As an Administrator of our local nursing home it has come to my attention that we have been bought out by a national group. With this change being made there will unfortunately be displacement of some of our residents. This paper will describe both the advantages and disadvantages of using different types of media for communication. It will also describe the effects of HIPAA on these types of communication.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment guarantees “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.” The freedom of speech, press, and religion have been pillars of the United States and other Democratic nations who knew the need to have these rights guaranteed. This idea was a major element of the Enlightenment period, the thoughts of John Locke, Jean Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire would be incorporated into the Constitution which included Freedom of Speech as a Human Right. Schenck v United States rules that the First Amendment stands for all speech as long as it doesn’t cause a “Clear and Present Danger.” No laws have been placed to decrease opinion.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Main Street Church planned on passing out religious pamphlets to the public during the Open House of the Brigham City Latter day Saints Temple. The religious-themed literature made comparisons between the beliefs of the Main Street Church and those of the LDS Temple. The church was banned from circulating their pamphlets on the two public sidewalks most trafficked by those going and coming from the LDS Temple. Additionally, the Main Street Church has also moved for a temporary restraining order to prohibit the city from further restriction of the church’s rights to assembly, free speech, and free exercise of religion in a traditional public forum.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment of the US Constitution has come into a lot of political controversy because it gives us some of the very essential rights to be whom we want to be. Under the first amendment we as United States citizens have the right to “freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble”, which some people don’t want us to have these rights and will try to come up with laws to restrain us from using them so it can benefit their cause (Ivers, 2013). I feel that the government wants to have the power to keep us in control and be able to do what they want, when they want with us.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The matter up for interpretation was whether or not the signs and comments from the Westboro Baptist Church were speaking on “matters of public concern.” They analyzed the content, form, and context of the speech to decide if it related to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community. The Supreme Court said that, because the picketers were on public land, adjacent to a public street, and the overall theme of their speech was related to broader public issues, Phelps and the other picketers were speaking on matters of public concern and were entitled to protection from the First Amendment. This was decided in an 8-1…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances”(U.S. Const. amend. I).…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The First Amendment is the freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly , and petition. This may be the most revered of the Amendment's. The First Amendment protects our rights to say and write out opinions, worship how we please, assemble together peacefully, and petition our government, if we feel the need.”…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paradigm Shift In America

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Founding Fathers separated church and state while explicitly declaring that our rights come from our creator. This cannot be overlooked our forefathers wanted God and Biblical values to be part of our existence and way of life. Make no mistake the very Christian values and rights of Americans are under attack. It usually starts with a small sample of Americans who actually believe that by Christians exercising their God given rights are somehow in their minds affronting them. This leads to a dispute and the Christian ends up conceding some or all of his or her rights in the name of political correctness. You see the same thing in the freedom of speech arena. A common sense right that our Forefathers deemed important is bastardized to mean anyone can say anything no matter how disruptive, vulgar, destructive. Yet a Christian Chaplin’s are commanded not to and punished if they use Jesus name in a Christian prayer! I believe that this happens in part because Christian Americans are often non-confrontational until it’s too late. This leads to a right or value lost that we won’t get back.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays