Preview

What Are The Rhetorical Techniques Used In Brutus Persuasive Speech

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Rhetorical Techniques Used In Brutus Persuasive Speech
In the Shakespeare play Julius Caesar , Brutus and Mark Antony both give speeches to persuade the Roman people whether or not Caesar died for the good of Rome or so someone else could come into power. Based on the rhetorical appeals used in both speeches, Brutus’s speech was the most effective one in persuading the Roman citizens.
In his speech Brutus uses pathos to appeal to the emotions of the Roman citizens. He states,” Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” He uses this phrase to persuade the people that he did it for them because he cared about their well being more and would do anything for them. Brutus used this technique because the people are most likely mad that he just killed their leader, but if he can put it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Brutus and Antony's funeral speeches from Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" offers a profound insight into the art of persuasive oratory. Both orators possess distinct styles and objectives, making it a compelling exercise to evaluate which speech is superior in terms of effectiveness. Brutus, driven by his noble intentions and adherence to republican principles, delivers a rational and logical speech. He employs rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and logos to sway the crowd to his perspective.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus uses their passion to his advantage, and convinces the conspirators that their own will power would be what compelled them to complete their task, not an oath. Another piece of evidence used to illustrate this, is when Brutus is defending the reasons behind his actions at Caesar’s funeral and he says, “ As / Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, / I rejoice at it…” (JC.III.ii.24-26). By using the two words ‘loved’ and ‘weep’, Brutus is not only making himself seem vulnerable to the townspeople, but he is also showing that the death of Caesar was not necessarily what he wanted, and that the death of who was once his dear friend, upset him deeply. By doing this, people begin to feel sorry for Brutus, and they are not nearly as outraged as they are before he was given the opportunity to explain…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having had murdered his best friend and countries leader, Brutus attempts to justify his crimes, as well as the crimes of the conspirators, during a speech to the Roman people. Brutus uses pathos-filled diction, calling the audience “Romans” to incite patriotism, “countrymen” to unite himself and his audience, and “lovers” as a term of endearment, further bringing him closer to the crowd. He starts his defense using parallelism, commanding to “Hear me… Believe me… [and] Censure me” and reversing his sentence structure to create a verbal appealing seemingly logical argument. Moreover, he repeats these lines to remind the audience of his honorable and trustworthy reputation. He defends this reputation when using honeyed diction to describe his…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Rome were moved by both Brutus's and Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral. Persuasion can be ingenious in plentiful ways, Brutus and Antony swept the crowd in their own ways. However, by looking at the ethos, pathos, and logos in both Brutus's and Antony's speeches, Antony can be seen as more persuasive.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I know that men are won over less by the written than by the spoken word, that every great movement on this earth owes its growth to great orators and not to great writers." Most would agree with this, even find it wise or enlightening. They would be dismayed to discover that these are the words of Adolf Hitler, one of the most despised and dangerous men in history. The reason he was so dangerous? The very thing he accredits his success to in the quote above: his ability to speak. Hitler had a kind of rhetoric all his own that persuaded people to his side with horrifying effectiveness. “Language is a powerful weapon, and in the hands of a skilled person, it can be used to manipulate others.” Cassius in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is perhaps one of the best examples of this. In the first act alone, Cassius uses his abilities to appeal to Brutus’ sense of honor, twist Brutus’ image of Caesar, and put words into Brutus’ mouth that lead to a dastardly plot against a near king.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the script Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the characters Antony and Brutus both give the roman citizens a speech. The purpose of the speech is to persuade the citizens to “elect” who is going to be the new leader of Rome. Antony and Brutus both are genuinely strong at manipulating the citizens of Rome. Antony uses pathos and Brutus uses logos, but the speech that had the best effect was Antony’s. Antony was furtively trying to convince the people that Brutus was wrong and Caesar did not deserve to die.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reflect poorly on Brutus' character because it shows that he was fine with betraying someone who thought so highly of him. It makes him seem uncaring, a trait that someone in power should not have. This portrays Brutus as cold-hearted. By saying this, Antony is building up Caesar's character. He shows his compassion for the people, and how he sees himself no better as the people- when they are sad, it affects him too. The makes him seem like a good…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Brutus uses pathos is very strong. Brutus says how much he loved Caesar but he had to murder him for the better of Rome. Brutus said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Also, Brutus shows his sympathy over Caesar’s death. Brutus said, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant; I honor him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play of “Julius Caesar”, after Brutus speech about killing Caesar is for the good of Rome, Mark Antony began his speech, despite to all of the people who disagreed to his speech or the truth, he still wanted to revenge to those who murdered his beloved friend Caesar. Instead of using ethos or logos, Antony uses pathos to gain the crowd flavor and it’s extremely effective. Antony manages the people of Rome to almost cry for Caesar death and wanted to revenge for Caesar.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus’s also said, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” which appeals to logos because his is making a logical statement that says Caesar’s death was for the best to Rome’s men freedom. At the end Brutus appeals pathos by saying, “who is there so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended” Brutus tells the Roman citizen that Caesar deserved what he got because he was too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the romans his slave.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays