Another important person that took on a role was named Chester W. Nimitz who was the command in chief of the us pacific fleet he was the one who surrendered with japan in the end.This battle didn't turn out as bad for the us as it did for japan,Yamamoto planned to defeat the two islands that make up midway.He thought he would achieve since the attack of pearl harbor had just occurred, and left the us exposed.But instead of yamamoto's plan it backfired and killed more of his troops and took away his carriers,while the us only lost one carrier in return. …show more content…
The us benefited through its side, in the end japan had more major loss than the us, This turning point created a chance to defeat japan and i don't think the british and japan were ready for it.
If this war would have played out differently i think it would have ended bad for the us,
Since the attack of pearl harbor had just occurred, therefore the us being defeated would mean more power takeover from japan and other allies.This war was worried aiding for many people
It was meant to happen.
The cost was almost nothing from the us since they only lose one us carrier, while japan lost four carriers.Yamamoto was not expecting that so that's why the japanese reacted more than the