Preview

What is Consequentialism?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What is Consequentialism?
What is Consequentialism?
Introduction
Consequentialism is a concept dealing with morality and its related theories based on the consequences of a person's conduct. The judgment that is passed about that person is dependent on the morality of the conduct or the act. That is why, a morally correct act is believe to result in good outcome or consequences. This view is also referred to as aphorism or the ends justify the means.
Consequentialism is different from deontology (deriving right or wrong of a person's conduct from the type of behavior than the outcomes of the conduct) as well as from virtue ethics (focusing on the agents character than the nature of the act).
The different types of consequentialism depend on the consequences that are considered most as good. Utilitarianism is about a good action that results in increase in the level of pleasure and an action is rated as the best when the consequence is most pleasure. Eudaimonic consequentialism is about leading a full life which may not be equal to having to enjoy great amount of pleasure as a primary aim. Aesthetic consequentialism is about producing beauty as the ultimate aim.
The basic difference between these three types of morality lie more in the approach of moral dilemmas rather than the conclusion that is drawn.
Example
Let’s take an example that will explain consequentialism.
Taking into the various Corporate Social Responsibility activities that are done occasionally by the corporate houses, an example can be cited from there. A particular organization has decided to put in $100,000 to help the Tsunami struck citizens. The two approaches that are considered include:
a. invest the amount to generate job opportunities for the people and help in their income
b. invest in the relief work and generate fund for the food camps, thereby ensuring a rise in the fund and help in feeding the families that are in dire need of food
Three lessons from the example:
For both these policies, there will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Eco 561 Final Exam

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    D. employ the combination of resources that will produce the profit-maximizing output at the minimum cost…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. Review the plan's investment choices and if they are strong, save as much as the company will match.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The utilitarian’s believe that the main thing that make an act morally right or wrong can be based on the consequences being beneficial. An ethics of virtue is based on the general idea or principle that a morally right act is the moral decision of what a virtuous person would do in any given situation. This is the key difference in utilitarianism and virtue ethics. The deontological theory says that people should stick to their obligations and duties when analyzing an ethical dilemma. They believe that a person should follow their own responsibilities to any other person as well as to society because doing what you are obligated to do is deemed morally right and ethically correct. Virtue ethics describes that the character is the moral force for the ethical behavior rather than rules of deontological and utilitarianisms. The difference between these three views is that the morality seems to depend more on the way the moral issues are approached than in the moral conclusion…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialists believe that whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the overall consequence of that act, where punishment should serve to promote good, contributing to crime prevention or societal welfare.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week 1

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Virtue theory emphasizes character traits rather than the rules or consequences while deontology is described as an action that is right only if it is in accordance with a moral rule or principle. Utilitarianism puts more emphasis on the consequences and that decisions should be made based on happiness for the greatest number of people.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between these three approaches to morality tends to lie more in the way moral dilemmas are approached than in the moral conclusions reached. The perfect example would be people argue that lying is wrong because of the negative consequence produced by lying. However, consequentialists may allow that certain foreseeable consequences might make lying acceptable.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * A personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C. invest only in business opportunities where it is possible to take an active role in management.…

    • 2602 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The result of a situation or dilemma is through sound ethical and moral decisions. The differences between the three theories are virtue is an individual assessment, utilitarianism is for the group, and deontology is the duty of the individual or group. Virtue and the goal of achieving the best can cause an individual to question morals and ethics. Cheating to be the best is not moral or ethical. Knowing 100% is put forth toward a goal will bring out the positive characteristics of an individual. Utilitarianism refers to ethical and morality issues by focusing on the overall balance of good over bad consequences of the group. A corporation that reduces medical benefits of the employees to increase corporate bonuses is unethical. A police officer pulls a car over and a fellow officer is driving while intoxicated. The deontology theory would require the officer to arrest the friend because of duty and obligation to the…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week One Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Virtue, deontological, and utilitarianism theories have similarities and differences. Each theory applies to morals and ethics in specific ways, just as virtue, values, and morality have a specific relationship with one another.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act consequentialism supports the idea that actions are made right or wrong based solely on their consequences. This means that a person would look to the consequences of a certain action to determine whether or not that action is right or wrong. A ‘right’ action would be one that leads to the best results where as a ‘wrong’ action would be one with less than ideal consequences. According to this basic theory, one would always choose the ‘right’ action because it leads to the most favorable consequences. Though this theory can sound appealing, I do not agree fully that actions are determined solely based on consequences. I think that everyone has their own set of moral ethics or values and these can affect whether or not a person sees a particular action as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. One definition of…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I do believe that consequentialism is the right way to set the standards of whether or not an action is moral, there is a major concern about it that sets it back. The set back that I am talking about is, sometimes the consequence that we want does not happen at all, and it turns into something that is completely opposite. Basically a mismatch happens in this situation. This is a problem in our ability to judge an action or person correctly. It is wrong to claim that a person’s action was immoral or even moral because the consequences turned out unexpectedly, but if we were to set our moral standards based on the idea of consequentialism this is what could happen.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The similarities between the three are that they determine good and bad traits about a person, and with the determination of their actions, it also determines the characteristic of the person which is virtue ethics. Utilitarianism is similar that finds the good in a person. One issue is that it avoids finding the bad in a person. With the deontological ethics the product of the action is good not bad. It holds acts that are morally obligatory for consequences made by human actions. The differences between the three ethics are, utilitarianism is an act that focuses on consequences. Virtue ethics is the character of a person not the actions of a person. Deontological ethics is a reflection of a person’s morality, which is ultimately a combination of that person’s attitude.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Adultery Wrong

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page

    Another problem with consequentialism is that the theory maintains that wrongness and rightness are not found in the action itself, but in the ramifications of it. The absurdity of this claim can be best seen with an example; adultery isn’t wrong in itself, but it is wrong when harmful effects are the result. More specifically, adultery is wrong if it causes the spouse harm, but morally correct if the result is a stronger marriage and a deeper connection. Calling adultery moral reveals the folly of consequentialism, and yet another reason why the moral rightness of an action cannot be determined by its corresponding consequences.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays