Preview

What Is Inevitable In The 16th And 17th Century Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Inevitable In The 16th And 17th Century Russia
The encounterance of struggle is inevitable in the attempt to figure out which system of government best fits a country’s population, culture, and lifestyle. Both Russia and England persevered through this period of struggle in the 16th and early 17th centuries en route to finally finding the system of government that worked for their countries. In England, the 16th and early 17th centuries were marked by the reigns of the Tudor and Stuart houses, which included famous monarchs like Henry VIII, Mary I, and Charles I. Although life in England during these times seemed peaceful and prosperous at first glance, it became clear over time that the English monarchs were giving themselves too much power, as evidenced by James I, Charles I, and Oliver …show more content…
As time wore on leading up to England’s Glorious Revolution in 1688, the increasing power of the monarchs led to: a severe rift between the monarchy and Parliament; alienation of those who practiced a different religion than the monarch; and an increase in taxes which inevitably angered the English population. The most significant conflict, which was one between the monarchs and Parliament, began with the Elizabethan Bargain which was established as soon as Elizabeth became Queen in 1533. In implementing this, she made herself responsible for calling Parliament to meet, and at the same time declared that they can only be responsible for money, banking, and all fiscal matters. In doing so, Elizabeth made it so she was in charge of military and religion, in essence authorizing the monarch to be the only one who could declare war. Since Elizabeth minimized the effects of the English Parliament, it was very easy for her successor, James I, to disregard Parliament entirely in his pursuit to rule absolutely. In analyzing this situation, it is clear that a system of checks and balances would have significantly benefited the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Russia 1450-1750

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages

    * The Orthodox Church followed this path as well and made Moscow the bureaucratic center of the Russian Orthodox Church…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Cecil’s influence touched on just about all aspects of policy that occurred during Elizabeth’s long reign. In the Royal Court he brought order and stability. Cecil was also highly influential in foreign policy. He saw France and Spain as threats to. It has also been argued that Cecil was not just the provider of advice and executor of the Queens wishes but also that he could have been the power behind the throne. Plenty of evidence has come to light that suggests that the Secretary regularly attempted to manipulate Elizabeth however it would be inaccurate to assume that all of Cecil’s personal agendas were fruitful, Elizabeth could make her own mind up and often did so. Although Cecil was a prominent figure during this time, Elizabeth was still the person who ruled the country and had her own ideas on how to run the country. Elizabeth was firmly in control of major policies and on many occasions obstinately ignored the Councils advice. The Council conscientiously carried out the Queens wishes even when it had advised otherwise. There is general agreement that, until its decline in the 1590s central government under Elizabeth was successful and that the Queen provided firm direction. According to Neale Parliament was another aspect that had influence over decision making in Elizabeth government He argues that the power of the House of Commons increased throughout Elizabeth’s reign. The number of conflicts Elizabeth had with individual MPs and the problems which the Stuarts experienced with Parliament are evidence for this. These developments were brought by the “Puritan Choir “who deliberately planned confrontations to force the issue of parliamentary privilege versus the royal prerogative. It is therefore necessary to investigate not only to what extent Cecil was involved in the decision making process but also the influence of the Parliament on Elizabeth and ultimately the decisions that were taken through this time of how many were Elizabeth’s own ideas.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the American revolution Britain received a tremendous shock to its system with the loss of the thirteen colonies. The war revealed Britain’s limitations and this heightened dissension and escalated political antagonism towards the monarch, George III, and his ministers. At this time the main issues concerning parliament were now representation, parliamentary reform, and government retrenchment.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia 1450-1750Western civilization changed significantly between 1450 and 1750. While Russia remained an agricultural society, the West became very commercially active and developed a strong manufacturing base. Many of the core areas of the West transformed; governments increased their powers, science became the focus of intellectual life. These changes resulted from overseas expansion. Russia, on the other hand, was heavily concerned with territorial expansion, eventually becoming the chief power of Eastern Europe. From there, Russian tsars began a course of selective Westernization which, despite imitating the West, kept them mostly outside the global trade system.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In attempting to compare theories of Government we need to look at the type of government in place in both England1 and The Ottoman Empire2,3 we need to define the period for comparison. It would be good to use descriptions of the rise of each form of government by following a timeline to form the basis of this essay. This unfortunately can't be the case, other than time there is no like-for-like comparison. The Ottoman’s imperial or dynastic monarchy, with a realm, extending over many countries needs to be looked at as an empire with responsibilities, which are by their very nature, complicated by the cultures they cross. England’s feudal monarchy and its constitutional executive government was very much focussed on internal affairs, ongoing wars and skirmishes with traditional foe, France, is somewhat the opposite of the Ottoman4.…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As is suggested in Source 12, ‘[Elizabeth] had to turn to parliament for assistance’ during much of her reign to fund wars which gave Parliament quite significant control over her policies. This realisation for parliament marked the beginning of an era of difficulties for monarchs and their parliaments. It can further be derived from Source 12 that ‘[parliament] used her need of [funds] to make their views known’. Parliament’s consistent use of this throughout James’ reign in questioning his authority (and therefore sparking a debate over divine right and parliamentary privilege) and policies was an attempt by Parliament to make themselves a necessary commodity. This is corroborated by Source 13, ‘If accept that kings have the power of imposing new and higher duties and the right to do this is confirmed, I do not see and likelihood of future parliaments.’ Parliament’s use of subsidies to control the monarch is further confirmed in Source 12, ‘they forced the queen to concede the substance of their demands’. However, far from making themselves indispensable (as is shown to be their intention in Source 13, ‘Where prince’s prerogatives grow, the liberties of subjects diminish’) Parliament primarily succeeded in driving a greater wedge between themselves and James. James…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Empire In Transition

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. How did the relationship between the king and Parliament change during the early 18th century?…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 16th and 17th century Europe, political views on the government varied in Europe. After the Catholic Church’s downfall, absolute monarchs dominated Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that mostly kings favored absolutism and have superiority over their people. On the other hand, some viewed absolutism as a power that made people inferior to the government.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In England, during the first half of the 17th century, two monarchs came to power that attempted to develop royal absolutism in that country. Both James I (James VI of Scotland) and Charles I tried to rule without consenting Parliament, but Parliament had so much control at the time that neither James nor Charles successfully decreased the role of Parliament in English government. The English had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for so long that they weren't ready to give all the power of government to a single person. The merchants and land-owning nobles supported Parliament, where members could be elected and changed in necessary, rather than an absolute monarch with no restraints. In 1642, differences between…

    • 751 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Louis XIV came into power, he was too young to rule the nation on his own for he was only 5 years old. His chief minister, Cardinal Mazarin, who ruled until his death in 1661, had one goal in mind, absolute rule by the royal administration. For 3 years, French noblemen rebelled against this with the claim that they were not rioting against the king, but merely the appointed. At the same time, James VI of Scotland became James I of England and created the Stuart Dynasty. The Stuart Dynasty’s main objective was the same as France, absolute power, leaving the nobles and the elites handicapped. They, however, rebelled victoriously against the new law. In both countries, the monarchy wanted complete absolutism. One prevailed and the other compromised.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the two political models of absolutism and constitutionalism is the catalyst for the progression in English politics. With William and Mary as their rulers, the Parliament didn’t need to worry about a Catholic ruler and even better they were able to get their rulers to recognize the Bill of Rights of 1689. Finally able to limit the power of the monarch, making the ruler subject to the law and the consent of Parliament, the theory of a constitutional monarchy was put into action through this bill. This is the beginning of England’s, later Great Britain, rise to being a world power and setting an example that others will soon…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glorious Revolution Causes

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This paper defines the term ‘Glorious Revolution’. It is regarded as the revolt of compromise or mutual consent. It portrays how the entire country England makes a dramatic change in her ruling system. By abolishing tyrannical system, the country establishes democratic rule without any bloody battle. It also gives us some idea about the situation that was prevailed before the revolution, the reasons that led this revolution happen along with its significance. It will also talk about different laws and acts that were imposed in the country after the revolution. It basically aims at to familiarize the event that occurred in 1688 in England.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Revolution Essay

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper has referenced the british parliament more than once, however many aren’t aware of what parliament is. Parliament isn’t the british government, but rather a group of politicians who meet to make decisions for Britain. At the time, the prime minister was George Grenville. With Britain burdened with heavy debts from the Seven Years war, it was up to Prime Minister Grenville to find a solution to propose to King George III. As mentioned above, the english parliament passed act after act in order to rebuild their finances.While their intention of escaping debt appeared logical, the parliament unreasonably wouldn’t allow the colonies to send a representative to the meetings. These taxes not only affected Britain, but the colonies that were thousands of miles away. By taking the colonists’ voice away, conflict and ideals of independence were introduced.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays