Preview

What Is The Difference Between Peasants And Serfs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between Peasants And Serfs
During the Middle Ages peasants, serfs, and freemen were at the bottom of the classification system, and lived a hard life.

Peasants had a certain way to live life and once you were born into the a peasant household or family you had to stay in the family. “The peasant class included Freemen, who has some rights, land serfs, who had no rights, and slaves, who were bought and sold” (Newman). Peasants had to realize that having some rights or no rights at all was a part of who they were. This became their reality because they were the lowest of the people and knew that. “The peasants were at the bottom of the Feudal System and had to obey their local lord to whom they had sworn an oath of obedience on the Bible” (Trueman). Obeying their lord
…show more content…
“Freeman were poor farmers who had control of small portions of land. Freeman usually made just enough money to live on” (Newman). Freemen had to accomplish all of the life’s necessities so there was never any money to waste. “Serfs had no political power and were not allowed having control of property. They lived on the property of a noble vassal, and in order to repay the vassal for letting the serf live on his property the serf worked the land and was at the disposal of the vassal” (Newman). Serfs were extremely poor that they could not own their own property; they had to work and live on someone’s land that was higher up than they were. “Serf: Peasant worker on a manor whose position was hereditary and who could not leave the manor without the landlord’s permission” (Corrick 101). Serfs had no say in what they could and couldn’t do or how their life went because they were born into the family, and it was their destiny. “Serfs had to work as menial labor while peasants could live free doing their own chosen business” (ask about this). Peasants chose what they got to do in life and decided their own destiny, but on the other hand serfs lived their whole life stuck doing what their lord asked of him. Even though peasants were free and got to do whatever they pleased to do they still had things to get done. These things or task were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    By 900, most people lived on manors, as either the landlord or the serfs. These self sufficient estates were maintained by new agricultural techniques, like the moldboard plow, the three-field system and the horse collar, making it easier for people to cultivate the land. Eventually, this would lead to a population growth, which would in turn spur the economy. With the increase in population came the increase in new markets. Growing trade then allowed for new towns to expand. Consequently, landlords wanted to cultivate more land so they needed the serfs, who were then given some freedom and many became free peasants. The pace of this economic life created less rigid social structures and more commercial, market oriented economies. Lastly, urban areas developed and literacy, language, new religions and education increased. All of which profoundly impacted the social structure of these times.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whap Chapter 18 Hrt

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Serfdom of Russia: Serfs were not given many rights, but were used for labor on the large lands the powerful leaders and people of the time had…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ch 18 21 22 ap world vocab

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Why: peasants wanted to end serfdom, taxation, military conscription, and wanted to abolish landed aristocracy.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap World Ch.10

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Manorialism was the organization of economic and political obligations between landlords and peasants. In this type of local political organization, serfs, or people living and working on manors, bore many burdens from society, but they were not slaves. Serfs retained some political freedoms; they had inheritable ownership of houses and land as long as they met all obligations. As far as their economic power, the peasant villages created…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initially a significant departure from the previous system, Serf emancipation had the unexpected consequence of substituting the serf’s personal relationship with the land owner with a more formal and commercial relationship with the state. Under the proposed emancipation, the Serfs would receive the land upon which they currently worked and the landowners would be compensated by the government. The newly liberated serfs, would in theory, be able to independently farm and manage their own land which they could use to generate profit. However in reality, the government was woefully short of money and instead of simply granting the new peasants their land, the peasants would now have to pay 49 years worth of redemption taxes as well as paying taxes which they had never had to pay previously. Furthermore, the land owning nobility (who were tasked with formulating the emancipation) greatly overvalued the land and as a result many of the newly liberated peasants were working 20% land then they had previous to their emancipation. Indeed far from receiving more freedoms and liberties, peasants were now legally forced to carry a passport, were unable to freely migrate and, crucially, were now liable for conscription. Yet, to 1881, the peasants were on the whole more autonomous, though in practicality they were limited by having to pay taxes…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead peasants were transferred into working in factories due to the increase of industrialization in this period. The factories proved to need more labor in them to produce a significant amount of goods. The demand for peasant workers was not as high as it used to be because of slave labor. As more people began to own slaves, they did not find much use for indentured servants anymore. Some freedom of the peasants was also being taken away.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Rome Fall Essay

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rise of taxes wasn’t easy on anyone. Taxes made most of the peasants’ day to day lives difficult to live. There was really no way for them to escape the taxes, which forced them to give themselves to others and work as slaves. Slaves became very important to rich people because they would do things that needed to be done. They would take care of the fields and the crops, and they would also take…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rural poverty for peasants in the British Isles was key in them hoping for a new start in the New World. In early England, more than half of the population were in poverty. The increase in inflation proposed new issues for these people that they were not dealing with before. The prices of goods were continuously rising, making it more difficult for peasants to live in their daily lives. During the 17th century, there was a rise in peasants settling in American colonies because of the weak economy during this time. It is understandable that these peasants would risk their lives to hope for better economic opportunity in the American colonies.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peasants are perhaps the most important members of a society; they perform many of the jobs that are vital to supporting a large population. But, they are the poorest and usually own little to no land and thus, have no power. Therefore they have usually been the lowest ranking in a society throughout history, and classical China and India are no exception. However, of the two societies,…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While slaves were almost considered as a hard property of the owners (items had no rights by the owners’ standard), serfs did have little, if no, liberty. According to the Code of Law in 1649, Russian landlords had no rights to kill the serfs, though punishment was permissable. Serfs in Russia, technically, were bound to the land, instead of the landowners. They could have little property and personal items, but that fact would be they were severly exploited. The little rights does not mean that serfs’ conditions surpassed slaves’ much. Serfs still did not have the freedom of movement. In the late seventeenth centuary, serfs could be transferred, if not sold, to another landowners without land. In other words, this change defiantly ignored the concept of serfdom, the bound to land. In both Caribbean territories and Russian empire, landowners had the rights to catch the fugitives (runaways) and the serfs or slaves were often cruelly punished, such as whipping for hours, if not killed.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A major difficulty of a serf's life was that his work for his lord coincided with, and took precedence over, the work he had to perform on his own lands…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Serfs, who were not free persons, had some rights but many burdensome obligations. Unlike slaves, they could not be sold off the land or dispossessed from their landholdings. Their tenure on their farms was hereditary, but they owed heavy rent to the landlord in the form of labor and share of their crops and livestock. There were many restrictions on their personal freedom; they needed the landlord’s permission to leave the estate, to marry, or to pass on personal property on their heirs.” Medieval peasants had a hard life, and they couldn’t even work hard to get into a better position in life.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lowest strata of society remained the peasant. The peasant supported all other estates of society not only through direct taxation but in the production of agriculture and the keeping of livestock. The peasant was the property of whomever he was subject to. Be it bishop, prince, a town or a noble, the peasant and all things associated with him were subject to any whim whatsoever. Countless taxes were exacted on the peasant, forcing more and more of his time to be spent working on his lord’s estate. Most of what he produced was taken in the form of a tithe or some other tax. The peasant could not hunt, fish or chop wood freely in the early sixteenth century as the lords had recently taken these commonly held lands for their own purposes. The lord had rights to use the peasant’s land as he wished; the peasant could do nothing but watch idly by as his crops were destroyed by wild game and nobles on the chivalric hunt. When a peasant wished to marry, he required the lord's permission as well as having to pay a tax. When the peasant died, the lord was entitled to his best cattle, his best garment and his best tool.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As feudalism was introduced, society changed. The social classes changed; the king was the top then came church officials and nobles then came knights then peasants. A status of a person in the feudal system influenced a person’s power. Many serfs lived on their lord’s manors and carried out services for him. Feudal lords had armies of knights that protected the lord’s manor.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This last class was divided into two groups consisting of free peasants and indentured servants. The free peasants held their own businesses and paid rent to the lords in order to use their lands. The indentures peasants, however, where bound to the land in which they labored to earn their stay. When the lands changed ownerships, the peasants living in those lands immediately came under the jurisdiction of the new lord. That class was under the control of these nobles who squeezed the peasantry hard in effort to maintain their luxurious lifestyle (Tignor p 428).…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays