Differential Theory And White Collar Crimes
Jessie Betts Florida A&M University
Theories of Criminal Behavior
Dr. Harris
3/8/2015
2
What is the Differential Association Theory? Differential Association is a certain theory in criminology developed by a man named Edward Sutherland. This theory by definition in the criminology prospective, proposes that through interaction with others, individuals learn different traits. Some of these traits that are learned are common traits such as values, attitudes, techniques, and motive. These certain motives are motives learned for criminal behavior. This is a very common theory, one that is most known for defiance. According to a certain website article, The Differential Association, “His theory gives priority to the power of social influences and learning experiences and can be expressed in terms of a series of propositions.” Something associated with Differential Association would be White Collar Crime. These two things go along together hand and hand with each other. What is White Collar Crime? White Collar Crime is also made up by the same man Edward Sutherland. This type of crime claims to be non-violent but I see this in a different perspective. This type of crime refers to being financially motivated and is committed by government or business men and women. This type of crime was first established in 1939. According to the article online, Lying Cheating, and Stealing, “A single scam can destroy a company, devastate families by wiping out their life savings, or cost investors billions of dollars.” The relationship between Differential Association and White Collar Crime are simple. People in this world usually want to become rich and wealthy. Dealing with White Collar Crime people are usually of the higher power and are known for being very respectable. By being financially motivated people do what they think are non-violent crimes such as smuggling money illegally. Thus, these things turn into traits individuals learn to keep committing these
3
types of crimes with. Let’s take the stock market for instance, people aren’t stupid and definitely are not just going to invest their money into someone or something they think is going to steal it. This is when the White Collar Crime people start to come in. Con-artist people are people who are smooth talkers and are very confident in what they do. They have certain goals they need to achieve.
For example, from the you tube video of the Ponzi scheme of Bernie Madoff, He was a person that people felt as though they could trust. The people Bernie stole billions of dollars from went on to explain that he was a man of trust and higher power. Bernie wasn’t just a person of trust they thought, the people felt as though he was a good friend and wanted to sincerely help them with their money. These are the type on con-artist that people end up falling for because they feel as though they can trust where they are putting their money, knowing little to nothing where it actually going. Bernie was promising his investors steady constant returns of their money back. Usually con-artist will promise their investors double back or triple back but that is when the investors start to get suspicious. That is why Bernie took a better and more intelligent route by telling his investors what they wanted to hear. Another example of this relationship of the two theories, also from the video clip, it goes on to explain that investors want security and stability; These are the two things the investors Bernie took advantage of were promised. Bernie carried traits such as criminal attitudes, techniques, values, and motives as I explained earlier from the Differential Association theory. The question was if Bernie was actually this type of person in the beginning of his criminal career, or if he became this type of person learning traits to help his Ponzi scheme to .
4
become even bigger. Madoff’s criminal behavior was when he was making fake trades and sells of his investor’s money. He was depositing every dollar he gained into his own bank account never actually trading or selling anything. People who think they aren’t doing anything wrong are simply investing their money into a man who is using it for criminal activity There are nine propositions of the causes of crime. The first cause is that criminal behavior is learned. Not all people may start out as criminals. The second cause is criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others in a process of communication, meaning they may watch other con-artists and how they achieve what they do and simply learn traits. The third cause is the learning of these traits usually happen in intimate groups, small groups of a trusted few. The fourth cause is when criminal behavior is learned the learning includes: techniques of committing the crime and specific direction of motives. Not only motives are learned but also different attitudes, drives, rationalizations etc. The techniques may be complicated or very simple. The fifth cause is the direction of motives is learned from definition. This means that if there are legal codes they are either favorable or non-favorable. The sixth cause of crime is the person starts to become defiant. There are so many definitions that the person starts to not care about favorable or unfavorable violations of the law. Thus, this brings us back to the theory of Differential Association. The seventh cause is the Differential Association’s may vary in many ways. The eighth cause is the process of learning criminal behavior. The ninth cause while this criminal behavior is just an expression of general needs and values it is not expressed the same as non-criminal needs and values. This means that the criminal uses this as an excuse that they committed these acts of violence because they needed the same values as people who don’t commit the crimes. 5
Now in time, scams are becoming more and more sophisticated. It’s becoming harder to figure out the people who are committing these scams because they are finding ways to commit these crimes without getting caught. Another example of a huge White Collar Crime case was the Enron Collapse. According to the blog, 10 White Collar Cases that Made Headlines, “Jeffrey Skilling, who served as president COO and CEO, along with a staff he assembled, hid billions of dollars of debt through poor financial reporting, accounting loopholes and the use of special purpose entities. “ This was just one of the people involved in this case that caused this destruction to take place. Above, the third cause of proposition explained that these criminal traits and doings usually happen in intimate groups, and that is exactly what happened in the Enron Collapse. It was not just one person there were multiple people who participated. The business was destructed by multiple business people with lies and mistrust. People are starting to lack trust in our stock markets because of these schemes that have been taking place. People are finding it hard to trust others to save their money because money is so crucial to living. The 1920’s for example had a huge stock fall and a great depression. Most of the banks ran out of money and with this, the people who invested their money into these banks also lost all of their money. People became furious and stopped investing their money into banks completely. Individuals who lived through this period of time explained that instead of investing their money into banks they either kept their money in secret places or even buried money into the ground. These are just a couple situations and reasons why people commit crimes dealing with the Differential Association Theory.
6
Reference Page
Writers, S. (2011, June 5). 10 White Collar Crime Cases That Made Headlines - Criminal Justice USA. Retrieved March 9, 2015, from http://www.criminaljusticeusa.com/blog/2011/10-white-collar-crime-cases-that-made-headlines/
Lying, Cheating, and Stealing. (2010, March 17). Retrieved March 9, 2015, from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/white_collar
Differential Association. (n.d.). Retrieved March 9, 2015, from http://www.d.umn.edu/~bmork/2306/Theories/BAMdiffassn.htm
FILM:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2nX3FdRyR0
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In support of this theory, Edwin Sutherland, a criminologist in 1939 introduced differential association theory of deviance – in which he identified 3 factors, which determine deviance.…
- 6242 Words
- 25 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This paper explores how Differential Association Theory, Techniques of Neutralization and the Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory explain deviance in the crimes of larceny and murder. These theories have intertwining perspectives on why individuals partake in criminal behaviors such as theft and homicide. The Differential Association Theory acknowledges that criminal behavior is learned and not hereditary, Techniques of Neutralization expands on the idea that individuals lack responsibility for their actions and Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory states four components influence the social bond: attachment, commitment, involvement and moral beliefs.…
- 87 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
6. According to differential association theory, how does learning criminal behavior differ from learning other types of behavior? There is no difference between learning criminal and noncriminal behavior.…
- 1095 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Differential Association was designed by Ewin Sutherland and his theory can mostly be demonstrated through interaction with others, individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behavior. Ewin Sutherland also states that individual conducts when regarding differential association, people learn the same in criminal behavior as they do in other types of actions as can be non-criminal attitudes as well. Differential association is a leaned behavior that develops over time and one’s surroundings. Environment surroundings have a major influence in your daily life and who is in it. Learning theories stand in contrast to theories which argue that social class, broken homes, race, age among other valuables lead to crime.…
- 126 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Sutherland’s theory of differential association is a micro theory that proposes why an individual is drawn to crime. To begin with, Sutherland believed that the context that individuals were brought up in, determined the amount of crime that a person would be involved in. Sutherland felt that this was because especially…
- 601 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
a General Theory of Crime, Differential Association Theory, and General Strain Theory. Sage, 57, 853.…
- 2253 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Differential Association- Reinforcement: A theory of criminality based on the incorporation of psychological learning theory and differential association with social learning theory. Criminal behavior, the theory claims, is learned through associations and is contained or discontinued as a result of positive or negative reinforcements.…
- 1517 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Differential Association-a theory developed by Edwin Sutherland proposing that through interaction with others, individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behavior (how people learn to become criminals).…
- 1495 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Thank you for your post. I liked your answer to my question. I agree with you that if one were confident with themselves, they will not “follow” others and therefore the differential association theory would not explain deviant actions. It is funny that you brought up the speed limit question. I was driving home from work yesterday and everybody was speeding. I was thinking of how deviant they were! I had never thought of speeding as a deviant act until the activities inventory assignment last week.…
- 93 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Burgess, R, Akers, L, R., (1966), “A Differential Association-Reinforcement Theory of Criminal Behavior.” Social Problems, Vol.14, pp.363-383.…
- 3366 Words
- 14 Pages
Best Essays -
11. Matsueda, Ross L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. London: Sage Publication.…
- 2054 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The types of crime had more widespread dangers to civil society both in term of human cost and tax dollar, is White collar and which had more extensive consequences. Professor Edwin Hardin Sutherland (1949) was the first to coin the term, and hypothesize white-collar criminals attributed different characteristics and motives than typical street criminals. White collar is a financial motivated, economic, non violent crime committed for illegal monetary gain as a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation. For instance, one of the most notorious corporate crimes was committed by Ford executives in Houston kept faulty Firestone tires on their Explores that cost the lives of 200 people, and not one executive spent even a single day in jail. In contrast with street crime committed by poor individuals financial motivated to commit crime if they are caught stealing cars it’s more likely that they will be sent to prison for years (p. 145 -146). Furthermore, “The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison”, this article is very true in the way that the poor get discriminated on in almost every…
- 1297 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Edwin H. Sutherland defined white collar crime as “a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation” (Benson and Simpson 2009). White-collar crimes and white-collar crime offenders differ from other criminal offenders and offenses for several reasons. The motive, the act of concealment, intent and the disguise separate white collar criminals from other criminals (Edelhertz, 1970).…
- 6786 Words
- 28 Pages
Powerful Essays -
-Differential Association: Criminal behavior results from having more contact w/ individuals holding aattitudes favorable to crime than w/ those holding attitudes discouraging it.…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The differential association theory focus on the social group-environment. In this theory it believes that people who associate with those who do not commit crimes will do the same. The opposite goes for those who are associated with those who does commit crimes (University of Phoenix,…
- 1050 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays