Preview

What is the North-South divide, how does it contribute to explaining global poverty and why is it sometimes said to be an outdated idea?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What is the North-South divide, how does it contribute to explaining global poverty and why is it sometimes said to be an outdated idea?
What is the North-South divide, how does it contribute to explaining global poverty and why is it sometimes said to be an outdated idea? 24 marks
The North and South divide refers to the division of the world into a primarily rich, industrialised North Hemisphere and a poor, developing Southern Hemisphere which is almost entirely dependent on the North. This idea reached its peak with the publishing of the Brandt report in 1980, which made 10 key proposals for policies to reduce the global inequality between the north and the south. All 8 of the G8 nations are in the Northern Hemisphere and out of the 30 members of the OECD, 26 are northern countries. This concept is believed to belong to the neo-colonialist school of thought who believe that the origin of this divide came from the exploitation of the South by the North through colonialism, which, they argue, has been reasserted by the forces of globalisation in recent years.
The North and South divide explains that the practices of TNCs and the huge amount of debt that developing countries have helped to perpetuate structural inequalities between the richer and high wage north and the low wage south. There is evidence which shows that there has been an increase in global inequality in the past few decades with the rise of globalisation. In 1960 the income of the richest 20% of the world’s population was about 30 times that of the poorest 20%, by 2000 this reached 74 times greater. In 2001 the poorest 1.2 billion only accounted for 1.3% of global consumption.
Some see that the gain that the north has enjoyed because of globalisation has been at the expense of the south and that has contributed to global poverty. This is because, it is argued that the north is the core area within the global economy, in that it is home to high technology production and large TNCs and the South is the peripheral area in the global economy which is still largely restricted to agricultural production and supply of raw materials.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sectionalism is how America is divided in half because of their opinions and views of slavery. The North and the South have two very differing views when it comes to economics, political stance and social class. When it come to economics the South built its economy through the use of farming and slaves. They produced products by cultivating crops and farming the land. The more slaves a landowner acquired the bigger the plantation and wealthier they became.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the most globalized era to date, the world faces many policy debates and questions. Many are fearful of globalization and are worried about the negative consequences it can produce. Brawley addresses these concerns in Chapter 3, “What People Fear-or Anticipate-about Globalization”. One issue people have about globalization is its ability to widen the gap of inequality between the rich and the poor, both domestically and across borders. Krugman uses the United States of America as a basis for the study of inequality in his chapter “Inequality and Redistribution.” On a global scale, Easterly explores foreign aid as a remedy for inequality in developing states in his chapter “The Legend of the Big Push.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jared Diamond explains why geographic luck is the leading cause to an unequal world which gave certain countries advantages and other's disadvantages.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The globalisation of economies has resulted in many winners from the developed nations while also improving improved the standard of living in many developing nations. As well as this numerous winners include most western nations, some third world labourers and international institutions. The globalisation of nation’s economies has definitely improved the lives of millions across the planet, in both developed and developing countries. By far the major winner from this process has been the citizens and corporations of developed countries. This is due to many factors that have come to fruition in the later half of the twentieth century. Specifically, the roles of TNC’s, global financial institutions and consumerism all have ties to economic globalisation. Despite the criticisms that surround transnational corporations, they have been directly investing in developing countries and with their expansion into these markets, have actually raised the standard of living in many third world countries. An example of a transnational corporation creating winners with the globalisation process is…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All over the world, disparities between the rich and poor, even in the wealthiest of nations is rising sharply. Fewer people are becoming increasingly “successful” and wealthy while a disproportionately larger population is also becoming even poorer. There are many issues involved when looking at poverty. It is not simply enough (or correct) to say that the poor are poor due to their own (or their government’s) bad governance and management. In fact, you could quite easily conclude that the poor are poor because the rich are rich and have the power to enforce trade agreements, which favor their interests more than the poorer nations. The book, The Bonfire of the Vanities by Tom Wolfe, illustrates clearly…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the opposite end on the spectrum, Paul Collier addresses inequality as the Alcatraz for developing nations. His prescriptions for poverty directly reflect his thesis on inequality that “as the bottom billion diverges from an increasingly sophisticated world economy, integration will become harder” (Collier 202). Collier views globalization as a series of “chutes and ladders” in which countries can rise or fall to the bottom and he views the poor nations of the world as the “unlucky minority” who “are stuck” and are unable to escape the “fourteenth-century conditions” (203). This leads to his call for international and domestic actions to avoid the “large islands of chaos” that leave “the twenty-first century world of material comfort, global travel and economic interdependence. increasingly vulnerable” (202). As such he believes that when addressing the bottom billion data must be focused on the population rather than income because the negligible income of the poor does little to skew the data appropriately. The author notes that the manner in which we address the data of the impoverished alters the manner in which we address poverty. Moreover, he asserts…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cultures of the North and south diverged, but the dependency upon one another did not. Proving to conflict when sectionalism tried to push them…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Half of these people, living in Sub-Saharan Africa, survive on below $2.00 a day. On the other hand, the income inequality that arrived with the advent of the industrial revolution has been steadily increasing in most developing and developed nations (UN, 2016). While it is tempting to think that the two completely correlate with each other, Dr. Sachs argues otherwise. Poverty in places like Sub-Saharan Africa is, he says, not because of rising income inequality or globalization for that matter, but because globalization has largely bypassed the region hardly influencing it or stimulating growth (Scientific American, 2016). It is at this stage that investments towards development enter the…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    example

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the early 1800’s the North and South developed different economies and social institutions. The…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The data for the calculation of global inequality come from individual countries’ household surveys, but they have to be complemented by an adjustment factor to convert national incomes into an international “currency” that has the same purchasing power in all countries of the world. Adjusted using PPP (purchasing power…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pentagon

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. Barnett breaks down the countries of the world into two groups; the functioning core and the non-integrating gap. The functioning core countries are those countries where globalization has taken root. Those are the countries with network connectivity, free trade and financial transactions, liberal media, and collective security. These regions have stable governments, rising standards of living, and more deaths by suicide than murder. Examples of these functioning states are the countries of North America, much of South America, the European Union, Russia, Japan, China, India, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. This equates to about 2/3 world’s population.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over time countries start to separate into those who are less-developed and poor and those that are well-developed and rich. The poorer countries often need help from the richer countries in order to survive. In recent years the gap between the richest and poorest countries has got wider and there are many ways in which the richer countries can work together to reduce these global inequalities.…

    • 814 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the fundamental questions regarding the world during all the time is why some counties are richer than others. How is it possible that there are some countries in 21st century, where families cannot feed their children, where education, medical care and simple things which are necessary for everyday life does not exist. And why does still more than half of the world population live worse than people who lived in the UK in 1900. (Krugman,Wells, Graddy, p. 611). Figure 1 shows the Gross National Income per Capita at 2007. It shows that lots of countries have very low national income, especially the African countries. Furthermore it shows that Europe, North America and Australia have the highest national income. The question is why this big difference? Economic growth is measured using real GDP per capita. “If economic growth is to give an indication of an increase in living standards, it has to be measured per head of the population.” (Sloman, Wride, p.256). Long run economic growth depends almost entirely on one ingredient, rising productivity. ”Overall GDP can grow because of population growth, but any large increase in real GDP per capita must be the result of increased output per worker.” (Krugman,Wells, Graddy , p 616) A number of factors affect the growth of productivity. Productivity equals real GDP by number of people working.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the World Bank (2000), “poverty is pronounced deprivation in well-being”. This of course begs the question of what is meant by well-being.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the divide between rich and poor nations that came about as a result of the Industrial…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays