Preview

What Is The Supreme Court Case Of Loving V. Virginia

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1112 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Supreme Court Case Of Loving V. Virginia
The Loving The 1950’s was not an easy time for love. Especially if you were the first interracial couple. To Mildred and Richard Loving they were just your average couple living in the 50’s. However, others thought their relationship was sick and should not be allowed. Late one night as they went to bed, they had no idea that their lives were about to change forever (Phyl Newbeck).
Mildred was born on July 22, 1939 in Central Point, Virginia. Mildred Loving was of Native American, African American, and European descent. Mildred’s family had strong roots in Central Point, Virginia. As a young girl Mildred was very skinny, because of this she got the name “String bean”. She went to an all black high school. Although she had been very well educated,
…show more content…
Virginia is a United States Supreme Court case which laws prohibited interracial marriage. The case was brought to Mildred and Richard Loving, a white man and a black woman, who were sentenced to a year in prison for being married. The marriage violated the anti-miscegenation law, which prohibited marriage between classified “white” and “colored” people.This is how a local Sheriff ,who is believed to have received a tip, entered Mildred and Richard’s bedroom around 2 a.m. and took them to the Bowling Green Jail where they were charged with violating state law. Mildred had stayed in jail several nights while Richard was able to post bail the next day. On January 6, 1956 the Loving’s pled guilty to “cohabiting as man and wife, against the peace and dignity of the commonwealth.” That’s when the couple was sentenced to a year in prison, with the sentenced suspended if the couple were to leave Virginia and not to return to the state at the same time. Mildred, frustrated, that her and her husband could not live together decided to write Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. Kennedy sent her to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU assigned Bernard Cohen and Philip Hirschkop to motion on behalf of the Lovings in the Virginia Caroline County Court. They then requested to vacate the criminal judgments and set aside the sentences because it’s in violation of the fourteenth amendment. Before the Loving v. Virginia case, there had been several cases on the …show more content…
Web. 05 Apr. 2017.
"Loving v. Virginia." Wikiwand. Web. 05 Apr. 2017.
"Mildred Loving." Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 07 Nov. 2016. Web. 05 Apr. 2017.
Staff, Bio. "Richard Loving." Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 10 Nov. 2016. Web. 05 Apr. 2017.
Wang, Wendy. "Interracial Marriage: Who Is 'marrying Out'?" Pew Research Center. 12 June 2015. Web. 05 Apr.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1963, the Lovings filed a motion in State Trail court on the grounds on Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment were violated.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lovings pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to one year in jail. However, the trial judge agreed to suspend their sentence for 25 year if they leave Virginia and don’t come back together for 25 years. So the Lovings left the state. Later, the Lovings appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that their…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Virginia on April 7th 2003 a divided United States Supreme Court opened the possibility of constitutionally restricting certain types of hate speech. The court was to hear a case that spoke to one specific Virginia state statute that prohibited cross burning with the intent to intimidate, and also rendered that any such burning shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group. This court would see this statute being used between two separate cases. The first case was against Barry Black; in August of 1998 Black led a Ku Klux Klan rally at which the conclusion resulted in the burning of a cross on private property with the permission of the owner. Black was charged under the state statute, “Burning a cross with the intent to intimidate.” [347] The jury was instructed in accordance with the Model Jury Instruction that the burning of the cross by itself is sufficient evidence from which you may infer the required intent. [364] In May 1998 Richard Elliot and Jonathan O’Mara attempted to burn a cross on the lawn of Elliot’s neighbor and were charged in accordance under the cross-burning statute. After all of the respondents were convicted, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme court reversed all the convictions holding that the Virginia cross-burning statute is analytically indistinguishable from the ordinance found…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedure: James Obergefell and his partner of over twenty years, John Arthur travelled from Ohio to Maryland in order to marry. John died three months later of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis but Ohio law prevented James being listed on John’s death certificate as surviving spouse. With John Arthur‘s death approaching, he and James Obergefell filed a complaint against, among others, the Director of the Ohio Department of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. They then moved to the state of Virginia where they faced criminal charges. Both of them pled guilty and were sentenced to one year imprisonment but the sentence would be waved for 25 years if they moved out of state and didn’t return.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you characterize the relationship between William Byrd and Lucy Parke Byrd? If Lucy had diary, how do you think she might have characterized the same events? The relationship William Byrd and Lucy Parke Byrd was quite different than most marriages in the old Virginia days. Lucy Parke was rather knowledgeable than most women her age, while she grew up educated. Lucy Parke caught the attention of William Byrd, by the grants her family had inherited but also from her beauty. William Byrd consumed a weakness for feminine women. He often was unfaithful to Lucy Parke. In William Byrd diary he says,” I kissed Mrs. Chiswell and kissed her on the bed till she was angry and my wife also was uneasy about it, and cried as soon as the company was gone.” Another incident occurred, in which Lucy’s anger and jealousy may have gotten the best of her. For example, “In the evening my and little jenny had a great quarrel in which my wife got the worst but at last by the help of the family Jenny was overcome and soundly whipped. Jenny is also known as “a mistress.” William Byrd cared for Lucy Parke’s health and well-being. William often prayed for Lucy Parke during her very sick days while dealing with a miscarriage. William was saddened for the pain his wife was dealing with. In his diary he mentions, “Wife grew very ill which made me weep for her.” The characterization of this relationship was uneasy, wealthy and troubling at times. Through the marriage was primarily based on the wealth of William Byrd owning slaves and land. In my conclusion I sense that Byrd had slight compassion for Lucy and primarily saw her as an “object” to him. Lucy Parke in my opinion would have characterized it in a more perturbed way. She had a rough time dealing with her miscarriages. Lucy Parke would have expressed her personal life with more detail on how she felt about William,…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bessie Coleman Role Model

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bessie Coleman was born January 26, 1892 in Atlanta, Texas to a poor family of sharecroppers. She was one of thirteen children of Susan and George Coleman. According to Roni Morales:…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lovings were represented by American Civil Liberties Union and had the conviction appealed. The Supreme Court ruled that their rights to equal protection and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment was violated. The Racial Integrity law was stroke down. The Supreme Court recognized that this law was meant to keep all others segregated from Caucasians.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hence, in 1963, the case was repealed by Lovings stating that the judgment was in violation of the fourteenth amendment, but the state trail and the courts denied it signifying that the statues were constitutional. The state failing in their efforts the case was brought to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Warren proceeding over the case re-opened in 1967 gave the final verdict that previous sentencing by the state was in violation of principal of equality. Then ordered that under the constitution the freedom to marry or not another person of a different race was an individual choice and was not for the states to decide. Accordingly, the limitation on admitting racial minorities placed by the Brown University a state funded university was also in violation of equal protection clause, which paved the way for Affirmative action in 1961 that requires equal access to education for underrepresented factions, such as women and…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sollors, Werner, ed. Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States v. Virginia court case was debated on Jan 17, 1996 at Virginia Military Institute. The advocates involved were Paul Bender, who argued the case for the United States and Theodore B. Olson, who argued the case on behalf of Virginia. The U.S was the petitioner, while Virginia was the accused. According to "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court Case and Opinions.” the case was about Virginia Military Institute violating the fourteenth Amendments of Equal Protection by maintaining a public founded Virginia Military Institute as an all-male institution. According to "United States v. Virginia 518 U.S. 515 (1996)." Justia Law, the intention of the VMI was to create “citizen soldiers”, men who are prepared for leadership in civilian life and in military service. The VMI was trying to train male leaders of the future excluding the females.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is better to be hated for what you are then to be loved for what you are not,” this was said by Andre Gide and there has never been a more true statement. In this paper the topic of Obergefell V. Hodges will be discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic, but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Life of Dorothea Lange

    • 2976 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Dorothea Margaretta Nutzhorn’s story begins on May 26, 1895 in Hoboken, New Jersey. She was born at home and was the first born to second generation German emigrants Heinrich and Johanna Nutzhorn. Heinrich and Johanna were still newlyweds, having been married in 1894.…

    • 2976 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    America’s first biracial child was born in 1620 before anti miscegenation laws were created to prevent African Americans from getting romantically involved with Whites. Negative attitudes towards interracial relationships were fueled by racial discrimination and the devotion to keep each race pure. In today's evolving society interracial relationships are still discouraged, especially between Whites and Blacks (Childs, 2005) due to parental approval and racism. Interracial unions are believed to be evidence of a cultural development resulting from America’s practices of racial boundaries in social interaction (King & Bratter, 2007). In today’s society it is influential to increase contact amongst different races and cultures…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Laura B. Randolph "Black women - white men: what 's goin ' on?" EbonyFindArticles.com. 26 Jan, 2010. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1077/is_n5_v44/ai_7405473/…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays