Preview

What Is The Validity Of The Louisiana Purchase

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Validity Of The Louisiana Purchase
Scott Colon
Professor Wilkerson
American Federal Government
18 January 2013

Examining the Constitutionality of the Louisiana Purchase The acquisition of the Louisiana Purchase caused a political debate of the constitution in the early United States government. There was a difference of opinions between politicians including Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine. Many believed that the provisions outlined in the United States Constitution should be strictly followed, but others believe that the Constitution was open to interpretation. These differences of opinion over the interpretation came into play when Jefferson made the Louisiana Purchase with France.
Jefferson was a staunch Federalist who believed in applying the words of the Constitution
…show more content…
This land could be used for western expansion as the population of the young country continued to increase. Thomas Paine was one of the main politicians who voiced concern over the religious differences between the populations of the current United States and those that would inhabit the new territory. It was a problem of national unity. He was concerned over how the United States would add those who already resided in the territory. These inhabitants had gone through a transfer of power and control from Spain, France, and now the United States. The religions worshiped by these inhabitants were based on the prior countries that held control. Paine was very concerned by this because the territory had a large population of Catholics, whereas the majority of the United States was Protestant. These inhabitants had also been in control based on rulers based on divine right. Paine was concerned with how the newest citizens of the United Stated would accept the Constitution, based on a separation between church and state. Despite these concerns, Paine did acknowledge that assimilation would be successful, but it would take

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was a limited-government Democrat-Republican. While in office, Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory. This purchase, which stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains, empowered the nation government and posed a major philosophical problem for Jefferson. Jefferson believed that all powers of the National Government were enumerated and…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the treaty we acquire territory; therefore, the treaty is unconstitutional.” (Doc A) however, ironically, the federalists were known for having a loose interpretation of the constitution, and, instead, Jefferson was the one who had a hard time with the strict interpretation of the constitution on the issue. Other excuses brought up by the federalists against the issue of the Louisiana purchase were the threat that the, now bordering, Spanish now posed against the United States due to the standing army that Spain had, and because it would “destroy with a single operation the whole weight and importance of the eastern states”. Despite the opposition by the federalists, Jefferson was able to pass the Louisiana Purchase in congress, as the benefits of the extreme bargain far outweighed the excuses that the federalists were offering; thus, giving many citizens the hoped of a new beginning in the west and the start of the westward expansion. Although the war of 1812 did not acquire more land for the United States, it helped to clear the way for expansion by removing the British from United States territory, thus clearing the way for American expansion. Not only did the war remove the British but it also led to the demise of the Federalist…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase is seen as a loose construction conclusion. Since the constitution does not state that the president can buy foreign land, Jefferson was not following the constitution when he made this decision. Jefferson submitted the agreement with France to the senate and after the republican majority ratified the purchase, the Louisiana territory was officially the United States. Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase benefitted the United States…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson vs Hamilton Dbq

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were two great leaders who had differing opinions on numerous issues. Alexander Hamilton interpreted the constitution loosely and was for a strong government while Thomas Jefferson strictly interpreted the constitution and was for states rights. Federalist ideals represented Hamilton's opinions while Jefferson’s opposing views were found in the Democratic­Republicans. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had contrasting views on key issues. A key issue debated on by Jefferson and Hamilton was the constitutionality of a Bank of the United States. Jefferson believed the bank was unconstitutional due to his strict interpretation of the Constitution.(Doc A) Although he believed a bank was overstepping the constitutional boundaries and advocated against it, Jefferson did not destroy it during his presidency. Hamilton thought a Bank of the United States was constitutional due to his loose interpretation of the Constitution due to the Necessary and Proper Clause.(Doc B) Jefferson disagreed with Hamilton stating that all powers not declared in the constitution were delegated to the states. The Alien and Sedition Acts caused quarrel between Hamilton and Jefferson. Enacted by the Federalists, the Alien Act arrested and deported illegal aliens while the Sedition Act limited criticism of the government. (Doc F) The acts sparked the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions which, penned by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were responses to the Alien and Sedition Acts declaring them…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IsaacS Period 4 LEQ

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, upon ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and Jeffersonian Democrats parties established their footing in the American political system. These two parties divided the nation into northern ideals and southern Jefferson based ideals that were very different. Due to this political disunity, sectional interest arose rather than national interest as observed in the 1828 "tariff abomination.”…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ ratify

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Some members of congress believed that the Articles of confederation needed to be changed meanwhile others disagreed. After the revolutionary war the people needed a sense of power which they received when the new government was centered on the state. The new United States needed a strong central government but many feared of a central government with too much power. This called for a new constitution which caused great conflict between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush-Revolution of 1800

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Politically, Jefferson believed in strict interpretation of the Constitution unlike his predecessors. He bought the Louisiana Purchase which the Constitution did not fully allow him to do. Under Federalist views, the economy of the United States was looking to be increasingly more urban with a shift from agricultural ways. With Thomas Jefferson being elected into office, he hoped that America would maintain a strict agrarian economy with crops being the top export to foreign countries. He wanted Americans to stay a primarily rural-living nation with farming the main aspect of the economy.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was made in order to keep peace between its people however, certain topics were not talked about. As an emerging country many new problems and situations occurred and were brought up. Economically the North and the South were completely different. The constitution failed to address slavery, which was important to the South By not addressing this topic the North and the South began having tension between each other. Not talking about slavery backfired because the North and the South disagreed on the topic of slavery and they eventually went to war, due to the differences based on the constitution.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a small time government official, Jefferson was a believer of strict-constructionism. He voiced his opinions against a strong centralized government and how the Constitution should be strictly followed. However, as he gained more and more power and rose throughout the country’s political ranks, he began to contradict his earlier beliefs. There are two major examples of this. Example number one is the Louisiana Purchase. If Jefferson was still following his beliefs of strict-constructionism, then the Louisiana Purchase would have never happened. However, he began to look at the Constitution in a more loose way, not completely going by the book, which led to the Jefferson Compromise. The Jefferson Compromise was Thomas Jefferson putting aside his constitutional and moral values to purchase that large area of land in a transaction now known as the Louisiana Purchase. The second major example of Jefferson’s conflicting beliefs is his slaves. Thomas Jefferson was always stating that “all men are created equal,” however, Jefferson kept 200 slaves that he never set free.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The different biased policies of which Federalists believed in interpreting the Constitution broadly, while Jeffersonian Republicans (Anti-Feds) believed it should be interpreted strictly, continued through the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. However, throughout both of their terms, both parties eventually “switched” their ideals, and followed the other party’s belief. “Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a singled government” (Doc. A) is a letter from Jefferson to Granger, then the complete opposite is written in Doc F, where Randolph talks about how the J. Republicans abandon their original principles. This is just one example of how later the two parties ideals were “switched.” Actions such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Embargo Act, and the establishment of the Second National Bank show this.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson believed in minimal federal control, he felt that individual states should do as they please on their own territory. He also felt that centralized power was unnecessary, he ended up supporting the cause because he realized he could fix the issue from the inside. Thomas Jefferson's differences were bound to start a revolution, i say this because he was going against all the top notches in congress and he was basically contradicting everything they stood for. As stated in The American Political Tradition “ It would be useful in moderating the warmer spirits and promoting a wholesome and practicable reformation only”, Hofstadter tries to portray Thomas Jefferson’s eagerness for reform and how he meant what he said about keeping it…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine was a well known supporter of American Independence in England. America consists of the variety of religions, races, languages, and cultures. It can be concluded that it is essentially difficult for individuals to essentially assimilate and form a sense of unity. It has the ability to cause disruptions among each other as a result from the interactions of the differences. Paine presents his argument in, Rights of Man that a simple establishment of government will ultimately diminish the issues and furthermore create an equal justification. It is critical that the government overall creates unification between individuals and enforces appropriate laws; however, Paine’s characterizations does not hold accountability in portraying…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays