Preview

What Was The Effect Of An Experiment On The Stanford Prison Experiment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Effect Of An Experiment On The Stanford Prison Experiment
Investigation:
The Stanford prison experiment was originally intended to run for a fortnight. However it lasted only 6 days and was ended earlier than initially planned due to the terrible living conditions and psychological problems that developed as the ‘inmates’ and ‘guards’ interacted.. The experiment was run by Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney, David Jaffe, and W. Curtis Banks. The test subjects were young male college students that were chosen from 75 volunteers. The volunteers had replied to an ad in the paper and were paid 15$ a day to participate. The students were taken from the middle class, they were intelligent and healthy, and they were screened for any psychological problems, medical issues, or crimes to ensure that none had preexisting
…show more content…
Guards were strict but not unkind and 'prisoners' were subservient, although they resented the rules and the emotionally suffocating environment. This would show that the changes in personalities and actions were due to situational differences as the guards and 'prisoners' acted according to how they believed they had been instructed. [E4] However, by the first night, the "guards" started to assert their dominance over the 'prisoners' by taking away the mattresses from some of the less docile 'prisoners' and making them sleep on the floor. When the guards weren’t reprimanded for their ruthless actions, they continued and their cruelty escalated. This change in behaviour is considered to be ‘dispositional’, or internal to the person or subject, as there was no change in the environment that would have resulted in a change of a person’s action. Change in a person’s action, on the other hand, represents a personal choice where, left to their own devices, they were intentionally mean. Additionally the guards woke 'prisoners' throughout the night by blowing their whistles in the common area, which was adjacent to the prison cells. The guards also acted without explicit instructions and forced 'prisoners' to do menial and humiliating tasks. Less than 36 hours into the experiment, serious problems started to occur. “Prisoner” #8612 began to show early signs of having a breakdown and started to scream and rage. …show more content…
In the experiment, he had people shock others with electricity and discovered that people are easily convinced to provide a (thankfully, feigned) lethal level of shock to another person when instructed that they “had to” by an “authority”, a tall white male in a lab coat. The experiment was done by telling people that another person had done something wrong and had to be punished for their mistake. The authority figure suggested that the test subject shock the wrongdoer. A pre-recorded scream would then sound, and although no one was truly hurt, the test subject didn't know that. Approximately a third of test subjects “shocked” the wrongdoer and went all the way to the top or the board, meaning that if the wrongdoer had, actually existed they would have been subjected to a ‘lethal’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Control of the experience was quickly lost. The prisoners have suffered - and accepted - treatment humiliating and sometimes sadistic on the part of the guards, and in the end many of them suffered from a severe emotional disturbance.Experience…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A controversial experiment by Zimbardo (1971) (Spoors et al.) shows how a groups of males were separated into two groups of guards and prisoners in a make shift prison. After six days of a two week experiment it was stopped. The guards became abusive while the prisoners showed signs of emotional disturbance.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Milgram’s initial obedience experiments he found all of the participants administered shocks to the confederate up to the 300-volts while 26 of the initial 40 participants administered fatal electric shocks. When he repeated the experiment he found nearly 70% of participants would administer a fatal shock if instructed by an authority figure to do so. In the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo found both the student guards and student prisoners assumed their roles immediately. The guards began to degrade the prisoners and as a result the prisoners started to reject the guard’s authority and began to revolt. Secondly, Zimbardo found that some of the guards displayed cruel behavior and punished the prisoners with manual labor…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1973, The Psychologist Phillip Zimbardo focused on idea of imprisonment and the interaction between guards and prsioners. More specifically he focused on whether the brutality amongst the guards in American prisons was due to the cruel personalities of the guards or had more to do with the environment of the establishment. For example, prisoner and guards may have personalities which make conflict inevitable, with prisoners lacking respect for law and order and guards being intimidating and aggressive. Alternatively, prisoners and guards may behave in a unkind manner due to the situation they are placed in. To arrive at a conclusion Zimbardo and his colleagues conducted what was called the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment.’…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment The aim of the Stanford Prison Experiment was to investigate how readily people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoner in a role-playing exercise that simulated prison life. Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities or had to do with the environment of prison itself. This two week experiment was abruptly ended after nine days due to the disturbing behaviour the guards were afflicting onto the prisoners.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the Stanford Prison Experiment was originally expected to last 14 days, it had to be stopped after just six due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became abusive, and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress and anxiety. While the prisoners and guards were allowed to interact in any way they wanted, the interactions were hostile or even dehumanizing.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained both positive and negative aspects; which will be discussed further in this paper.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Surprisingly, a prisoner was already emotionally out of control and refused to cooperate on the second day of the study. Some guards even secretly attacked the prisoner with fire extinguishers regardless of the rules. Since then, the guards and prisoners started to develop roles defined by themselves and eventually attaining achieved roles in the prison. The guards gain status, or social importance, by constantly bully the prisoners psychologically, equipped with wooden batons and enjoy comfortable beds and meals. Meanwhile, the prisoners are abused and suffering from lack of food and other comforts unless they passively follow the orders given by the guards, and hence the…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prisoners and guards had many burdens of disobedience. In the beginning of the experiment, the "prisoners" were stripped of everything and emotionally torn down for being "disobedient". They were dehumanized in every way. They couldn't speak to another unless they called each other by their prison identification number. They were told the rules of the prison and explained they would be punished if any of the rules were broken. They had to ask permission to do things that they would do on a daily basis such as going to the bathroom and smoking a cigarette. Throughout the experiment, the more aggressive and authoritative the guards became, the more disobedient that the prisoners became even to the point of rioting at during the beginning of the experiment. Everything else was taken away from them. They didn't have anything to think about except for following the rules. The conversations the prisoners had consisted of talking about ways to escape the prison and overthrowing the guards. They hardly ever spoke of their personal lives and lives outside of the prison.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The line between good and evil is permeable and almost anyone can be induced to cross it when pressured by situational forces.” Said Philip Zimbardo. The Stanford Prison Experiment helped solve many mysteries about forensic psychology and how good, normal people, can turn evil. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychologically intense experiment that affected the lives of normal, mentally healthy, students who were brought into interference with situational forces.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When obeying authority one can often loose thought of morals and beliefs. In the experiments the men obey the authority figure by doing cruel things they would not usually do. These experiments turn mentally stable men into a person willing to inflict harsh punishments on innocent people while following orders. Night by Elie Wiesel, The Milgram Shock Experiment, and the stanford prison experiment shows how obedience to an authority can cause people to stray from their conscience.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stanford prison experiment is one of the infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University in August, 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The basic premise was to find out and determine what happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? Does the system that we inhabit and are a part of start to control our behaviour or our inner morality and values continue to direct it? It was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. To carry out this experiment, a subterranean jail was set up in the psychology department building. Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Those 24 were then divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. The researchers held an orientation session for guards the day before the experiment, during which they instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners. In the footage of the study, Zimbardo can be seen talking to the guards: "You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they'll have no privacy... We're going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we'll have all the power and they'll have none." The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays