Preview

What Was The Effect Of An Experiment On The Stanford Prison Experiment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Was The Effect Of An Experiment On The Stanford Prison Experiment
Investigation:
The Stanford prison experiment was originally intended to run for a fortnight. However it lasted only 6 days and was ended earlier than initially planned due to the terrible living conditions and psychological problems that developed as the ‘inmates’ and ‘guards’ interacted.. The experiment was run by Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney, David Jaffe, and W. Curtis Banks. The test subjects were young male college students that were chosen from 75 volunteers. The volunteers had replied to an ad in the paper and were paid 15$ a day to participate. The students were taken from the middle class, they were intelligent and healthy, and they were screened for any psychological problems, medical issues, or crimes to ensure that none had preexisting
…show more content…
Guards were strict but not unkind and 'prisoners' were subservient, although they resented the rules and the emotionally suffocating environment. This would show that the changes in personalities and actions were due to situational differences as the guards and 'prisoners' acted according to how they believed they had been instructed. [E4] However, by the first night, the "guards" started to assert their dominance over the 'prisoners' by taking away the mattresses from some of the less docile 'prisoners' and making them sleep on the floor. When the guards weren’t reprimanded for their ruthless actions, they continued and their cruelty escalated. This change in behaviour is considered to be ‘dispositional’, or internal to the person or subject, as there was no change in the environment that would have resulted in a change of a person’s action. Change in a person’s action, on the other hand, represents a personal choice where, left to their own devices, they were intentionally mean. Additionally the guards woke 'prisoners' throughout the night by blowing their whistles in the common area, which was adjacent to the prison cells. The guards also acted without explicit instructions and forced 'prisoners' to do menial and humiliating tasks. Less than 36 hours into the experiment, serious problems started to occur. “Prisoner” #8612 began to show early signs of having a breakdown and started to scream and rage. …show more content…
In the experiment, he had people shock others with electricity and discovered that people are easily convinced to provide a (thankfully, feigned) lethal level of shock to another person when instructed that they “had to” by an “authority”, a tall white male in a lab coat. The experiment was done by telling people that another person had done something wrong and had to be punished for their mistake. The authority figure suggested that the test subject shock the wrongdoer. A pre-recorded scream would then sound, and although no one was truly hurt, the test subject didn't know that. Approximately a third of test subjects “shocked” the wrongdoer and went all the way to the top or the board, meaning that if the wrongdoer had, actually existed they would have been subjected to a ‘lethal’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Experiment is a study of experimental psychology conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971 on the effects of the prison situation. It was created with students playing the roles of guards and prisoners. It was intended to study the behavior of ordinary people in such a context and effect was to show that this was the situation rather that the personality of the participants who was at the origin of behaviours sometimes opposite the values professed by participants before the start of the study.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Milgram’s initial obedience experiments he found all of the participants administered shocks to the confederate up to the 300-volts while 26 of the initial 40 participants administered fatal electric shocks. When he repeated the experiment he found nearly 70% of participants would administer a fatal shock if instructed by an authority figure to do so. In the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo found both the student guards and student prisoners assumed their roles immediately. The guards began to degrade the prisoners and as a result the prisoners started to reject the guard’s authority and began to revolt. Secondly, Zimbardo found that some of the guards displayed cruel behavior and punished the prisoners with manual labor…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment had several important implications. One of which derives from average males that were so drastically affected under the burdens of being placed in a confinement setting. When these outcomes are correlated to the much more long- term and harshness of a real prison, you can only imagine the adverse effects on the real criminals serving jail…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1973, The Psychologist Phillip Zimbardo focused on idea of imprisonment and the interaction between guards and prsioners. More specifically he focused on whether the brutality amongst the guards in American prisons was due to the cruel personalities of the guards or had more to do with the environment of the establishment. For example, prisoner and guards may have personalities which make conflict inevitable, with prisoners lacking respect for law and order and guards being intimidating and aggressive. Alternatively, prisoners and guards may behave in a unkind manner due to the situation they are placed in. To arrive at a conclusion Zimbardo and his colleagues conducted what was called the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment.’…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment The aim of the Stanford Prison Experiment was to investigate how readily people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoner in a role-playing exercise that simulated prison life. Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities or had to do with the environment of prison itself. This two week experiment was abruptly ended after nine days due to the disturbing behaviour the guards were afflicting onto the prisoners.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the Stanford Prison Experiment was originally expected to last 14 days, it had to be stopped after just six due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became abusive, and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress and anxiety. While the prisoners and guards were allowed to interact in any way they wanted, the interactions were hostile or even dehumanizing.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained both positive and negative aspects; which will be discussed further in this paper.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment SPE The Stanford Prison Experiment has given a strong hint about how influential the society and situation can be. The experiment was originally designed to test whether the tension in prison was a cause of inmates’ inherently flawed personality; however, the result has revealed that any healthy human being can be transformed into a violent figure after being assigned a specific role and put in a designed situation. Indeed, the result was shocking, and the procedure of the setting of the prison was insanely inhumane. Despite the criticisms, the experiment serves a good purpose for people to better understand social psychology.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo, was performed to see the process that takes place where guards and prisoners "learn" to become authoritarian guards and compliant prisoners. (Zimbardo, 732).…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The line between good and evil is permeable and almost anyone can be induced to cross it when pressured by situational forces.” Said Philip Zimbardo. The Stanford Prison Experiment helped solve many mysteries about forensic psychology and how good, normal people, can turn evil. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychologically intense experiment that affected the lives of normal, mentally healthy, students who were brought into interference with situational forces.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When asked to continue administering shocks the teachers would tend to obey the orders from the experimenter allowing the experimenter to act through them and causing them to Enter an agentic state. “People will obey an authority when they believe that the authority will take responsibility for the consequences of their actions”(Milgram 3). When the teachers did not administer a shock they were read a series of prods in order to ensure the authority of the experimenter as well as giving responsibility to the experimenter. “When participants were reminded that they had responsibility for their own actions, almost none of them were prepared to obey”( Milgram 3). When the teachers were faced with the responsibility of their actions none of them were willing to proceed with the experiment, but when relieved of responsibility of actions the teachers entered an agentic state allowing an obedience to the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stanford prison experiment is one of the infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University in August, 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The basic premise was to find out and determine what happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? Does the system that we inhabit and are a part of start to control our behaviour or our inner morality and values continue to direct it? It was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. To carry out this experiment, a subterranean jail was set up in the psychology department building. Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Those 24 were then divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. The researchers held an orientation session for guards the day before the experiment, during which they instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners. In the footage of the study, Zimbardo can be seen talking to the guards: "You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they'll have no privacy... We're going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we'll have all the power and they'll have none." The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A controversial experiment by Zimbardo (1971) (Spoors et al.) shows how a groups of males were separated into two groups of guards and prisoners in a make shift prison. After six days of a two week experiment it was stopped. The guards became abusive while the prisoners showed signs of emotional disturbance.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays