Cases such as: Yasui v. United States, Hirabayashi v. United States, Korematsu v. United States were significant cases. The court cases conflicted about the curfews and internment camps reasoning if the implementations were constitutional or not. Yasui, Hirabayashi, and Korematsu refused to relocate into internment camps and took the cases into Supreme Court. As they argued about their rights throughout the Constitution, the main argument was about implementing the Executive Order through constitutional reasonings. Although all three cases were overruled, the court ruled that curfew during war times and the exclusion order to lead the internment camps were
Cases such as: Yasui v. United States, Hirabayashi v. United States, Korematsu v. United States were significant cases. The court cases conflicted about the curfews and internment camps reasoning if the implementations were constitutional or not. Yasui, Hirabayashi, and Korematsu refused to relocate into internment camps and took the cases into Supreme Court. As they argued about their rights throughout the Constitution, the main argument was about implementing the Executive Order through constitutional reasonings. Although all three cases were overruled, the court ruled that curfew during war times and the exclusion order to lead the internment camps were